TSTP Solution File: DAT004_1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : DAT004_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:49:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.79s 0.97s
% Output : Refutation 0.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 9 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 45 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 13 ~; 11 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 131 ( 0 atm; 0 fun; 111 num; 20 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 2 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 5 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 26 !; 9 ?; 35 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
array: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).
tff(func_def_9,type,
sK0: array ).
tff(func_def_10,type,
sK1: array ).
tff(func_def_11,type,
sK2: $int ).
tff(f40,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f38,f12]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
66 != read(sK0,4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f9,plain,
( ( 66 != read(sK0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(sK0,4) )
& ( sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
( ? [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( 66 != read(X0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(X0,4) )
& ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 ) )
=> ( ( 66 != read(sK0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(sK0,4) )
& ( sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f7,plain,
? [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( 66 != read(X0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(X0,4) )
& ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,plain,
? [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( 66 != read(X0,4) )
& ( 44 != read(X0,4) )
& ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 )
=> ( ( 66 = read(X0,4) )
| ( 44 = read(X0,4) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,conjecture,
! [X0: array,X1: array,X2: $int] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X2,66) = X0 )
=> ( ( 66 = read(X0,4) )
| ( 44 = read(X0,4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
tff(f38,plain,
66 = read(sK0,4),
inference(superposition,[],[f15,f37]) ).
tff(f37,plain,
4 = sK2,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f36,f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
44 != read(sK0,4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f36,plain,
( ( 44 = read(sK0,4) )
| ( 4 = sK2 ) ),
inference(evaluation,[],[f32]) ).
tff(f32,plain,
( ( 44 = read(sK0,4) )
| ( 4 = sK2 )
| ( 4 = 5 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f17,f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
! [X2: $int,X0: array,X1: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,axiom,
! [X0: array,X1: $int,X2: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).
tff(f17,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(sK0,X0) = read(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),X0) )
| ( sK2 = X0 )
| ( 5 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f16,f13]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int,X0: array,X1: $int] :
( ( read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) )
| ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tff(f5,plain,
! [X0: array,X1: $int,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
( ( read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) )
| ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,axiom,
! [X3: array,X4: $int,X5: $int,X6: $int] :
( ( read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) )
| ( X4 = X5 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).
tff(f16,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),X0) = read(sK0,X0) )
| ( sK2 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f13,f10]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,44),5,55),sK2,66),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
66 = read(sK0,sK2),
inference(superposition,[],[f14,f10]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : DAT004_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 23:15:37 EDT 2024
% 0.20/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.35 This is a TF0_THM_EQU_ARI problem
% 0.20/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/33Mi)
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/34Mi)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/34Mi)
% 0.79/0.96 % (4999)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/51Mi)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5004)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/83Mi)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5003)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/45Mi)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/56Mi)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5000)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/78Mi)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (5005)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (5002)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.79/0.96
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)Memory used [KB]: 983
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.79/0.96
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)Memory used [KB]: 969
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (4998)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.79/0.96
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)Memory used [KB]: 984
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5002)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5005)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (5001)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.79/0.96
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)Memory used [KB]: 986
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (4998)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5001)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.96 % (5003)First to succeed.
% 0.79/0.96 % (4999)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.79/0.96 % (5000)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.79/0.96 % (5004)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.79/0.97 % (5003)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-4997"
% 0.79/0.97 % (5003)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.79/0.97 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.79/0.97 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.79/0.97 % (5003)------------------------------
% 0.79/0.97 % (5003)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.79/0.97 % (5003)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.79/0.97
% 0.79/0.97 % (5003)Memory used [KB]: 999
% 0.79/0.97 % (5003)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.79/0.97 % (5003)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.79/0.97 % (4997)Success in time 0.607 s
% 0.79/0.97 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------