TSTP Solution File: CSR232+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:03:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.84s 5.02s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 14 ~; 10 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn 7 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
& p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
=> p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(mergeA2697,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2697) ).
fof(mergeA2701,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2701) ).
fof(mergeA2713,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__Communication),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2713) ).
fof(commonSubclassEvent1126,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting)
& p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commonSubclassEvent1126) ).
fof(miloA1799,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__Gesture),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1799) ).
fof(miloA1805,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Impacting),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1805) ).
fof(miloA1803,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__HandGesture),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA1803) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X4,X5)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X5,X6)
| p__d__subclass(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2697]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__SocialInteraction) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2701]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__Communication),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2713]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Gesture,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting)
& p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[commonSubclassEvent1126]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Gesture) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__Gesture),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1799]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X2,c__Impacting)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X2,c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__HandGesture,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Impacting) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__Impacting),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1805]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__HandGesture) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__HandGesture),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA1803]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Clapping,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 15:46:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.84/5.02 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.84/5.02 # Preprocessing time : 0.417 s
% 0.84/5.02
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof found!
% 0.84/5.02 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.84/5.02 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object total steps : 28
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object clause steps : 17
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object generating inferences : 9
% 0.84/5.02 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.84/5.02 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.84/5.02 # Parsed axioms : 7433
% 0.84/5.02 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Initial clauses : 10860
% 0.84/5.02 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 0.84/5.02 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10840
% 0.84/5.02 # Processed clauses : 12449
% 0.84/5.02 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.84/5.02 # ...subsumed : 29
% 0.84/5.02 # ...remaining for further processing : 12411
% 0.84/5.02 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 37
% 0.84/5.02 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Generated clauses : 66064
% 0.84/5.02 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 64362
% 0.84/5.02 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3244
% 0.84/5.02 # Paramodulations : 65972
% 0.84/5.02 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Equation resolutions : 89
% 0.84/5.02 # Current number of processed clauses : 12403
% 0.84/5.02 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5108
% 0.84/5.02 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Negative unit clauses : 79
% 0.84/5.02 # Non-unit-clauses : 7216
% 0.84/5.02 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 62753
% 0.84/5.02 # ...number of literals in the above : 239824
% 0.84/5.02 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16968271
% 0.84/5.02 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8887731
% 0.84/5.02 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3269
% 0.84/5.02 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 538850
% 0.84/5.02 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # BW rewrite match attempts : 48
% 0.84/5.02 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.84/5.02 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1334035
% 0.84/5.02
% 0.84/5.02 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.84/5.02 # User time : 3.283 s
% 0.84/5.02 # System time : 0.078 s
% 0.84/5.02 # Total time : 3.361 s
% 0.84/5.02 # Maximum resident set size: 144816 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------