TSTP Solution File: DAT013_1 by SPASS+T---2.2.22
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem : DAT013_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:31:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.75s 1.01s
% Output : Refutation 0.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : DAT013_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 17:48:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 % Using integer theory
% 0.75/1.01
% 0.75/1.01
% 0.75/1.01 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_9021_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.75/1.01
% 0.75/1.01 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices.
% 0.75/1.01 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.75/1.01 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_9021_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.75/1.01 SPASS derived 36 clauses, backtracked 5 clauses and kept 67 clauses.
% 0.75/1.01 SPASS backtracked 2 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.75/1.01 SPASS allocated 6259 KBytes.
% 0.75/1.01 SPASS spent 0:00:00.01 on the problem.
% 0.75/1.01 0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.75/1.01 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.75/1.01 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.75/1.01 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.75/1.01 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.75/1.01 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.75/1.01
% 0.75/1.01
% 0.75/1.01 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_9021_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.75/1.01
% 0.75/1.01 % Here is a proof with depth 3, length 19 :
% 0.75/1.01 4[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(skc8,skc6)*.
% 0.75/1.01 5[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(plus(skc7,3),skc8)*.
% 0.75/1.01 6[0:Inp] || greater(read(skc5,skc8),0)* -> .
% 0.75/1.01 9[0:Inp] || lesseq(U,skc6) lesseq(skc7,U) -> greater(read(skc5,U),0)*.
% 0.75/1.01 18[0:ThA] || -> equal(plus(U,0),U)**.
% 0.75/1.01 25[0:ThA] || -> lesseq(U,V) less(plus(W,V),plus(W,U))*.
% 0.75/1.01 42[0:ArS:6.0] || less(0,read(skc5,skc8))* -> .
% 0.75/1.01 43[0:TOC:42.0] || -> lesseq(read(skc5,skc8),0)*.
% 0.75/1.01 44[0:ArS:9.2] || lesseq(U,skc6) lesseq(skc7,U) -> less(0,read(skc5,U))*.
% 0.75/1.01 45[0:TOC:44.1] || -> less(U,skc7) less(skc6,U) less(0,read(skc5,U))*.
% 0.75/1.01 49[0:OCh:5.0,25.1] || -> lesseq(3,U) less(plus(skc7,U),skc8)*.
% 0.75/1.01 51[0:SpR:18.0,49.1] || -> lesseq(3,0) less(skc7,skc8)*.
% 0.75/1.01 57[0:ArS:51.0] || -> less(skc7,skc8)*.
% 0.75/1.01 77(e)[0:OCE:45.2,43.0] || -> less(skc8,skc7)* less(skc6,skc8).
% 0.75/1.01 80[1:Spt:77.0] || -> less(skc8,skc7)*.
% 0.75/1.01 81(e)[1:OCE:80.0,57.0] || -> .
% 0.75/1.01 84[1:Spt:81.0,77.0,80.0] || less(skc8,skc7)* -> .
% 0.75/1.01 85[1:Spt:81.0,77.1] || -> less(skc6,skc8)*.
% 0.75/1.01 89(e)[1:OCE:85.0,4.0] || -> .
% 0.75/1.01
% 0.75/1.01 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_9021_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.75/1.01
% 0.75/1.01 Formulae used in the proof : fof_co1 fof_ax1
% 0.75/1.03
% 0.75/1.03 SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------