TSTP Solution File: GEO051-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : GEO051-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:44:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 15 unt; 6 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 49 ( 6 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(b12,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| between(X1,X3,X4)
| between(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.R8EsKyJqyK/E---3.1_23267.p',b12) ).
cnf(u_not_v,hypothesis,
u != v,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.R8EsKyJqyK/E---3.1_23267.p',u_not_v) ).
cnf(v_between_u_and_w,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.R8EsKyJqyK/E---3.1_23267.p',v_between_u_and_w) ).
cnf(b5,axiom,
( between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.R8EsKyJqyK/E---3.1_23267.p',b5) ).
cnf(v_between_u_and_x,hypothesis,
between(u,v,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.R8EsKyJqyK/E---3.1_23267.p',v_between_u_and_x) ).
cnf(prove_x_between_v_and_w,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,x,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.R8EsKyJqyK/E---3.1_23267.p',prove_x_between_v_and_w) ).
cnf(w_not_between_v_and_x,hypothesis,
~ between(v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.R8EsKyJqyK/E---3.1_23267.p',w_not_between_v_and_x) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X1 = X2
| between(X1,X3,X4)
| between(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[b12]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
u != v,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[u_not_v]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X1 = X2
| between(X1,X3,X4)
| between(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X4) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
v_between_u_and_w ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
u != v,
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[b5]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( between(u,X1,w)
| between(u,w,X1)
| ~ between(u,v,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
between(u,v,x),
v_between_u_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( between(u,w,x)
| between(u,x,w) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,x,w),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_x_between_v_and_w]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
( between(u,w,x)
| between(X1,x,w)
| ~ between(u,X1,x) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,x,w),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
~ between(v,w,x),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[w_not_between_v_and_x]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
( between(X1,w,x)
| ~ between(u,X1,w) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
~ between(v,w,x),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_10]),c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : GEO051-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:42:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.R8EsKyJqyK/E---3.1_23267.p
% 0.22/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # new_bool_3 with pid 23348 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.51 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # partial match(2): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with pid 23351 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.51 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # partial match(2): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 82
% 0.22/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 38
% 0.22/0.51 # Initial clauses : 44
% 0.22/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.22/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.22/0.51 # Processed clauses : 128
% 0.22/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.22/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 122
% 0.22/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.22/0.51 # Generated clauses : 159
% 0.22/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 79
% 0.22/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Paramodulations : 158
% 0.22/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.22/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 79
% 0.22/0.51 # ...of those cached : 56
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 76
% 0.22/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.22/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.22/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 58
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34
% 0.22/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 127
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 46
% 0.22/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1782
% 0.22/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1406
% 0.22/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.22/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.22/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 35
% 0.22/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3553
% 0.22/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 283
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.22/0.51 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.22/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------