TSTP Solution File: DAT062_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT062_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.26s 1.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  19 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (   9   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   25 (  10 atm;   5 fun;   5 num;   5 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   5   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (;  16   !;   0   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ lsls > app > #nlpp > toop > length > get > empty > #skF_1 > #skF_3

%Foreground sorts:
tff(heap,type,
    heap: $tType ).

%Background operators:
tff('#skE_2',type,
    '#skE_2': $int ).

tff('#skE_1',type,
    '#skE_1': $int ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $int ).

%Foreground operators:
tff(toop,type,
    toop: heap > $int ).

tff(lsls,type,
    lsls: ( heap * heap ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': heap ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: heap ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': heap ).

tff(get,type,
    get: heap > heap ).

tff(app,type,
    app: ( heap * $int ) > heap ).

tff(length,type,
    length: heap > $int ).

tff(f_75,axiom,
    ! [Na: $int,H: heap] : ( length(app(H,Na)) = $sum(1,length(H)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT005_0.ax',ax_23) ).

tff(f_107,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [H: heap,Na: $int] :
        ( ~ ! [H0: heap] :
              ( lsls(H0,H)
             => $less(length(H0),length(H)) )
        | ! [H0: heap] :
            ( lsls(H0,app(H,Na))
           => $less(length(H0),length(app(H,Na))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',th_lem_1a) ).

tff(f_93,axiom,
    ! [Na: $int,H0: heap,H: heap] :
      ( lsls(H0,app(H,Na))
    <=> ( ( H0 = H )
        | lsls(H0,H) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/DAT005_0.ax',ax_27) ).

tff(c_49,plain,
    ! [H_13: heap,N_12a: $int] : ( length(app(H_13,N_12a)) = $sum(1,length(H_13)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_75]) ).

tff(c_45,plain,
    ~ $less(length('#skF_3'),length(app('#skF_1','#skF_2'))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_107]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    ~ $less(length('#skF_3'),$sum(1,length('#skF_1'))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_49,c_45]) ).

tff(c_97,plain,
    length('#skF_3') = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62]) ).

tff(c_41,plain,
    lsls('#skF_3',app('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_107]) ).

tff(c_204,plain,
    ! [H0_71: heap,H_72: heap,N_73a: $int] :
      ( lsls(H0_71,H_72)
      | ( H_72 = H0_71 )
      | ~ lsls(H0_71,app(H_72,N_73a)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_93]) ).

tff(c_216,plain,
    ( lsls('#skF_3','#skF_1')
    | ( '#skF_1' = '#skF_3' ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_204]) ).

tff(c_221,plain,
    '#skF_1' = '#skF_3',
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_216]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    length('#skF_1') = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62]) ).

tff(c_228,plain,
    length('#skF_3') = '#skE_2',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_221,c_98]) ).

tff(c_238,plain,
    '#skE_2' = '#skE_1',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_97,c_228]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    length('#skF_1') = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62]) ).

tff(c_93,plain,
    length('#skF_3') = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_1',$sum(1,'#skE_2')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_94,c_93,c_62]) ).

tff(c_245,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_1',$sum(1,'#skE_1')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_238,c_99]) ).

tff(c_248,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_245]) ).

tff(c_249,plain,
    lsls('#skF_3','#skF_1'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_216]) ).

tff(c_37,plain,
    ! [H0_24: heap] :
      ( $less(length(H0_24),length('#skF_1'))
      | ~ lsls(H0_24,'#skF_1') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_107]) ).

tff(c_117,plain,
    ! [H0_24: heap] :
      ( $less(length(H0_24),'#skE_2')
      | ~ lsls(H0_24,'#skF_1') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_98,c_37]) ).

tff(c_255,plain,
    $less(length('#skF_3'),'#skE_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_249,c_117]) ).

tff(c_259,plain,
    $less('#skE_1','#skE_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_97,c_255]) ).

tff(c_260,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_259,c_99]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : DAT062_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:30:16 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.26/1.86  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.26/1.87  
% 3.26/1.87  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  Inference rules
% 3.56/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.89  #Ref     : 2
% 3.56/1.89  #Sup     : 30
% 3.56/1.89  #Fact    : 0
% 3.56/1.89  #Define  : 2
% 3.56/1.89  #Split   : 1
% 3.56/1.89  #Chain   : 0
% 3.56/1.89  #Close   : 1
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  Ordering : LPO
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  Simplification rules
% 3.56/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.89  #Subsume      : 1
% 3.56/1.89  #Demod        : 13
% 3.56/1.89  #Tautology    : 24
% 3.56/1.89  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 3.56/1.89  #BackRed      : 4
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.56/1.89  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.56/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.89  Preprocessing        : 0.56
% 3.56/1.90  Parsing              : 0.30
% 3.56/1.90  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.56/1.90  Main loop            : 0.29
% 3.56/1.90  Inferencing          : 0.08
% 3.56/1.90  Reduction            : 0.07
% 3.56/1.90  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 3.56/1.90  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.56/1.90  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.56/1.90  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.56/1.90  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.56/1.90  Cooper               : 0.03
% 3.56/1.90  Total                : 0.89
% 3.56/1.90  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.56/1.90  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.90  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.90  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------