TSTP Solution File: DAT094_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT094_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:08 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.27s 2.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  12 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  25   ~;  23   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  136 (  42 atm;  19 fun;  64 num;  11 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :   25 (  14   >;  11   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (;  44   !;   0   ?;  44   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ inRange > in > count > cons > append > #nlpp > tail > length > head > nil > #skF_4 > #skF_1 > #skF_2 > #skF_6 > #skF_3 > #skF_5

%Foreground sorts:
tff(list,type,
    list: $tType ).

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(inRange,type,
    inRange: ( $int * list ) > $o ).

tff(tail,type,
    tail: list > list ).

tff(nil,type,
    nil: list ).

tff(head,type,
    head: list > $int ).

tff(length,type,
    length: list > $int ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff(append,type,
    append: ( list * list ) > list ).

tff(count,type,
    count: ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff(cons,type,
    cons: ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $int * list ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff(f_70,axiom,
    length(nil) = 0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).

tff(f_87,axiom,
    ! [L: list] : ( append(nil,L) = L ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l_6) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [Ia: $int,K: list,L: list] : ( append(cons(Ia,K),L) = cons(Ia,append(K,L)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l_7) ).

tff(f_72,axiom,
    ! [Ha: $int,T: list] : ( length(cons(Ha,T)) = $sum(1,length(T)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l_1) ).

tff(f_101,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ! [K: list,L: list] :
          ( ( $greater(length(K),1)
            & $greater(length(L),1) )
         => $greater(length(append(K,L)),4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c) ).

tff(c_66,plain,
    length(nil) = 0,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [L_41: list] : ( append(nil,L_41) = L_41 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_87]) ).

tff(c_229,plain,
    ! [I_83a: $int,K_84: list,L_85: list] : ( cons(I_83a,append(K_84,L_85)) = append(cons(I_83a,K_84),L_85) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_307,plain,
    ! [I_95a: $int,L_96: list] : ( cons(I_95a,L_96) = append(cons(I_95a,nil),L_96) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_46,c_229]) ).

tff(c_65,plain,
    ! [H_30a: $int,T_31: list] : ( length(cons(H_30a,T_31)) = $sum(1,length(T_31)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_72]) ).

tff(c_384,plain,
    ! [I_95a: $int,L_96: list] : ( length(append(cons(I_95a,nil),L_96)) = $sum(1,length(L_96)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_307,c_65]) ).

tff(c_1000,plain,
    ! [I_187a: $int,K_188: list,L_189: list] : ( length(append(cons(I_187a,K_188),L_189)) = $sum(1,length(append(K_188,L_189))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_229,c_65]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    ! [K_47: list,L_48: list] :
      ( $greater(length(append(K_47,L_48)),4)
      | ~ $greater(length(L_48),1)
      | ~ $greater(length(K_47),1) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_101]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    ! [K_47: list,L_48: list] :
      ( $less(4,length(append(K_47,L_48)))
      | ~ $less(1,length(L_48))
      | ~ $less(1,length(K_47)) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_56]) ).

tff(c_1010,plain,
    ! [K_188: list,L_189: list,I_187a: $int] :
      ( $less(4,$sum(1,length(append(K_188,L_189))))
      | ~ $less(1,length(L_189))
      | ~ $less(1,length(cons(I_187a,K_188))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1000,c_58]) ).

tff(c_1029,plain,
    ! [K_188: list,L_189: list] :
      ( $less(4,$sum(1,length(append(K_188,L_189))))
      | ~ $less(1,length(L_189))
      | ~ $less(1,$sum(1,length(K_188))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_65,c_1010]) ).

tff(c_1299,plain,
    ! [K_199: list,L_200: list] :
      ( $less(3,length(append(K_199,L_200)))
      | ~ $less(1,length(L_200))
      | ~ $less(0,length(K_199)) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_1029]) ).

tff(c_1311,plain,
    ! [L_96: list,I_95a: $int] :
      ( $less(3,$sum(1,length(L_96)))
      | ~ $less(1,length(L_96))
      | ~ $less(0,length(cons(I_95a,nil))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_384,c_1299]) ).

tff(c_1327,plain,
    ! [L_96: list] :
      ( $less(3,$sum(1,length(L_96)))
      | ~ $less(1,length(L_96))
      | ~ $less(0,$sum(1,0)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_66,c_65,c_1311]) ).

tff(c_1338,plain,
    ! [L_201: list] :
      ( $less(2,length(L_201))
      | ~ $less(1,length(L_201)) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_1327]) ).

tff(c_1344,plain,
    ! [L_96: list,I_95a: $int] :
      ( $less(2,$sum(1,length(L_96)))
      | ~ $less(1,length(append(cons(I_95a,nil),L_96))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_384,c_1338]) ).

tff(c_1354,plain,
    ! [L_96: list] :
      ( $less(2,$sum(1,length(L_96)))
      | ~ $less(1,$sum(1,length(L_96))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_384,c_1344]) ).

tff(c_1363,plain,
    ! [L_202: list] :
      ( $less(1,length(L_202))
      | ~ $less(0,length(L_202)) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_1354]) ).

tff(c_1369,plain,
    ! [L_96: list,I_95a: $int] :
      ( $less(1,$sum(1,length(L_96)))
      | ~ $less(0,length(append(cons(I_95a,nil),L_96))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_384,c_1363]) ).

tff(c_1379,plain,
    ! [L_96: list] :
      ( $less(1,$sum(1,length(L_96)))
      | ~ $less(0,$sum(1,length(L_96))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_384,c_1369]) ).

tff(c_1439,plain,
    ! [L_205: list] :
      ( $less(0,length(L_205))
      | ~ $less($uminus(1),length(L_205)) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_1379]) ).

tff(c_1451,plain,
    ( $less(0,length(nil))
    | ~ $less($uminus(1),0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_66,c_1439]) ).

tff(c_1461,plain,
    ( $less(0,0)
    | ~ $less($uminus(1),0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_66,c_1451]) ).

tff(c_1464,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_1461]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : DAT094_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:07:23 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.27/2.26  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.27/2.27  
% 4.27/2.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.27/2.30  
% 4.27/2.30  Inference rules
% 4.27/2.30  ----------------------
% 4.27/2.30  #Ref     : 0
% 4.27/2.30  #Sup     : 286
% 4.27/2.30  #Fact    : 0
% 4.27/2.30  #Define  : 0
% 4.27/2.30  #Split   : 0
% 4.27/2.30  #Chain   : 0
% 4.27/2.30  #Close   : 0
% 4.27/2.30  
% 4.27/2.30  Ordering : LPO
% 4.27/2.30  
% 4.27/2.30  Simplification rules
% 4.27/2.30  ----------------------
% 4.27/2.30  #Subsume      : 24
% 4.27/2.30  #Demod        : 142
% 4.27/2.30  #Tautology    : 131
% 4.27/2.30  #SimpNegUnit  : 12
% 4.27/2.30  #BackRed      : 1
% 4.27/2.30  
% 4.27/2.30  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.27/2.30  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.27/2.30  
% 4.27/2.30  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.27/2.30  ----------------------
% 4.27/2.30  Preprocessing        : 0.60
% 4.27/2.30  Parsing              : 0.32
% 4.27/2.30  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 4.27/2.30  Main loop            : 0.57
% 4.27/2.30  Inferencing          : 0.20
% 4.27/2.30  Reduction            : 0.18
% 4.27/2.30  Demodulation         : 0.13
% 4.27/2.30  BG Simplification    : 0.07
% 4.27/2.30  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 4.27/2.30  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 4.27/2.30  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.27/2.30  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.27/2.30  Total                : 1.22
% 4.27/2.30  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.27/2.30  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.27/2.30  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.27/2.30  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------