TSTP Solution File: GEO003-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : GEO003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:41:04 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 4 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(identity_for_equidistance,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rAn1CyDOMC/E---3.1_11794.p',identity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rAn1CyDOMC/E---3.1_11794.p',segment_construction2) ).
cnf(prove_b_between_a_and_b,negated_conjecture,
~ between(a,b,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rAn1CyDOMC/E---3.1_11794.p',prove_b_between_a_and_b) ).
cnf(segment_construction1,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rAn1CyDOMC/E---3.1_11794.p',segment_construction1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[identity_for_equidistance]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
segment_construction2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ between(a,b,b),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_b_between_a_and_b]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
segment_construction1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
extension(X1,X2,X3,X3) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ between(a,b,b),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
between(X1,X2,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : GEO003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:23:38 EDT 2024
% 0.21/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rAn1CyDOMC/E---3.1_11794.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # sh5l with pid 11916 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 178s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with pid 11925 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 178s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 8
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 18
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 74
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 80
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 24
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 765
% 0.21/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 99
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------