TSTP Solution File: DAT004_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : DAT004_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:14:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.04s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.04s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : DAT004_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 2 18:41:01 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.04/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.04/1.14 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.04/1.14 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.04/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Parsing...
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 8 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 clauses 5
% 2.04/1.14 conjectures 3
% 2.04/1.14 EPR 0
% 2.04/1.14 Horn 4
% 2.04/1.14 unary 4
% 2.04/1.14 binary 1
% 2.04/1.14 lits 6
% 2.04/1.14 lits eq 6
% 2.04/1.14 fd_pure 0
% 2.04/1.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.04/1.14 fd_cond 0
% 2.04/1.14 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 2.04/1.14 AC symbols 0
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 ------
% 2.04/1.14 Current options:
% 2.04/1.14 ------
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f1,axiom,(
% 2.04/1.14 ! [X0 : array,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2),
% 2.04/1.14 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1)).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f2,axiom,(
% 2.04/1.14 ! [X3 : array,X4 : $int,X5 : $int,X6 : $int] : (read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) | X4 = X5)),
% 2.04/1.14 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2)).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f3,conjecture,(
% 2.04/1.14 ! [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : (write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 => (66 = read(X0,4) | 44 = read(X0,4)))),
% 2.04/1.14 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1)).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.04/1.14 ~! [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : (write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 => (66 = read(X0,4) | 44 = read(X0,4)))),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f5,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 ! [X0 : array,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) | X1 = X2)),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f6,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : ((66 != read(X0,4) & 44 != read(X0,4)) & write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0)),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f7,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : (66 != read(X0,4) & 44 != read(X0,4) & write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0)),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f8,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int] : (66 != read(X0,4) & 44 != read(X0,4) & write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0) => (66 != read(sK0,4) & 44 != read(sK0,4) & sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66))),
% 2.04/1.14 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f9,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 66 != read(sK0,4) & 44 != read(sK0,4) & sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66)),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f8])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f10,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : array,X1 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2) )),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f11,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 ( ! [X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X0 : array,X1 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) | X1 = X2) )),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f12,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66)),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f13,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 44 != read(sK0,4)),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 tff(f14,plain,(
% 2.04/1.14 66 != read(sK0,4)),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_49,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(write(X0_13,X0_3,X1_3),X0_3) = X1_3),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_50,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(write(X0_13,X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = read(X0_13,X2_3)|X0_3 = X2_3),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(sK0,4) != 66),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(sK0,4) != 44),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
% 2.04/1.14 (write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66) = sK0),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_168,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(sK0,sK2) = 66),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_49])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_172,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X0_3) = read(sK0,X0_3)|
% 2.04/1.14 X0_3 = sK2),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_50])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_184,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),X0_3) = read(sK0,X0_3)|X0_3 = sK2|
% 2.04/1.14 X0_3 = 5),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_50])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_203,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(sK0,4) = 44|sK2 = 4|4 = 5),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_184,c_49])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_205,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (sK2 = 4|4 = 5),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_52])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_212,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (sK2 = 4),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_205])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_216,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 (read(sK0,4) = 66),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_168,c_212])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 cnf(c_218,plain,
% 2.04/1.14 ($false),
% 2.04/1.14 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_51])).
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.04/1.14
% 2.04/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------