TSTP Solution File: DAT334_21 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT334_21 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:24 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.91s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : DAT334_21 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:12:45 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.91/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.91/1.72  
% 2.91/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.91/1.74  %$ teach > #nlpp > sue > psych > math > mary > john > cs > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_4 > #skF_1
% 2.91/1.74  
% 2.91/1.74  %Foreground sorts:
% 2.91/1.74  tff($ki_world, type, $ki_world: $tType ).
% 2.91/1.74  
% 2.91/1.74  %Background operators:
% 2.91/1.74  
% 2.91/1.74  
% 2.91/1.74  %Foreground operators:
% 2.91/1.74  tff(sue, type, sue: $i).
% 2.91/1.74  tff(psych, type, psych: $i).
% 2.91/1.74  tff(teach, type, teach: ($ki_world * $i * $i) > $o).
% 2.91/1.74  tff(math, type, math: $i).
% 2.91/1.74  tff('#skF_3', type, '#skF_3': $ki_world > $i).
% 2.91/1.74  tff('#skF_2', type, '#skF_2': $ki_world > $i).
% 2.91/1.74  tff(mary, type, mary: $i).
% 2.91/1.74  tff(john, type, john: $i).
% 2.91/1.74  tff('#skF_4', type, '#skF_4': $ki_world).
% 2.91/1.74  tff('#skF_1', type, '#skF_1': $ki_world > $ki_world).
% 2.91/1.74  tff(cs, type, cs: $i).
% 2.91/1.74  
% 2.91/1.75  tff(f_61, negated_conjecture, ~(![W:$ki_world]: ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, W) => (?[X]: ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(W, X) & teach(W, X, cs))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', verify)).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(f_53, axiom, (![W:$ki_world]: ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, W) => (((teach(W, john, math) & (?[X]: ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(W, X) & teach(W, X, cs)))) & teach(W, mary, psych)) & teach(W, sue, psych)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', db)).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(c_20, plain, ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, '#skF_4')), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_61])).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(c_14, plain, (![W_8:$ki_world]: ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(W_8, '#skF_3'(W_8)) | ~$ki_accessible($ki_local_world, W_8))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_53])).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(c_28, plain, (![W_19:$ki_world]: (teach(W_19, '#skF_3'(W_19), cs) | ~$ki_accessible($ki_local_world, W_19))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_53])).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(c_18, plain, (![X_11]: (~teach('#skF_4', X_11, cs) | ~$ki_exists_in_world_$i('#skF_4', X_11))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_61])).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(c_32, plain, (~$ki_exists_in_world_$i('#skF_4', '#skF_3'('#skF_4')) | ~$ki_accessible($ki_local_world, '#skF_4')), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_28, c_18])).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(c_35, plain, (~$ki_exists_in_world_$i('#skF_4', '#skF_3'('#skF_4'))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_20, c_32])).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(c_38, plain, (~$ki_accessible($ki_local_world, '#skF_4')), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_14, c_35])).
% 2.91/1.75  tff(c_42, plain, $false, inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_20, c_38])).
% 2.91/1.75  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.91/1.75  
% 2.91/1.75  Inference rules
% 2.91/1.75  ----------------------
% 2.91/1.75  #Ref     : 0
% 2.91/1.75  #Sup     : 2
% 2.91/1.75  #Fact    : 0
% 2.91/1.75  #Define  : 0
% 2.91/1.75  #Split   : 0
% 2.91/1.75  #Chain   : 0
% 2.91/1.75  #Close   : 0
% 2.91/1.75  
% 2.91/1.75  Ordering : KBO
% 2.91/1.75  
% 2.91/1.75  Simplification rules
% 2.91/1.75  ----------------------
% 2.91/1.75  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.91/1.75  #Demod        : 2
% 2.91/1.75  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.91/1.75  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.91/1.75  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.91/1.75  
% 2.91/1.75  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.91/1.75  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.91/1.75  
% 2.91/1.75  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.91/1.75  ----------------------
% 2.91/1.75  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 2.91/1.75  Parsing              : 0.28
% 2.91/1.75  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.91/1.75  Main loop            : 0.16
% 2.91/1.75  Inferencing          : 0.08
% 2.91/1.75  Reduction            : 0.03
% 2.91/1.75  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.91/1.75  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.91/1.75  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 2.91/1.75  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.91/1.75  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.91/1.75  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.91/1.75  Total                : 0.67
% 2.91/1.75  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.91/1.75  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.91/1.75  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.91/1.75  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------