TSTP Solution File: GEO015-2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : GEO015-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:41:08 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(transitivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dAdR2qOG2d/E---3.1_30856.p',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(u_to_v_equals_w_to_x,hypothesis,
equidistant(u,v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dAdR2qOG2d/E---3.1_30856.p',u_to_v_equals_w_to_x) ).
cnf(reflexivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dAdR2qOG2d/E---3.1_30856.p',reflexivity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(prove_symmetry,negated_conjecture,
~ equidistant(w,x,u,v),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dAdR2qOG2d/E---3.1_30856.p',prove_symmetry) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_for_equidistance]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
equidistant(u,v,w,x),
u_to_v_equals_w_to_x ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1),
reflexivity_for_equidistance ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( equidistant(X1,X2,w,x)
| ~ equidistant(u,v,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ equidistant(w,x,u,v),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_symmetry]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X4,X3,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
equidistant(v,u,w,x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ equidistant(w,x,u,v),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO015-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.32 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:25:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dAdR2qOG2d/E---3.1_30856.p
% 0.18/0.47 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # new_bool_1 with pid 30936 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 30938 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 12
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.18/0.47 # Processed clauses : 20
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 0.18/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Generated clauses : 14
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.18/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Paramodulations : 14
% 0.18/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.18/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 32
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.18/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 91
% 0.18/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 645
% 0.18/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 105
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.18/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------