TSTP Solution File: GEO036-3 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : GEO036-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 20:07:36 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.72s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  17   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f150,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f76,f83,f142,f149]) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    ~ spl2_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f148,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f145,f44]) ).

fof(f44,axiom,
    ! [X3,X10] : between(X10,X3,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ( ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1)
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f67]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ( lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_2
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_2 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])]) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lower_dimension3) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ~ spl2_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f141]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f138,f47]) ).

fof(f47,axiom,
    ! [X3,X10] : between(X10,X10,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ( ~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f75]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ( lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_3
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_3 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ~ spl2_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f78,f47]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ( ~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_1)
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f11,f71]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ( lower_dimension_point_2 = lower_dimension_point_3
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> lower_dimension_point_2 = lower_dimension_point_3 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])]) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lower_dimension2) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | spl2_2
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f58,f73,f69,f65]) ).

fof(f58,axiom,
    ( lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_3
    | lower_dimension_point_2 = lower_dimension_point_3
    | lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_axioms_points_are_distinct) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : GEO036-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 14:08:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.34  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.13/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.72  % (19802)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.47/0.72  % (19796)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.47/0.72  % (19798)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.47/0.72  % (19797)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.47/0.72  % (19799)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.47/0.72  % (19800)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.47/0.72  % (19801)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-19795"
% 0.56/0.72  % (19801)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.72  % (19798)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.72  % (19800)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (19800)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.72  % (19800)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.72  % (19800)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.72  
% 0.56/0.72  % (19800)Memory used [KB]: 1088
% 0.56/0.72  % (19800)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.72  % (19800)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.72  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.72  
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)Memory used [KB]: 1119
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.56/0.72  % (19802)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.56/0.72  % (19795)Success in time 0.368 s
% 0.56/0.72  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------