TSTP Solution File: DAT280^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : DAT280^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:50:28 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.15 % Problem : DAT280^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.08/0.18 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.39 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % DateTime : Sun May 19 23:45:23 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.40 This is a TH1_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.17/0.40 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.42 % (18846)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18845)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18843)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18841)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18840)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.25/0.42 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.25/0.42 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.25/0.42 % (18839)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)First to succeed.
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.25/0.42
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.42 % (18842)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.42 % (18845)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.25/0.42 % (18840)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.25/0.42 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.42 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.42 thf(type_def_6, type, 'type/ind_types/list': ($tType) > $tType).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(type_def_7, type, sK0: $tType).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(type_def_8, type, sK1: $tType).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(type_def_9, type, sK2: $tType).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(func_def_0, type, 'type/ind_types/list': ($tType) > $tType).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(func_def_1, type, 'const/lists/ITLIST2': !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType, X2: $tType]:((X0 > X1 > X2 > X2) > 'type/ind_types/list' @ X0 > 'type/ind_types/list' @ X1 > X2 > X2)).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(func_def_2, type, 'const/ind_types/NIL': !>[X0: $tType]:('type/ind_types/list' @ X0)).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(func_def_6, type, sK3: sK0 > sK1 > sK2 > sK2).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(func_def_7, type, sK4: sK2).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(func_def_9, type, ph6: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.25/0.42 $false),
% 0.25/0.42 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f9,f8])).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.25/0.42 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X0 > X1 > X2 > X2,X4 : 'type/ind_types/list' @ X1,X5 : X2] : ((('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X0 @ X4 @ X5) = X5)) )),
% 0.25/0.42 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.25/0.42 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X0 > X1 > X2 > X2,X4 : 'type/ind_types/list' @ X1,X5 : X2] : (('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X0 @ X4 @ X5) = X5)),
% 0.25/0.42 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/lists/ITLIST2_DEF_0')).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.25/0.42 (sK4 != ('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ sK0 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ sK1 @ sK4))),
% 0.25/0.42 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.25/0.42 (sK4 != ('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ sK0 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ sK1 @ sK4))),
% 0.25/0.42 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f5,f6])).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.25/0.42 ? [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X0 > X1 > X2 > X2,X4 : X2] : (('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X0 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X1 @ X4) != X4) => (sK4 != ('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ sK0 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ sK1 @ sK4))),
% 0.25/0.42 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.25/0.42 ? [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X0 > X1 > X2 > X2,X4 : X2] : (('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X0 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X1 @ X4) != X4)),
% 0.25/0.42 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.25/0.42 ~! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X0 > X1 > X2 > X2,X4 : X2] : (('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X0 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X1 @ X4) = X4)),
% 0.25/0.42 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])).
% 0.25/0.42 thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 0.25/0.42 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X0 > X1 > X2 > X2,X4 : X2] : (('const/lists/ITLIST2' @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X0 @ 'const/ind_types/NIL' @ X1 @ X4) = X4)),
% 0.25/0.42 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/lists/ITLIST2_0')).
% 0.25/0.42 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.25/0.42
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.42 % (18844)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.42 % (18838)Success in time 0.018 s
% 0.25/0.42 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------