TSTP Solution File: DAT003_1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : DAT003_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:03:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   8 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  44 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (   7   ~;  14   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  134 (   0 atm;   0 fun; 110 num;  24 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   2   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (   4 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (  38   !;   4   ?;  42   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    array: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    sK0: array ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    sK1: array ).

tff(f37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f36,f14]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    33 != read(sK1,3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( ( 33 != read(sK1,3) )
    & ( sK1 = write(write(write(write(sK0,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f8,f9]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: array,X1: array] :
        ( ( 33 != read(X1,3) )
        & ( write(write(write(write(X0,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X1 ) )
   => ( ( 33 != read(sK1,3) )
      & ( sK1 = write(write(write(write(sK0,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: array,X1: array] :
      ( ( 33 != read(X1,3) )
      & ( write(write(write(write(X0,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: array,X0: array] :
        ( ( write(write(write(write(X0,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X1 )
       => ( 33 = read(X1,3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: array,X0: array] :
        ( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 )
       => ( 33 = read(X0,3) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,conjecture,
    ! [X1: array,X0: array] :
      ( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 )
     => ( 33 = read(X0,3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(f36,plain,
    33 = read(sK1,3),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f33]) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    ( ( 33 = read(sK1,3) )
    | ( 3 = 5 )
    | ( 3 = 4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f15,f29]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X1: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(sK0,3,33),X1) = read(sK1,X1) )
      | ( 4 = X1 )
      | ( 5 = X1 ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f26]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ! [X1: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(sK0,3,33),X1) = read(sK1,X1) )
      | ( 5 = X1 )
      | ( 4 = X1 )
      | ( 4 = X1 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f20,f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X3: $int,X0: $int,X1: array] :
      ( ( read(X1,X3) = read(write(X1,X2,X0),X3) )
      | ( X2 = X3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: array,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
      ( ( X2 = X3 )
      | ( read(X1,X3) = read(write(X1,X2,X0),X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ! [X3: $int,X2: array,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ( read(X2,X1) = read(write(X2,X0,X3),X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,axiom,
    ! [X4: $int,X5: $int,X3: array,X6: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) )
      | ( X4 = X5 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X1: $int] :
      ( ( read(sK1,X1) = read(write(write(sK0,3,33),4,444),X1) )
      | ( 4 = X1 )
      | ( 5 = X1 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f17,f16]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ( read(sK1,X0) = read(write(write(write(sK0,3,33),4,444),5,55),X0) )
      | ( 4 = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f16,f13]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    sK1 = write(write(write(write(sK0,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: array] : ( read(write(X1,X2,X0),X2) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: array,X2: $int] : ( read(write(X1,X2,X0),X2) = X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X2: array,X1: $int] : ( read(write(X2,X1,X0),X1) = X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2: $int,X1: $int,X0: array] : ( read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : DAT003=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 20:24:14 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.47  % (8618)dis+1010_1:4_aac=none:abs=on:atotf=0.5:avsq=on:avsqc=2:avsqr=215,247:awrs=converge:awrsf=128:bsd=on:erd=off:fde=none:gve=cautious:newcnf=on:nwc=5.0:rnwc=on:sac=on:sas=z3:sp=const_min:tgt=ground:thsq=on:thsqc=64:thsqr=1,4:i=59848:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59848Mi)
% 0.21/0.48  % (8637)lrs+10_1:1_sd=10:sos=all:ss=axioms:st=5.0:tha=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.49  % (8629)dis+32_1:1_bd=off:nm=4:sos=on:ss=included:i=4:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.21/0.49  % (8630)lrs+10_1:1_ep=R:gve=force:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:uwa=one_side_interpreted:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.50  % (8621)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (8637)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)Time elapsed: 0.107 s
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (8629)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (8616)Success in time 0.149 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------