TSTP Solution File: DAT066_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : DAT066_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:14:20 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.87s 1.12s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : DAT066_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 18:41:12 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.87/1.12 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.87/1.12 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 ------ iProver source info
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.87/1.12 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.87/1.12 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Parsing...
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Proving...
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 clauses 31
% 2.87/1.12 conjectures 2
% 2.87/1.12 EPR 7
% 2.87/1.12 Horn 26
% 2.87/1.12 unary 20
% 2.87/1.12 binary 7
% 2.87/1.12 lits 46
% 2.87/1.12 lits eq 25
% 2.87/1.12 fd_pure 0
% 2.87/1.12 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.87/1.12 fd_cond 0
% 2.87/1.12 fd_pseudo_cond 5
% 2.87/1.12 AC symbols 1
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 ------
% 2.87/1.12 Current options:
% 2.87/1.12 ------
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 ------ Proving...
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f2,axiom,(
% 2.87/1.12 ! [X1 : heap,X0 : $int,X2 : $int] : ($sum(1,length(X1)) = X0 => sel(app(X1,X2),X0) = X2)),
% 2.87/1.12 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_2)).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f15,conjecture,(
% 2.87/1.12 ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X1)) != X0 | sel(app(X1,X2),X0) = X2)),
% 2.87/1.12 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',th_1)).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f16,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.87/1.12 ~! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X1)) != X0 | sel(app(X1,X2),X0) = X2)),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f29,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 ! [X0 : heap,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : ($sum(1,length(X0)) = X1 => sel(app(X0,X2),X1) = X2)),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f41,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 ~! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X2)) != X1 | sel(app(X2,X0),X1) = X0)),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(rectify,[],[f16])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f42,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 ! [X0 : heap,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : (sel(app(X0,X2),X1) = X2 | $sum(1,length(X0)) != X1)),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f46,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X2)) = X1 & sel(app(X2,X0),X1) != X0)),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f41])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f51,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X2)) = X1 & sel(app(X2,X0),X1) != X0) => (sK1 = $sum(1,length(sK2)) & sK0 != sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1))),
% 2.87/1.12 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f52,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 sK1 = $sum(1,length(sK2)) & sK0 != sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1)),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f46,f51])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f54,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : heap,X1 : $int] : (sel(app(X0,X2),X1) = X2 | $sum(1,length(X0)) != X1) )),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f71,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 sK0 != sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1)),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f72,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 sK1 = $sum(1,length(sK2))),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 tff(f73,plain,(
% 2.87/1.12 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : heap] : (sel(app(X0,X2),$sum(1,length(X0))) = X2) )),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f54])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 cnf(c_62,plain,
% 2.87/1.12 (sel(app(X0_13,X0_3),$sum_int(1,length(X0_13))) = X0_3),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f73])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
% 2.87/1.12 ($sum_int(1,length(sK2)) = sK1),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
% 2.87/1.12 (sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1) != sK0),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 cnf(c_1474,plain,
% 2.87/1.12 (sel(app(sK2,X0_3),sK1) = X0_3),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_62])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 cnf(c_1477,plain,
% 2.87/1.12 ($false),
% 2.87/1.12 inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_1474])).
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.87/1.12
% 2.87/1.12
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------