TSTP Solution File: CSR256+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : CSR256+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 05:04:08 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 11.35s 2.15s
% Output : Refutation 11.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 25 ( 15 ~; 8 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f38488,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f38434,f20374]) ).
fof(f20374,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__ChangeOfPossession),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1759]) ).
fof(f1759,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__ChangeOfPossession),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mergeA2523) ).
fof(f38434,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Giving,c__ChangeOfPossession),
inference(resolution,[],[f38419,f20092]) ).
fof(f20092,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__Giving),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1762]) ).
fof(f1762,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__Giving),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mergeA2526) ).
fof(f38419,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X0,c__ChangeOfPossession)
| ~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f38359,f28293]) ).
fof(f28293,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( p__d__subclass(X0,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14184]) ).
fof(f14184,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( p__d__subclass(X0,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X0,X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f14183]) ).
fof(f14183,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( p__d__subclass(X0,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
& p__d__subclass(X0,X1) )
=> p__d__subclass(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(f38359,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__ChangeOfPossession),
inference(resolution,[],[f38356,f19965]) ).
fof(f19965,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ChangeOfPossession,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1758]) ).
fof(f1758,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ChangeOfPossession,c__SocialInteraction),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mergeA2519) ).
fof(f38356,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X0,c__SocialInteraction)
| ~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f28293,f17522]) ).
fof(f17522,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7435]) ).
fof(f7435,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(flattening,[],[f7434]) ).
fof(f7434,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f7433]) ).
fof(f7433,conjecture,
p__d__subclass(c__Funding,c__SocialInteraction),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclassEvent0321) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR256+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 20:16:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % (8162)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.38/0.56 % (8267)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.38/0.56 % (8266)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.38/0.56 % (8268)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.38/0.56 % (8269)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.38/0.56 % (8267)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.38/0.56 % (8265)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.38/0.56 % (8270)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.38/0.56 % (8271)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.40/1.00 TRYING [1]
% 0.40/1.07 TRYING [2]
% 8.29/1.70 TRYING [3]
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)First to succeed.
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-8162"
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 11.35/2.15 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 11.35/2.15 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)------------------------------
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)Termination reason: Refutation
% 11.35/2.15
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)Memory used [KB]: 25547
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)Time elapsed: 1.591 s
% 11.35/2.15 % (8270)Instructions burned: 5757 (million)
% 11.35/2.15 % (8162)Success in time 1.775 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------