TSTP Solution File: FLD008-4 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : FLD008-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:54:43 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.77s 0.94s
% Output : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 19 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 14 ~; 9 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 17 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f235,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f220,f103]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
sum(additive_inverse(a),c,b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f45,f31,f54,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( sum(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
| ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
| ~ sum(X4,X5,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_addition_1) ).
fof(f54,plain,
sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f27,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity)
| ~ defined(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).
fof(f27,axiom,
defined(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).
fof(f31,axiom,
sum(a,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_5) ).
fof(f45,plain,
sum(additive_identity,b,b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f28,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] :
( sum(additive_identity,X0,X0)
| ~ defined(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_identity_addition) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
defined(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_is_defined) ).
fof(f220,plain,
~ sum(additive_inverse(a),c,b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f55,f62,f117,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( sum(X4,X5,X2)
| ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
| ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
| ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_addition_2) ).
fof(f117,plain,
~ sum(d,c,additive_identity),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f114,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X5] :
( sum(X3,X0,X5)
| ~ sum(X0,X3,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_addition) ).
fof(f114,plain,
~ sum(c,d,additive_identity),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f47,f63,f56,f1]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
sum(additive_inverse(c),c,additive_identity),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f29,f4]) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
defined(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_is_defined) ).
fof(f63,plain,
~ sum(additive_inverse(c),additive_identity,d),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f33,f5]) ).
fof(f33,axiom,
~ sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(c),d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_7) ).
fof(f47,plain,
sum(additive_identity,d,d),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f30,f3]) ).
fof(f30,axiom,
defined(d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d_is_defined) ).
fof(f62,plain,
sum(additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(a),d),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f32,f5]) ).
fof(f32,axiom,
sum(additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b),d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_6) ).
fof(f55,plain,
sum(additive_inverse(b),b,additive_identity),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f28,f4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : FLD008-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat May 18 21:53:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.72/0.93 % (14933)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.72/0.93 % (14935)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.93 % (14931)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.93 % (14934)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.72/0.93 % (14936)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.72/0.93 % (14932)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.72/0.93 % (14937)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.72/0.93 % (14938)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.72/0.94 % (14934)First to succeed.
% 0.72/0.94 % (14934)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-14930"
% 0.77/0.94 % (14937)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.77/0.94 % (14934)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.77/0.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.77/0.94 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.77/0.94 % (14934)------------------------------
% 0.77/0.94 % (14934)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.77/0.94 % (14934)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.77/0.94
% 0.77/0.94 % (14934)Memory used [KB]: 1089
% 0.77/0.94 % (14934)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.77/0.94 % (14934)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.77/0.94 % (14930)Success in time 0.555 s
% 0.77/0.94 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------