TSTP Solution File: FLD064-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : FLD064-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 05:08:08 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.00s 1.19s
% Output   : Refutation 6.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  22   ~;  25   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f84504,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f84487,f30]) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_3) ).

fof(f84487,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity),
    inference(resolution,[],[f5879,f29818]) ).

fof(f29818,plain,
    equalish(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f29798,f22]) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equalish(X1,X0)
      | equalish(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_equality) ).

fof(f29798,plain,
    equalish(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity),
    inference(resolution,[],[f29790,f1540]) ).

fof(f1540,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ equalish(X0,add(a,additive_inverse(a)))
      | equalish(X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f23,f125]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    equalish(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),additive_identity),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3,f28]) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | equalish(add(X0,additive_inverse(X0)),additive_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

fof(f23,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equalish(X1,X2)
      | ~ equalish(X0,X1)
      | equalish(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_equality) ).

fof(f29790,plain,
    equalish(additive_inverse(a),add(a,additive_inverse(a))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f29777,f22]) ).

fof(f29777,plain,
    equalish(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),additive_inverse(a)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f29776,f5902]) ).

fof(f5902,plain,
    less_or_equal(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),additive_inverse(a)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f5861,f126]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    equalish(additive_identity,add(a,additive_inverse(a))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f125,f22]) ).

fof(f5861,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ equalish(additive_identity,X0)
      | less_or_equal(X0,additive_inverse(a)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f5852,f26]) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less_or_equal(X0,X2)
      | ~ equalish(X0,X1)
      | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation) ).

fof(f5852,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f5783,f30]) ).

fof(f5783,plain,
    ( less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a))
    | less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1943,f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    defined(additive_inverse(a)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f12,f28]) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | defined(additive_inverse(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',well_definedness_of_additive_inverse) ).

fof(f1943,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | less_or_equal(additive_identity,X0)
      | less_or_equal(X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f18,f11]) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',well_definedness_of_additive_identity) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ defined(X1)
      | ~ defined(X0)
      | less_or_equal(X1,X0)
      | less_or_equal(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',totality_of_order_relation) ).

fof(f29776,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),additive_inverse(a))
    | equalish(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),additive_inverse(a)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f29760,f16]) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,X0)
      | ~ less_or_equal(X0,X1)
      | equalish(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_of_order_relation) ).

fof(f29760,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a),add(a,additive_inverse(a))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3928,f79]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    equalish(add(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a)),additive_inverse(a)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2,f31]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | equalish(add(additive_identity,X0),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

fof(f3928,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ equalish(add(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a)),X0)
      | less_or_equal(X0,add(a,additive_inverse(a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3838,f26]) ).

fof(f3838,plain,
    less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a)),add(a,additive_inverse(a))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3695,f31]) ).

fof(f3695,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,X0),add(a,X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f19,f29]) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_2) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less_or_equal(X0,X1)
      | ~ defined(X2)
      | less_or_equal(add(X0,X2),add(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) ).

fof(f5879,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ equalish(additive_identity,X0)
      | less_or_equal(X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f5851,f26]) ).

fof(f5851,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f5736]) ).

fof(f5736,plain,
    ( less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1943,f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : FLD064-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 19:46:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  % (2470)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37  % (2472)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2471)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2473)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2475)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2476)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2474)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2477)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.39  TRYING [4]
% 0.14/0.39  TRYING [4]
% 0.14/0.39  TRYING [4]
% 0.14/0.40  TRYING [4]
% 0.14/0.43  TRYING [5]
% 0.14/0.43  TRYING [5]
% 0.14/0.43  TRYING [5]
% 0.21/0.45  TRYING [5]
% 0.21/0.51  TRYING [6]
% 0.21/0.53  TRYING [6]
% 0.21/0.55  TRYING [6]
% 1.47/0.55  TRYING [6]
% 2.05/0.64  TRYING [7]
% 2.20/0.66  TRYING [7]
% 2.20/0.72  TRYING [7]
% 2.65/0.75  TRYING [7]
% 4.16/0.94  TRYING [8]
% 4.33/0.97  TRYING [8]
% 4.77/1.03  TRYING [8]
% 5.76/1.19  % (2475)First to succeed.
% 5.76/1.19  % (2475)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2470"
% 6.00/1.19  % (2475)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 6.00/1.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 6.00/1.19  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 6.00/1.19  % (2475)------------------------------
% 6.00/1.19  % (2475)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 6.00/1.19  % (2475)Termination reason: Refutation
% 6.00/1.19  
% 6.00/1.19  % (2475)Memory used [KB]: 24276
% 6.00/1.19  % (2475)Time elapsed: 0.817 s
% 6.00/1.19  % (2475)Instructions burned: 2625 (million)
% 6.00/1.19  % (2470)Success in time 0.812 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------