TSTP Solution File: DAT009_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : DAT009_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:14:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 3.78s 1.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : DAT009_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 18:33:49 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.42 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.17/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.78/1.10 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 ------ iProver source info
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.78/1.10 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.78/1.10 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Parsing...
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Proving...
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 clauses 18
% 3.78/1.10 conjectures 3
% 3.78/1.10 EPR 5
% 3.78/1.10 Horn 15
% 3.78/1.10 unary 13
% 3.78/1.10 binary 3
% 3.78/1.10 lits 25
% 3.78/1.10 lits eq 11
% 3.78/1.10 fd_pure 0
% 3.78/1.10 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.78/1.10 fd_cond 0
% 3.78/1.10 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 3.78/1.10 AC symbols 1
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 ------
% 3.78/1.10 Current options:
% 3.78/1.10 ------
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 ------ Proving...
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f1,axiom,(
% 3.78/1.10 ! [X0 : array,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2),
% 3.78/1.10 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1)).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f2,axiom,(
% 3.78/1.10 ! [X3 : array,X4 : $int,X5 : $int,X6 : $int] : (read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) | X4 = X5)),
% 3.78/1.10 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2)).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f3,conjecture,(
% 3.78/1.10 ! [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : ((write(X1,X2,$sum(X2,3)) = X0 & ! [X3 : $int] : $greater(read(X1,X3),X3)) => ! [X4 : $int] : $greater(read(X0,X4),X4))),
% 3.78/1.10 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1)).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 3.78/1.10 ~! [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : ((write(X1,X2,$sum(X2,3)) = X0 & ! [X3 : $int] : $greater(read(X1,X3),X3)) => ! [X4 : $int] : $greater(read(X0,X4),X4))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f5,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ~! [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : ((write(X1,X2,$sum(X2,3)) = X0 & ! [X3 : $int] : $less(X3,read(X1,X3))) => ! [X4 : $int] : $less(X4,read(X0,X4)))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f4])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f18,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ! [X0 : array,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) | X1 = X2)),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f19,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : (? [X4 : $int] : ~$less(X4,read(X0,X4)) & (write(X1,X2,$sum(X2,3)) = X0 & ! [X3 : $int] : $less(X3,read(X1,X3))))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f20,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : (? [X4 : $int] : ~$less(X4,read(X0,X4)) & write(X1,X2,$sum(X2,3)) = X0 & ! [X3 : $int] : $less(X3,read(X1,X3)))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(flattening,[],[f19])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f21,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : (? [X3 : $int] : ~$less(X3,read(X0,X3)) & write(X1,X2,$sum(X2,3)) = X0 & ! [X4 : $int] : $less(X4,read(X1,X4)))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(rectify,[],[f20])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f22,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : (? [X3 : $int] : ~$less(X3,read(X0,X3)) & write(X1,X2,$sum(X2,3)) = X0 & ! [X4 : $int] : $less(X4,read(X1,X4))) => (? [X3 : $int] : ~$less(X3,read(sK0,X3)) & sK0 = write(sK1,sK2,$sum(sK2,3)) & ! [X4 : $int] : $less(X4,read(sK1,X4)))),
% 3.78/1.10 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f23,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ? [X3 : $int] : ~$less(X3,read(sK0,X3)) => ~$less(sK3,read(sK0,sK3))),
% 3.78/1.10 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f24,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ~$less(sK3,read(sK0,sK3)) & sK0 = write(sK1,sK2,$sum(sK2,3)) & ! [X4 : $int] : $less(X4,read(sK1,X4))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f21,f23,f22])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f25,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : array,X1 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2) )),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f26,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ( ! [X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X0 : array,X1 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) | X1 = X2) )),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f27,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ( ! [X4 : $int] : ($less(X4,read(sK1,X4))) )),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f28,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 sK0 = write(sK1,sK2,$sum(sK2,3))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 tff(f29,plain,(
% 3.78/1.10 ~$less(sK3,read(sK0,sK3))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_61,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 (read(write(X0_13,X0_3,X1_3),X0_3) = X1_3),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_62,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 (read(write(X0_13,X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = read(X0_13,X2_3)|X0_3 = X2_3),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
% 3.78/1.10 (~$less_int(sK3,read(sK0,sK3))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
% 3.78/1.10 (write(sK1,sK2,$sum_int(sK2,3)) = sK0),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
% 3.78/1.10 ($less_int(X0_3,read(sK1,X0_3))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_665,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 ($sum_int(sK2,3) = read(sK0,sK2)),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_61])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_1190,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 (read(sK0,X0_3) = read(sK1,X0_3)|X0_3 = sK2),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_62])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_1290,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 (X0_3 = sK2|$less_int(X0_3,read(sK0,X0_3))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1190,c_65])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_1362,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 (sK2 = sK3),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1290,c_63])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_1367,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 (~$less_int(sK2,read(sK0,sK2))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_1362])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_1368,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 (~$less_int(sK2,$sum_int(sK2,3))),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1367,c_665])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 cnf(c_1386,plain,
% 3.78/1.10 ($false),
% 3.78/1.10 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1368])).
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.10
% 3.78/1.10
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------