TSTP Solution File: CSR232+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : CSR233+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n186.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.5MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 12:29:22 EST 2019
% Result : Theorem 110.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 110.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 40 ( 21 ~; 15 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn 11 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(34,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__HandGesture),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3',miloA1803) ).
fof(36,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Impacting),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3',miloA1805) ).
fof(45,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3',mergeA2697) ).
fof(85,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3',mergeA2701) ).
fof(87,axiom,
! [X43,X44,X45] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X43,X44)
& p__d__subclass(X44,X45) )
=> p__d__subclass(X43,X45) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(110,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__Communication),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3',mergeA2713) ).
fof(117,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__Gesture),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3',miloA1799) ).
fof(151,conjecture,
? [X43] :
( p__d__subclass(X43,c__Impacting)
& p__d__subclass(X43,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3',commonSubclassEvent1126) ).
fof(152,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X43] :
( p__d__subclass(X43,c__Impacting)
& p__d__subclass(X43,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[151]) ).
cnf(243,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__HandGesture),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34]) ).
cnf(250,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Impacting),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[36]) ).
cnf(276,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[45]) ).
cnf(378,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[85]) ).
fof(389,plain,
! [X43,X44,X45] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X43,X44)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X44,X45)
| p__d__subclass(X43,X45) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[87]) ).
fof(390,plain,
! [X46,X47,X48] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X46,X47)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X47,X48)
| p__d__subclass(X46,X48) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[389]) ).
cnf(391,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[390]) ).
cnf(443,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__Communication),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[110]) ).
cnf(457,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__Gesture),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[117]) ).
fof(548,negated_conjecture,
! [X43] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X43,c__Impacting)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X43,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[152]) ).
fof(549,negated_conjecture,
! [X44] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X44,c__Impacting)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X44,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[548]) ).
cnf(550,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[549]) ).
cnf(634,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__SocialInteraction) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[391,276,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(668,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Gesture)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__HandGesture) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[391,457,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(700,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Gesture) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[391,443,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(950,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[634,378,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(960,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[391,950,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(987,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[550,960,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(994,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Communication),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[987,250,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1456,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__HandGesture) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[700,668,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1909,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Communication),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1456,243,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1911,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1909,994,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1912,plain,
$false,
1911,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR233+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.25 % Computer : n186.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.25 % Memory : 32218.5MB
% 0.03/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.25 % DateTime : Wed Feb 20 03:17:14 CST 2019
% 0.03/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.30 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.30 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 29.40/29.71 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 110.53/110.81 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 110.53/110.84 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 110.53/110.84 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 110.53/110.84 -prover status ResourceOut
% 110.53/110.84 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_2 with time limit 81
% 110.53/110.84 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=81', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_2']
% 110.53/110.84 -prover status ResourceOut
% 110.53/110.84 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 110.70/111.09 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3 with time limit 75
% 110.70/111.09 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=75', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp_4Lczj/sel_theBenchmark.p_3']
% 110.70/111.09 -prover status Theorem
% 110.70/111.09 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 2.
% 110.70/111.09 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 110.70/111.09 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 110.70/111.09 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 110.70/111.09 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 110.70/111.09 # SZS status Theorem
% 110.70/111.09 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 110.88/111.11 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------