TSTP Solution File: GEG024_1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : GEG024_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:57:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.33s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   7 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  179 ( 151 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   24 (  11 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  175 (  12   ~;   5   |; 154   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   28 (  13 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  199 (  27 atm;   7 fun; 165 num;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   2   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   31 (   9 usr;  28 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  48   !;   4   ?;  52   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    city: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    d: ( city * city ) > $int ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    inh: city > $int ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    kiel: city ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    hamburg: city ).

tff(func_def_4,type,
    berlin: city ).

tff(func_def_5,type,
    cologne: city ).

tff(func_def_6,type,
    frankfurt: city ).

tff(func_def_7,type,
    saarbruecken: city ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    munich: city ).

tff(f71,plain,
    $false,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f70]) ).

tff(f70,plain,
    $less(1774224,1000000),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f69,f36]) ).

tff(f36,plain,
    inh(hamburg) = 1774224,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ( ! [X0: city] :
        ( $less(inh(X0),1000000)
        | $less(100,d(kiel,X0)) )
    & ( inh(kiel) = 238281 )
    & ( inh(saarbruecken) = 175810 )
    & ( inh(frankfurt) = 671927 )
    & ( inh(cologne) = 998105 )
    & ( inh(munich) = 1330440 )
    & ( inh(hamburg) = 1774224 )
    & ( inh(berlin) = 3442675 )
    & ( 360 = d(munich,saarbruecken) )
    & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
    & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
    & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
    & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
    & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
    & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
    & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
    & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
    & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
    & ! [X1: city] : ( 0 = d(X1,X1) )
    & ! [X2: city,X3: city,X4: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X2,X3),d(X3,X4)),d(X2,X4))
    & ! [X5: city,X6: city] : ( d(X5,X6) = d(X6,X5) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ! [X6: city] :
        ( $less(inh(X6),1000000)
        | $less(100,d(kiel,X6)) )
    & ( inh(kiel) = 238281 )
    & ( inh(saarbruecken) = 175810 )
    & ( inh(frankfurt) = 671927 )
    & ( inh(cologne) = 998105 )
    & ( inh(munich) = 1330440 )
    & ( inh(hamburg) = 1774224 )
    & ( inh(berlin) = 3442675 )
    & ( 360 = d(munich,saarbruecken) )
    & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
    & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
    & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
    & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
    & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
    & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
    & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
    & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
    & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
    & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
    & ! [X1: city,X2: city,X3: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X1,X2),d(X2,X3)),d(X1,X3))
    & ! [X4: city,X5: city] : ( d(X4,X5) = d(X5,X4) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( ! [X6: city] :
        ( $less(inh(X6),1000000)
        | $less(100,d(kiel,X6)) )
    & ( inh(kiel) = 238281 )
    & ( inh(saarbruecken) = 175810 )
    & ( inh(frankfurt) = 671927 )
    & ( inh(cologne) = 998105 )
    & ( inh(munich) = 1330440 )
    & ( inh(hamburg) = 1774224 )
    & ( inh(berlin) = 3442675 )
    & ( 360 = d(munich,saarbruecken) )
    & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
    & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
    & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
    & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
    & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
    & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
    & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
    & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
    & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
    & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
    & ! [X1: city,X2: city,X3: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X1,X2),d(X2,X3)),d(X1,X3))
    & ! [X4: city,X5: city] : ( d(X4,X5) = d(X5,X4) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( inh(kiel) = 238281 )
        & ( inh(saarbruecken) = 175810 )
        & ( inh(frankfurt) = 671927 )
        & ( inh(cologne) = 998105 )
        & ( inh(munich) = 1330440 )
        & ( inh(hamburg) = 1774224 )
        & ( inh(berlin) = 3442675 )
        & ( 360 = d(munich,saarbruecken) )
        & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
        & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
        & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
        & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
        & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
        & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
        & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
        & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
        & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
        & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
        & ! [X1: city,X2: city,X3: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X1,X2),d(X2,X3)),d(X1,X3))
        & ! [X4: city,X5: city] : ( d(X4,X5) = d(X5,X4) ) )
     => ? [X6: city] :
          ( ~ $less(inh(X6),1000000)
          & ~ $less(100,d(kiel,X6)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( inh(kiel) = 238281 )
        & ( inh(saarbruecken) = 175810 )
        & ( inh(frankfurt) = 671927 )
        & ( inh(cologne) = 998105 )
        & ( inh(munich) = 1330440 )
        & ( inh(hamburg) = 1774224 )
        & ( inh(berlin) = 3442675 )
        & ( 360 = d(munich,saarbruecken) )
        & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
        & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
        & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
        & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
        & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
        & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
        & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
        & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
        & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
        & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
        & ! [X0: city,X1: city,X2: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X0,X1),d(X1,X2)),d(X0,X2))
        & ! [X0: city,X1: city] : ( d(X0,X1) = d(X1,X0) ) )
     => ? [X0: city] :
          ( ~ $less(inh(X0),1000000)
          & ~ $less(100,d(kiel,X0)) ) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( inh(kiel) = 238281 )
        & ( inh(saarbruecken) = 175810 )
        & ( inh(frankfurt) = 671927 )
        & ( inh(cologne) = 998105 )
        & ( inh(munich) = 1330440 )
        & ( inh(hamburg) = 1774224 )
        & ( inh(berlin) = 3442675 )
        & ( 360 = d(munich,saarbruecken) )
        & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
        & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
        & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
        & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
        & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
        & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
        & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
        & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
        & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
        & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
        & ! [X0: city,X1: city,X2: city] : $lesseq(d(X0,X2),$sum(d(X0,X1),d(X1,X2)))
        & ! [X0: city,X1: city] : ( d(X0,X1) = d(X1,X0) ) )
     => ? [X0: city] :
          ( $lesseq(1000000,inh(X0))
          & $lesseq(d(kiel,X0),100) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ( inh(kiel) = 238281 )
      & ( inh(saarbruecken) = 175810 )
      & ( inh(frankfurt) = 671927 )
      & ( inh(cologne) = 998105 )
      & ( inh(munich) = 1330440 )
      & ( inh(hamburg) = 1774224 )
      & ( inh(berlin) = 3442675 )
      & ( 360 = d(munich,saarbruecken) )
      & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
      & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
      & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
      & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
      & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
      & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
      & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
      & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
      & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
      & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
      & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
      & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
      & ! [X0: city,X1: city,X2: city] : $lesseq(d(X0,X2),$sum(d(X0,X1),d(X1,X2)))
      & ! [X0: city,X1: city] : ( d(X0,X1) = d(X1,X0) ) )
   => ? [X0: city] :
        ( $lesseq(1000000,inh(X0))
        & $lesseq(d(kiel,X0),100) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',exists_big_city_distance_1) ).

tff(f69,plain,
    $less(inh(hamburg),1000000),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f64]) ).

tff(f64,plain,
    ( $less(100,90)
    | $less(inh(hamburg),1000000) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f42,f43]) ).

tff(f43,plain,
    90 = d(kiel,hamburg),
    inference(superposition,[],[f20,f31]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    d(hamburg,kiel) = 90,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X6: city,X5: city] : ( d(X5,X6) = d(X6,X5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f42,plain,
    ! [X0: city] :
      ( $less(100,d(kiel,X0))
      | $less(inh(X0),1000000) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : GEG024_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 21:57:23 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.09/0.31  % (31714)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.32  % (31716)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (31717)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.14/0.32  
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)Memory used [KB]: 731
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.32  % (31717)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (31719)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (31715)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.14/0.32  
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)Memory used [KB]: 731
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.32  % (31718)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.33  % (31718)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (31718)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-31714"
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)Memory used [KB]: 732
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (31716)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.33  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.33  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)Memory used [KB]: 825
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.33  % (31717)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.14/0.33  % (31714)Success in time 0.02 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------