TSTP Solution File: CSR254+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : CSR255+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n188.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.5MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 12:29:23 EST 2019
% Result : Theorem 83.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 83.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 52 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 114 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 117 ( 55 ~; 44 |; 13 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 69 ( 2 sgn 37 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(417,axiom,
! [X53,X186,X187] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X53,X186)
& p__d__subclass(X186,X187) )
=> p__d__subclass(X53,X187) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(561,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA178) ).
fof(642,axiom,
! [X164] :
( p__d__subclass(X164,c__Entity)
=> ? [X246] : p__d__instance(X246,X164) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA176) ).
fof(1398,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Product,c__Artifact),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA3136) ).
fof(1400,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Artifact,c__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA3134) ).
fof(1765,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Object,c__Physical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA181) ).
fof(2178,axiom,
! [X12,X13] :
( p__result(X12,X13)
=> p__d__instance(X12,c__Process) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',typeA437) ).
fof(2669,axiom,
! [X604] :
( p__d__instance(X604,c__Product)
=> ? [X605] :
( p__d__instance(X605,c__Manufacture)
& p__result(X605,X604) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA3137) ).
fof(3069,axiom,
! [X53,X186,X187] :
( ( p__d__instance(X53,X186)
& p__d__subclass(X186,X187) )
=> p__d__instance(X53,X187) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',predefinitionsA12) ).
fof(3407,conjecture,
? [X53,X186] :
( p__d__instance(X53,c__Process)
& p__d__instance(X53,c__Manufacture)
& p__d__instance(X186,c__Object)
& p__result(X53,X186) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',resultRelation0646) ).
fof(3408,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X53,X186] :
( p__d__instance(X53,c__Process)
& p__d__instance(X53,c__Manufacture)
& p__d__instance(X186,c__Object)
& p__result(X53,X186) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[3407]) ).
fof(4602,plain,
! [X53,X186,X187] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X53,X186)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X186,X187)
| p__d__subclass(X53,X187) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[417]) ).
fof(4603,plain,
! [X188,X189,X190] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X188,X189)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X189,X190)
| p__d__subclass(X188,X190) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4602]) ).
cnf(4604,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[4603]) ).
cnf(5036,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[561]) ).
fof(5223,plain,
! [X164] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X164,c__Entity)
| ? [X246] : p__d__instance(X246,X164) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[642]) ).
fof(5224,plain,
! [X247] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X247,c__Entity)
| ? [X248] : p__d__instance(X248,X247) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5223]) ).
fof(5225,plain,
! [X247] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X247,c__Entity)
| p__d__instance(esk109_1(X247),X247) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[5224]) ).
cnf(5226,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk109_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5225]) ).
cnf(7310,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Product,c__Artifact),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1398]) ).
cnf(7312,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Artifact,c__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1400]) ).
cnf(8410,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Object,c__Physical),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1765]) ).
fof(9545,plain,
! [X12,X13] :
( ~ p__result(X12,X13)
| p__d__instance(X12,c__Process) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2178]) ).
fof(9546,plain,
! [X14,X15] :
( ~ p__result(X14,X15)
| p__d__instance(X14,c__Process) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[9545]) ).
cnf(9547,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Process)
| ~ p__result(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[9546]) ).
fof(10927,plain,
! [X604] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X604,c__Product)
| ? [X605] :
( p__d__instance(X605,c__Manufacture)
& p__result(X605,X604) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2669]) ).
fof(10928,plain,
! [X606] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X606,c__Product)
| ? [X607] :
( p__d__instance(X607,c__Manufacture)
& p__result(X607,X606) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10927]) ).
fof(10929,plain,
! [X606] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X606,c__Product)
| ( p__d__instance(esk546_1(X606),c__Manufacture)
& p__result(esk546_1(X606),X606) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[10928]) ).
fof(10930,plain,
! [X606] :
( ( p__d__instance(esk546_1(X606),c__Manufacture)
| ~ p__d__instance(X606,c__Product) )
& ( p__result(esk546_1(X606),X606)
| ~ p__d__instance(X606,c__Product) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[10929]) ).
cnf(10931,plain,
( p__result(esk546_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Product) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10930]) ).
cnf(10932,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk546_1(X1),c__Manufacture)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Product) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10930]) ).
fof(12110,plain,
! [X53,X186,X187] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X53,X186)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X186,X187)
| p__d__instance(X53,X187) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3069]) ).
fof(12111,plain,
! [X188,X189,X190] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X188,X189)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X189,X190)
| p__d__instance(X188,X190) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[12110]) ).
cnf(12112,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12111]) ).
fof(13160,negated_conjecture,
! [X53,X186] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X53,c__Process)
| ~ p__d__instance(X53,c__Manufacture)
| ~ p__d__instance(X186,c__Object)
| ~ p__result(X53,X186) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3408]) ).
fof(13161,negated_conjecture,
! [X187,X188] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X187,c__Process)
| ~ p__d__instance(X187,c__Manufacture)
| ~ p__d__instance(X188,c__Object)
| ~ p__result(X187,X188) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13160]) ).
cnf(13162,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__result(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X2,c__Object)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Manufacture)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Process) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[13161]) ).
cnf(15658,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__result(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Manufacture)
| ~ p__d__instance(X2,c__Object) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[13162,9547]) ).
cnf(15686,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Object)
| ~ p__d__instance(esk546_1(X1),c__Manufacture)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Product) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[15658,10931,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(18644,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4604,8410,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(18648,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Object)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Artifact) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4604,7312,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(18740,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4604,5036,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(33490,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Product)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Object) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[15686,10932]) ).
cnf(101895,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Product,c__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[18648,7310,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(102109,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Object)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Product) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[12112,101895,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(104072,plain,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Product),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[102109,33490]) ).
cnf(104073,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Product,c__Entity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[104072,5226,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(124064,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Product,c__Physical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[104073,18740,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132603,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Product,c__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[124064,18644,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132604,plain,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[132603,101895,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132605,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[132604,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132606,plain,
$false,
132605,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR255+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.25 % Computer : n188.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.25 % Memory : 32218.5MB
% 0.03/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.25 % DateTime : Wed Feb 20 06:37:58 CST 2019
% 0.03/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.30 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.30 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 0.60/0.91 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.60/0.91 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.60/0.91 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.60/0.91 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_2 with time limit 89
% 0.60/0.91 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=89', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_2']
% 0.60/0.91 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.60/0.91 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 1.00/1.21 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_3 with time limit 119
% 1.00/1.21 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=119', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_3']
% 1.00/1.21 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 1.00/1.21 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 1.71/1.98 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_4 with time limit 149
% 1.71/1.98 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=149', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_4']
% 1.71/1.98 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 1.71/1.98 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 83.49/83.73 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5 with time limit 298
% 83.49/83.73 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=298', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpR5ptPS/sel_theBenchmark.p_5']
% 83.49/83.73 -prover status Theorem
% 83.49/83.73 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 4.
% 83.49/83.73 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 83.49/83.73 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 83.49/83.73 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 83.49/83.73 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 83.49/83.73 # SZS status Theorem
% 83.49/83.73 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 83.55/83.76 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------