TSTP Solution File: GEO021-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : GEO021-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:11:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 9 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 8 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 0 usr; 3 ari)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 3 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 22 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_4,type,
sQ1_eqProxy: ( $int * $int ) > $o ).
tff(pred_def_5,type,
sQ2_eqProxy: ( $rat * $rat ) > $o ).
tff(pred_def_6,type,
sQ3_eqProxy: ( $real * $real ) > $o ).
fof(f146,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f144,f32]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
~ equidistant(x,w,v,u),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
~ equidistant(x,w,v,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_symmetry) ).
fof(f144,plain,
equidistant(x,w,v,u),
inference(resolution,[],[f100,f79]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( ~ equidistant(X3,X2,X4,X5)
| equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f22,f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
! [X0,X1] : equidistant(X0,X1,X1,X0),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : equidistant(X0,X1,X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_for_equidistance) ).
fof(f22,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X3)
| equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X4,X5) ),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X3)
| ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).
fof(f100,plain,
equidistant(w,x,v,u),
inference(resolution,[],[f78,f25]) ).
fof(f78,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ equidistant(u,v,X0,X1)
| equidistant(w,x,X0,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f22,f37]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
equidistant(u,v,w,x),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f19,axiom,
equidistant(u,v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_to_v_equals_w_to_x) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GEO021-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 21:20:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 % (6819)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (6805)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (6811)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (6821)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (6819)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.51 TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.51 % (6813)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.51 TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.51 TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.52 TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.52 TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.52 % (6827)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (6813)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (6806)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (6819)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (6804)Success in time 0.16 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------