TSTP Solution File: FLD070-4 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : FLD070-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:24:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09 % Problem : FLD070-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.10 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.08/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.08/0.29 % DateTime : Mon Jun 6 21:42:05 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.48/0.80 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.48/0.80 Process 3768 was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.48/0.80 Mon Jun 6 21:42:05 2022
% 0.48/0.80 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_3615_n032.cluster.edu".
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_3615_n032.cluster.edu
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.48/0.80 set(auto2).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.48/0.80 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.48/0.80 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.48/0.80 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.48/0.80 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.48/0.80 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.48/0.80 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.48/0.80 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.48/0.80 clear(print_given).
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (33 formulas)
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.48/0.80 Function symbol KB weights: additive_identity=1. a=1. b=1. multiplicative_identity=1. c=1. add=1. multiply=1. additive_inverse=1. multiplicative_inverse=1.
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.48/0.80 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.80 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.48/0.80 % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.48/0.80 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.48/0.80 % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.48/0.80 % Given clauses 58.
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 4 defined(b) # label(b_is_defined) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80 6 less_or_equal(additive_identity,a) # label(less_or_equal_4) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80 7 less_or_equal(additive_identity,b) # label(less_or_equal_5) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80 8 sum(a,b,c) # label(sum_6) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80 9 -less_or_equal(additive_identity,c) # label(not_less_or_equal_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80 12 sum(additive_identity,A,A) | -defined(A) # label(existence_of_identity_addition) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80 20 less_or_equal(A,B) | -less_or_equal(A,C) | -less_or_equal(C,B) # label(transitivity_of_order_relation) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80 27 less_or_equal(A,B) | -less_or_equal(C,D) | -sum(C,E,A) | -sum(D,E,B) # label(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80 63 sum(additive_identity,b,b). [resolve(12,b,4,a)].
% 0.48/0.80 106 -less_or_equal(b,c). [ur(20,a,9,a,b,7,a)].
% 0.48/0.80 204 $F. [ur(27,a,106,a,b,6,a,d,8,a),unit_del(a,63)].
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 Given=58. Generated=241. Kept=203. proofs=1.
% 0.48/0.80 Usable=58. Sos=141. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=37. Hints=0.
% 0.48/0.80 Megabytes=0.16.
% 0.48/0.80 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.48/0.80 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.48/0.80
% 0.48/0.80 Process 3768 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jun 6 21:42:05 2022
% 0.48/0.80 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------