TSTP Solution File: DAT057_1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : DAT057_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:49:29 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 4 unt; 11 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 27 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 15 ~; 6 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 18 ( 0 atm; 0 fun; 0 num; 18 var)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 3 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 28 !; 8 ?; 36 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
data: $tType ).
tff(type_def_6,type,
array: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
mkarray: array ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
none: data ).
tff(func_def_2,type,
put: ( array * $int * data ) > array ).
tff(func_def_3,type,
get: ( array * $int ) > data ).
tff(func_def_4,type,
sK0: data ).
tff(func_def_5,type,
sK1: array ).
tff(func_def_6,type,
sK2: $int ).
tff(func_def_7,type,
sK3: $int ).
tff(func_def_8,type,
sK4: ( array * array ) > $int ).
tff(f31,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f30,f22]) ).
tff(f22,plain,
sK2 != sK3,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
( ( sK2 != sK3 )
& ( get(sK1,sK3) != get(put(sK1,sK2,sK0),sK3) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f13,f15]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
( ? [X0: data,X1: array,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
( ( X2 != X3 )
& ( get(X1,X3) != get(put(X1,X2,X0),X3) ) )
=> ( ( sK2 != sK3 )
& ( get(sK1,sK3) != get(put(sK1,sK2,sK0),sK3) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
? [X0: data,X1: array,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
( ( X2 != X3 )
& ( get(X1,X3) != get(put(X1,X2,X0),X3) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
~ ! [X0: data,X1: array,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
( ( X2 = X3 )
| ( get(X1,X3) = get(put(X1,X2,X0),X3) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
tff(f7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X2: data,X1: array,X0: $int,X3: $int] :
( ( X0 = X3 )
| ( get(X1,X3) = get(put(X1,X0,X2),X3) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,conjecture,
! [X2: data,X1: array,X0: $int,X3: $int] :
( ( X0 = X3 )
| ( get(X1,X3) = get(put(X1,X0,X2),X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',th_lem_1) ).
tff(f30,plain,
sK2 = sK3,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f29]) ).
tff(f29,plain,
( ( get(sK1,sK3) != get(sK1,sK3) )
| ( sK2 = sK3 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f21,f24]) ).
tff(f24,plain,
! [X2: array,X3: $int,X0: $int,X1: data] :
( ( get(put(X2,X0,X1),X3) = get(X2,X3) )
| ( X0 = X3 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
! [X0: $int,X1: data,X2: array,X3: $int] :
( ( get(put(X2,X0,X1),X3) = get(X2,X3) )
| ( X0 = X3 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
! [X0: $int,X1: data,X2: array,X3: $int] :
( ( X0 != X3 )
=> ( get(put(X2,X0,X1),X3) = get(X2,X3) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,axiom,
! [X3: $int,X2: data,X1: array,X0: $int] :
( ( X0 != X3 )
=> ( get(put(X1,X3,X2),X0) = get(X1,X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_19) ).
tff(f21,plain,
get(sK1,sK3) != get(put(sK1,sK2,sK0),sK3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : DAT057_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 23:38:23 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.31 This is a TF0_THM_EQU_ARI problem
% 0.09/0.31 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.77 % (18160)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18162)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18161)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18163)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18165)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18166)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18167)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18164)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.77
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)Memory used [KB]: 987
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18163)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.77 % (18160)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.77 % (18165)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.77 % (18167)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18167)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (18167)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18167)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.77
% 0.60/0.77 % (18167)Memory used [KB]: 973
% 0.60/0.77 % (18167)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.60/0.77 % (18167)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.60/0.77 % (18161)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (18164)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (18162)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.77 % (18166)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.78 % (18167)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78 % (18167)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78 % (18165)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-18159"
% 0.60/0.78 % (18165)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.78 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.78 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.78 % (18165)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78 % (18165)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.78 % (18165)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.78
% 0.60/0.78 % (18165)Memory used [KB]: 981
% 0.60/0.78 % (18165)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.78 % (18165)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.60/0.78 % (18159)Success in time 0.462 s
% 0.60/0.78 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------