TSTP Solution File: DAT077_1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : DAT077_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.42s 1.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 5 unt; 18 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 3 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 25 ( 10 atm; 0 fun; 4 num; 11 var)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 37 ( 17 >; 20 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 14 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 (; 14 !; 1 ?; 15 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ inRange > sorted > distinct > write > rev > read > max > #nlpp > init > #skF_5 > #skF_9 > #skF_4 > #skF_8 > #skF_1 > #skF_6 > #skF_3 > #skF_7 > #skF_2
%Foreground sorts:
tff(array,type,
array: $tType ).
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(sorted,type,
sorted: ( array * $int ) > $o ).
tff(rev,type,
rev: ( array * $int ) > array ).
tff('#skF_5',type,
'#skF_5': ( array * $int * $int ) > $int ).
tff(write,type,
write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).
tff(init,type,
init: $int > array ).
tff('#skF_9',type,
'#skF_9': $int > $int ).
tff('#skF_4',type,
'#skF_4': ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff('#skF_8',type,
'#skF_8': ( array * array * $int ) > $int ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': ( array * array ) > $int ).
tff('#skF_6',type,
'#skF_6': ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff('#skF_3',type,
'#skF_3': ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(max,type,
max: ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(inRange,type,
inRange: ( array * $int * $int ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_7',type,
'#skF_7': ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(read,type,
read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(distinct,type,
distinct: ( array * $int ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': ( array * $int * $int ) > $int ).
tff(f_74,axiom,
! [A: array,Na: $int] :
( sorted(A,Na)
<=> ! [Ia: $int,Ja: $int] :
( ( $lesseq(0,Ia)
& $less(Ia,Na)
& $less(Ia,Ja)
& $less(Ja,Na) )
=> $lesseq(read(A,Ia),read(A,Ja)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sorted1) ).
tff(f_124,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ! [Ma: $int] :
? [Na: $int] : ~ sorted(rev(init(Na),Ma),Ma),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c5) ).
tff(c_144,plain,
! [A_66: array,N_67a: $int] :
( $less('#skF_3'(A_66,N_67a),N_67a)
| sorted(A_66,N_67a) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).
tff(c_73,plain,
! [M_45a: $int] : ~ sorted(rev(init('#skF_9'(M_45a)),M_45a),M_45a),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_124]) ).
tff(c_153,plain,
! [N_71a: $int] : $less('#skF_3'(rev(init('#skF_9'(N_71a)),N_71a),N_71a),N_71a),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_73]) ).
tff(c_29,plain,
! [A_19: array,N_20a: $int] :
( $lesseq(0,'#skF_3'(A_19,N_20a))
| sorted(A_19,N_20a) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).
tff(c_127,plain,
! [A_57: array,N_58a: $int] :
( ~ $less('#skF_3'(A_57,N_58a),0)
| sorted(A_57,N_58a) ),
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_29]) ).
tff(c_133,plain,
! [N_58a: $int] : ~ $less('#skF_3'(rev(init('#skF_9'(N_58a)),N_58a),N_58a),0),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_73]) ).
tff(c_158,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_133]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : DAT077_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 13:44:55 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 3.42/1.79 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.42/1.79
% 3.42/1.79 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.47/1.82
% 3.47/1.82 Inference rules
% 3.47/1.82 ----------------------
% 3.47/1.82 #Ref : 0
% 3.47/1.82 #Sup : 8
% 3.47/1.82 #Fact : 0
% 3.47/1.82 #Define : 0
% 3.47/1.82 #Split : 0
% 3.47/1.82 #Chain : 0
% 3.47/1.82 #Close : 0
% 3.47/1.82
% 3.47/1.82 Ordering : LPO
% 3.47/1.82
% 3.47/1.82 Simplification rules
% 3.47/1.82 ----------------------
% 3.47/1.82 #Subsume : 0
% 3.47/1.82 #Demod : 0
% 3.47/1.82 #Tautology : 4
% 3.47/1.82 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 3.47/1.82 #BackRed : 0
% 3.47/1.82
% 3.47/1.82 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.47/1.82 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.47/1.82
% 3.47/1.82 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.47/1.82 ----------------------
% 3.51/1.82 Preprocessing : 0.64
% 3.51/1.82 Parsing : 0.31
% 3.51/1.82 CNF conversion : 0.04
% 3.51/1.82 Main loop : 0.19
% 3.51/1.82 Inferencing : 0.06
% 3.51/1.82 Reduction : 0.06
% 3.51/1.82 Demodulation : 0.04
% 3.51/1.82 BG Simplification : 0.06
% 3.51/1.82 Subsumption : 0.04
% 3.51/1.82 Abstraction : 0.01
% 3.51/1.82 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.51/1.82 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.51/1.82 Total : 0.87
% 3.51/1.82 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.51/1.82 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.51/1.82 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.51/1.82 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------