TSTP Solution File: DAT007_1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : DAT007_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:36:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.06s 1.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 5 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 22 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 7 ~; 14 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 79 ( 8 atm; 0 fun; 56 num; 15 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 2 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 4 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 (; 20 !; 1 ?; 21 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ write > read > #nlpp > #skF_1 > #skF_2
%Foreground sorts:
tff(array,type,
array: $tType ).
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(write,type,
write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': array ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': array ).
tff(read,type,
read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(f_63,axiom,
! [X: array,Ya: $int,Za: $int,X1a: $int] :
( ( Ya = Za )
| ( read(write(X,Ya,X1a),Za) = read(X,Za) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT001_0.ax',ax2) ).
tff(f_73,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [U: array,V: array] :
( ( U = write(write(write(write(V,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) )
=> ? [Wa: $int] :
( $less(read(U,Wa),40)
& $less(30,read(U,Wa)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
tff(f_59,axiom,
! [U: array,Va: $int,Wa: $int] : ( read(write(U,Va,Wa),Va) = Wa ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT001_0.ax',ax1) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
! [X_4: array,Y_5a: $int,X1_7a: $int,Z_6a: $int] :
( ( read(write(X_4,Y_5a,X1_7a),Z_6a) = read(X_4,Z_6a) )
| ( Z_6a = Y_5a ) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
write(write(write(write('#skF_2',3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = '#skF_1',
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_73]) ).
tff(c_70,plain,
! [Z_18a: $int] :
( ( read(write(write(write('#skF_2',3,33),4,444),5,55),Z_18a) = read('#skF_1',Z_18a) )
| ( Z_18a = 4 ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_10]) ).
tff(c_115,plain,
! [Z_19a: $int] :
( ( read(write(write('#skF_2',3,33),4,444),Z_19a) = read('#skF_1',Z_19a) )
| ( Z_19a = 4 )
| ( Z_19a = 5 ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_70]) ).
tff(c_149,plain,
! [Z_20a: $int] :
( ( read(write('#skF_2',3,33),Z_20a) = read('#skF_1',Z_20a) )
| ( Z_20a = 4 )
| ( Z_20a = 4 )
| ( Z_20a = 5 ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_115,c_10]) ).
tff(c_11,plain,
! [U_1: array,V_2a: $int,W_3a: $int] : ( read(write(U_1,V_2a,W_3a),V_2a) = W_3a ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).
tff(c_159,plain,
( ( read('#skF_1',3) = 33 )
| ( 4 = 3 )
| ( 4 = 3 )
| ( 5 = 3 ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_149,c_11]) ).
tff(c_175,plain,
read('#skF_1',3) = 33,
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_159]) ).
tff(c_9,plain,
! [W_9a: $int] :
( ~ $less(30,read('#skF_1',W_9a))
| ~ $less(read('#skF_1',W_9a),40) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_73]) ).
tff(c_184,plain,
( ~ $less(30,read('#skF_1',3))
| ~ $less(33,40) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_175,c_9]) ).
tff(c_188,plain,
( ~ $less(30,33)
| ~ $less(33,40) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_175,c_184]) ).
tff(c_191,plain,
$false,
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_188]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : DAT007_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 12:59:54 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 3.06/1.78 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.06/1.78
% 3.06/1.78 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.06/1.81
% 3.06/1.81 Inference rules
% 3.06/1.81 ----------------------
% 3.06/1.81 #Ref : 0
% 3.06/1.81 #Sup : 37
% 3.06/1.81 #Fact : 0
% 3.06/1.81 #Define : 0
% 3.06/1.81 #Split : 0
% 3.06/1.81 #Chain : 0
% 3.06/1.81 #Close : 0
% 3.06/1.81
% 3.06/1.81 Ordering : LPO
% 3.06/1.81
% 3.06/1.81 Simplification rules
% 3.06/1.81 ----------------------
% 3.06/1.81 #Subsume : 1
% 3.06/1.81 #Demod : 6
% 3.06/1.81 #Tautology : 24
% 3.06/1.81 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 3.06/1.81 #BackRed : 0
% 3.06/1.81
% 3.06/1.81 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.06/1.81 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.06/1.81
% 3.06/1.81 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.06/1.81 ----------------------
% 3.06/1.81 Preprocessing : 0.51
% 3.06/1.81 Parsing : 0.27
% 3.06/1.81 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 3.06/1.81 Main loop : 0.22
% 3.06/1.81 Inferencing : 0.10
% 3.06/1.81 Reduction : 0.05
% 3.06/1.81 Demodulation : 0.04
% 3.06/1.81 BG Simplification : 0.04
% 3.06/1.81 Subsumption : 0.04
% 3.06/1.81 Abstraction : 0.01
% 3.06/1.81 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.06/1.81 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.06/1.81 Total : 0.77
% 3.06/1.81 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.06/1.81 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.06/1.81 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.06/1.81 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------