TSTP Solution File: DAT004_1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : DAT004_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:50:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 9 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 45 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 13 ~; 11 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 131 ( 0 atm; 0 fun; 111 num; 20 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 2 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 5 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 26 !; 9 ?; 35 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
array: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).
tff(func_def_9,type,
sK0: array ).
tff(func_def_10,type,
sK1: array ).
tff(func_def_11,type,
sK2: $int ).
tff(f43,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f41,f12]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
66 != read(sK0,4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f9,plain,
( ( 66 != read(sK0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(sK0,4) )
& ( sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
( ? [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( 66 != read(X0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(X0,4) )
& ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 ) )
=> ( ( 66 != read(sK0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(sK0,4) )
& ( sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f7,plain,
? [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( 66 != read(X0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(X0,4) )
& ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,plain,
? [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( 66 != read(X0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(X0,4) )
& ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 )
=> ( ( 66 = read(X0,4) )
| ( 44 = read(X0,4) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,conjecture,
! [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 )
=> ( ( 66 = read(X0,4) )
| ( 44 = read(X0,4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
tff(f41,plain,
66 = read(sK0,4),
inference(superposition,[],[f15,f38]) ).
tff(f38,plain,
4 = sK2,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
44 != read(sK0,4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f37,plain,
( ( 44 = read(sK0,4) )
| ( 4 = sK2 ) ),
inference(evaluation,[],[f32]) ).
tff(f32,plain,
( ( 44 = read(sK0,4) )
| ( 4 = sK2 )
| ( 4 = 5 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f20,f13]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
! [X2: $int,X0: array,X1: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,axiom,
! [X0: array,X1: $int,X2: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).
tff(f20,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(sK0,X0) = read(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),X0) )
| ( sK2 = X0 )
| ( 5 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f16,f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int,X0: array,X1: $int] :
( ( read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) )
| ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tff(f5,plain,
! [X0: array,X1: $int,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
( ( read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) )
| ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,axiom,
! [X3: array,X4: $int,X5: $int,X6: $int] :
( ( read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) )
| ( X4 = X5 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).
tff(f16,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X0) = read(sK0,X0) )
| ( sK2 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f14,f10]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
66 = read(sK0,sK2),
inference(superposition,[],[f13,f10]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : DAT004_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.15/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 23:15:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.36 % (19117)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19122)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)Memory used [KB]: 739
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)Memory used [KB]: 739
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (19119)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (19118)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (19123)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19122)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-19117"
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)Memory used [KB]: 769
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (19120)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (19117)Success in time 0.03 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------