TSTP Solution File: GEO021-2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : GEO021-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:57:23 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(transitivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(u_to_v_equals_w_to_x,hypothesis,
equidistant(u,v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_to_v_equals_w_to_x) ).
cnf(reflexivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',reflexivity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(prove_symmetry,negated_conjecture,
~ equidistant(x,w,v,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_symmetry) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_for_equidistance]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
equidistant(u,v,w,x),
u_to_v_equals_w_to_x ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1),
reflexivity_for_equidistance ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( equidistant(X1,X2,w,x)
| ~ equidistant(u,v,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X4,X3,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
equidistant(v,u,w,x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
equidistant(w,x,u,v),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ equidistant(x,w,v,u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_symmetry]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
equidistant(u,v,x,w),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ equidistant(x,w,v,u),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09 % Problem : GEO021-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sun May 19 15:11:07 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # new_bool_3 with pid 32501 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.40 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 32505 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.40 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.40 # Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.14/0.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 12
% 0.14/0.40 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.14/0.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.14/0.40 # Processed clauses : 27
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.14/0.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.14/0.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.14/0.40 # Generated clauses : 35
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25
% 0.14/0.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Paramodulations : 35
% 0.14/0.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.14/0.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.14/0.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.14/0.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 58
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.14/0.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 97
% 0.14/0.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
% 0.14/0.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.14/0.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 29
% 0.14/0.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.14/0.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 885
% 0.14/0.40 # Search garbage collected termcells : 105
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.40 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.40 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.14/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.14/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------