TSTP Solution File: DAT007_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : DAT007_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:14:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 3.94s 1.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : DAT007_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Thu May 2 18:58:24 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.41 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.16/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.94/1.09 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/1.09 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 ------ iProver source info
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.94/1.09 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.94/1.09 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Parsing...
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Proving...
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 clauses 25
% 3.94/1.09 conjectures 2
% 3.94/1.09 EPR 13
% 3.94/1.09 Horn 22
% 3.94/1.09 unary 19
% 3.94/1.09 binary 4
% 3.94/1.09 lits 33
% 3.94/1.09 lits eq 11
% 3.94/1.09 fd_pure 0
% 3.94/1.09 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.94/1.09 fd_cond 0
% 3.94/1.09 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 3.94/1.09 AC symbols 1
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 ------
% 3.94/1.09 Current options:
% 3.94/1.09 ------
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 ------ Proving...
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f1,axiom,(
% 3.94/1.09 ! [X0 : array,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2),
% 3.94/1.09 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1)).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f2,axiom,(
% 3.94/1.09 ! [X3 : array,X4 : $int,X5 : $int,X6 : $int] : (read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) | X4 = X5)),
% 3.94/1.09 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2)).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f3,conjecture,(
% 3.94/1.09 ! [X0 : array,X1 : array] : (write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 => ? [X2 : $int] : ($less(30,read(X0,X2)) & $less(read(X0,X2),40)))),
% 3.94/1.09 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1)).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 3.94/1.09 ~! [X0 : array,X1 : array] : (write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 => ? [X2 : $int] : ($less(30,read(X0,X2)) & $less(read(X0,X2),40)))),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f17,plain,(
% 3.94/1.09 ! [X0 : array,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (read(X0,X2) = read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) | X1 = X2)),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f18,plain,(
% 3.94/1.09 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array] : (! [X2 : $int] : (~$less(30,read(X0,X2)) | ~$less(read(X0,X2),40)) & write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0)),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f19,plain,(
% 3.94/1.09 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array] : (! [X2 : $int] : (~$less(30,read(X0,X2)) | ~$less(read(X0,X2),40)) & write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0) => (! [X2 : $int] : (~$less(30,read(sK0,X2)) | ~$less(read(sK0,X2),40)) & sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44))),
% 3.94/1.09 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f20,plain,(
% 3.94/1.09 ! [X2 : $int] : (~$less(30,read(sK0,X2)) | ~$less(read(sK0,X2),40)) & sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44)),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f18,f19])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f21,plain,(
% 3.94/1.09 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : array,X1 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2) )),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f22,plain,(
% 3.94/1.09 ( ! [X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X0 : array,X1 : $int] : (read(X0,X2) = read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) | X1 = X2) )),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f23,plain,(
% 3.94/1.09 sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44)),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 tff(f24,plain,(
% 3.94/1.09 ( ! [X2 : $int] : (~$less(30,read(sK0,X2)) | ~$less(read(sK0,X2),40)) )),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_61,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (read(write(X0_13,X0_3,X1_3),X0_3) = X1_3),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_62,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (read(write(X0_13,X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = read(X0_13,X2_3)|X0_3 = X2_3),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
% 3.94/1.09 (~$less_int(read(sK0,X0_3),40)|~$less_int(30,read(sK0,X0_3))),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
% 3.94/1.09 (write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = sK0),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_70,plain,($less_int(30,33)),theory(arith)).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_71,plain,($less_int(33,40)),theory(arith)).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_1386,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (read(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),X0_3) = read(sK0,X0_3)|
% 3.94/1.09 X0_3 = 4),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_62])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_1517,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (read(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),X0_3) = read(sK0,X0_3)|X0_3 = 4|
% 3.94/1.09 X0_3 = 5),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1386,c_62])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_1593,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (read(write(sK1,3,33),X0_3) = read(sK0,X0_3)|X0_3 = 4|X0_3 = 5),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1517,c_62])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_1606,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (read(sK0,3) = 33|3 = 4|3 = 5),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1593,c_61])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_1643,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (read(sK0,3) = 33),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1606])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_1647,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (~$less_int(read(sK0,3),40)|~$less_int(30,33)),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1643,c_63])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_1650,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 (~$less_int(30,33)|~$less_int(33,40)),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1647,c_1643])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 cnf(c_1651,plain,
% 3.94/1.09 ($false),
% 3.94/1.09 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,
% 3.94/1.09 [status(thm)],
% 3.94/1.09 [c_1650,c_71,c_70])).
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/1.09
% 3.94/1.09
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------