TSTP Solution File: FLD016-5 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : FLD016-5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:36:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 47.08s 6.35s
% Output : Proof 47.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : FLD016-5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 23:51:25 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 47.08/6.35 Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 47.08/6.35
% 47.08/6.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 47.08/6.35
% 47.16/6.36 % SZS output start Proof
% 47.16/6.37 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 47.16/6.37 fof(a_is_defined, hypothesis, defined(a)).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(associativity_addition_1, axiom, ![X, V, W, Y, U, Z]: (sum(X, V, W) | (~sum(X, Y, U) | (~sum(Y, Z, V) | ~sum(U, Z, W))))).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(associativity_addition_2, axiom, ![X2, Y2, Z2, V2, W2, U2]: (sum(U2, Z2, W2) | (~sum(X2, Y2, U2) | (~sum(Y2, Z2, V2) | ~sum(X2, V2, W2))))).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(commutativity_addition, axiom, ![X2, Y2, Z2]: (sum(Y2, X2, Z2) | ~sum(X2, Y2, Z2))).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(existence_of_identity_addition, axiom, ![X2]: (sum(additive_identity, X2, X2) | ~defined(X2))).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(existence_of_inverse_addition, axiom, ![X2]: (sum(additive_inverse(X2), X2, additive_identity) | ~defined(X2))).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(not_sum_9, negated_conjecture, ~sum(additive_identity, u, v)).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(sum_6, negated_conjecture, sum(a, u, q)).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(sum_7, negated_conjecture, sum(a, v, r)).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(sum_8, negated_conjecture, sum(additive_identity, q, r)).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(u_is_defined, hypothesis, defined(u)).
% 47.16/6.37 fof(v_is_defined, hypothesis, defined(v)).
% 47.16/6.37
% 47.16/6.37 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 47.16/6.37 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 47.16/6.37 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 47.16/6.37 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 47.16/6.37 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 47.16/6.37 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 47.16/6.37 variables of u and v.
% 47.16/6.37 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 47.16/6.37 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 47.16/6.37
% 47.16/6.37 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 47.16/6.37
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 1 (a_is_defined): defined(a) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 2 (u_is_defined): defined(u) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 3 (v_is_defined): defined(v) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 4 (existence_of_identity_addition): fresh14(X, X, Y) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 5 (existence_of_inverse_addition): fresh12(X, X, Y) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 6 (sum_6): sum(a, u, q) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 7 (sum_7): sum(a, v, r) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 8 (sum_8): sum(additive_identity, q, r) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 9 (existence_of_identity_addition): fresh14(defined(X), true, X) = sum(additive_identity, X, X).
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 10 (existence_of_inverse_addition): fresh12(defined(X), true, X) = sum(additive_inverse(X), X, additive_identity).
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 11 (associativity_addition_1): fresh44(X, X, Y, Z, W) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 12 (associativity_addition_2): fresh42(X, X, Y, Z, W) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 13 (commutativity_addition): fresh18(X, X, Y, Z, W) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 14 (associativity_addition_1): fresh22(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U) = sum(Y, Z, W).
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 15 (associativity_addition_2): fresh21(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U) = sum(Y, Z, W).
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 16 (associativity_addition_1): fresh43(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U, T) = fresh44(sum(Y, V, U), true, Y, Z, W).
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 17 (associativity_addition_2): fresh41(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U, T) = fresh42(sum(V, U, Y), true, Y, Z, W).
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 18 (commutativity_addition): fresh18(sum(X, Y, Z), true, Y, X, Z) = sum(Y, X, Z).
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 19 (associativity_addition_1): fresh43(sum(X, Y, Z), true, W, V, Z, U, X, Y) = fresh22(sum(U, Y, V), true, W, V, Z, U, X).
% 47.16/6.37 Axiom 20 (associativity_addition_2): fresh41(sum(X, Y, Z), true, W, Y, V, U, X, Z) = fresh21(sum(U, Z, V), true, W, Y, V, U, X).
% 47.16/6.37
% 47.16/6.37 Goal 1 (not_sum_9): sum(additive_identity, u, v) = true.
% 47.16/6.37 Proof:
% 47.16/6.37 sum(additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 18 (commutativity_addition) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(sum(u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 15 (associativity_addition_2) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(true, true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 11 (associativity_addition_1) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh44(true, true, additive_inverse(a), r, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 5 (existence_of_inverse_addition) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh44(fresh12(true, true, a), true, additive_inverse(a), r, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 1 (a_is_defined) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh44(fresh12(defined(a), true, a), true, additive_inverse(a), r, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 10 (existence_of_inverse_addition) }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh44(sum(additive_inverse(a), a, additive_identity), true, additive_inverse(a), r, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 16 (associativity_addition_1) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh43(true, true, additive_inverse(a), r, v, a, additive_identity, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 4 (existence_of_identity_addition) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh43(fresh14(true, true, v), true, additive_inverse(a), r, v, a, additive_identity, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 3 (v_is_defined) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh43(fresh14(defined(v), true, v), true, additive_inverse(a), r, v, a, additive_identity, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 9 (existence_of_identity_addition) }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh43(sum(additive_identity, v, v), true, additive_inverse(a), r, v, a, additive_identity, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 19 (associativity_addition_1) }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh22(sum(a, v, r), true, additive_inverse(a), r, v, a, additive_identity), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 7 (sum_7) }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(fresh22(true, true, additive_inverse(a), r, v, a, additive_identity), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 14 (associativity_addition_1) }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh21(sum(additive_inverse(a), r, v), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 20 (associativity_addition_2) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh41(sum(q, additive_identity, r), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q, r), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 18 (commutativity_addition) R->L }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh41(fresh18(sum(additive_identity, q, r), true, q, additive_identity, r), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q, r), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 8 (sum_8) }
% 47.16/6.37 fresh18(fresh41(fresh18(true, true, q, additive_identity, r), true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q, r), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.37 = { by axiom 13 (commutativity_addition) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh41(true, true, u, additive_identity, v, additive_inverse(a), q, r), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 17 (associativity_addition_2) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(sum(additive_inverse(a), q, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 14 (associativity_addition_1) R->L }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh22(true, true, additive_inverse(a), q, u, a, additive_identity), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 6 (sum_6) R->L }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh22(sum(a, u, q), true, additive_inverse(a), q, u, a, additive_identity), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 19 (associativity_addition_1) R->L }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh43(sum(additive_identity, u, u), true, additive_inverse(a), q, u, a, additive_identity, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 9 (existence_of_identity_addition) R->L }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh43(fresh14(defined(u), true, u), true, additive_inverse(a), q, u, a, additive_identity, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 2 (u_is_defined) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh43(fresh14(true, true, u), true, additive_inverse(a), q, u, a, additive_identity, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 4 (existence_of_identity_addition) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh43(true, true, additive_inverse(a), q, u, a, additive_identity, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 16 (associativity_addition_1) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh44(sum(additive_inverse(a), a, additive_identity), true, additive_inverse(a), q, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 10 (existence_of_inverse_addition) R->L }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh44(fresh12(defined(a), true, a), true, additive_inverse(a), q, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 1 (a_is_defined) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh44(fresh12(true, true, a), true, additive_inverse(a), q, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 5 (existence_of_inverse_addition) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(fresh44(true, true, additive_inverse(a), q, u), true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 11 (associativity_addition_1) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(fresh42(true, true, u, additive_identity, v), true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 12 (associativity_addition_2) }
% 47.16/6.38 fresh18(true, true, additive_identity, u, v)
% 47.16/6.38 = { by axiom 13 (commutativity_addition) }
% 47.16/6.38 true
% 47.16/6.38 % SZS output end Proof
% 47.16/6.38
% 47.16/6.38 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------