TSTP Solution File: CSR231+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : CSR232+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n183.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.5MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 12:29:21 EST 2019
% Result : Theorem 121.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 121.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 22 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 20 ~; 14 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 8 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 11 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(419,axiom,
! [X52,X180,X181] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X52,X180)
& p__d__subclass(X180,X181) )
=> p__d__subclass(X52,X181) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(1839,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Painting),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',miloA542) ).
fof(1840,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__ContentDevelopment),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',miloA541) ).
fof(2491,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Translocation,c__Motion),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2505) ).
fof(2562,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Transfer,c__Translocation),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2472) ).
fof(3316,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Putting,c__Transfer),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2481) ).
fof(3318,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Covering,c__Putting),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2483) ).
fof(3400,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Covering),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',miloA528) ).
fof(3403,conjecture,
? [X52] :
( p__d__subclass(X52,c__ContentDevelopment)
& p__d__subclass(X52,c__Motion) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',commonSubclassEvent0382) ).
fof(3404,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X52] :
( p__d__subclass(X52,c__ContentDevelopment)
& p__d__subclass(X52,c__Motion) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[3403]) ).
fof(4589,plain,
! [X52,X180,X181] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X52,X180)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X180,X181)
| p__d__subclass(X52,X181) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[419]) ).
fof(4590,plain,
! [X182,X183,X184] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X182,X183)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X183,X184)
| p__d__subclass(X182,X184) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4589]) ).
cnf(4591,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[4590]) ).
cnf(8578,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Painting),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1839]) ).
cnf(8579,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__ContentDevelopment),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1840]) ).
cnf(10389,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Translocation,c__Motion),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2491]) ).
cnf(10602,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Transfer,c__Translocation),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2562]) ).
cnf(12898,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Putting,c__Transfer),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3316]) ).
cnf(12900,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Covering,c__Putting),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3318]) ).
cnf(13139,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Covering),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3400]) ).
fof(13147,negated_conjecture,
! [X52] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X52,c__ContentDevelopment)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X52,c__Motion) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3404]) ).
fof(13148,negated_conjecture,
! [X53] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X53,c__ContentDevelopment)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X53,c__Motion) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13147]) ).
cnf(13149,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentDevelopment) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[13148]) ).
cnf(13154,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Motion),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[13149,8579,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(14274,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Translocation) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4591,10389,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(15045,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Transfer)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Putting) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4591,12898,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(15047,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Translocation)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Transfer) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4591,10602,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(15162,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Putting)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Covering) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4591,12900,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(33827,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Translocation),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[13154,14274,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(45974,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Putting),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[15162,13139,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(46004,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Transfer),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[15045,45974,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(46006,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Transfer)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Painting) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4591,46004,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132607,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Transfer),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[46006,8578,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132616,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Translocation),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[15047,132607,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132618,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[132616,33827,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132619,plain,
$false,
132618,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR232+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.04/0.25 % Computer : n183.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.04/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.04/0.25 % Memory : 32218.5MB
% 0.04/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.04/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.25 % DateTime : Wed Feb 20 03:15:14 CST 2019
% 0.04/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.30 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.30 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 0.58/0.90 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.58/0.90 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.58/0.90 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.58/0.90 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_2 with time limit 89
% 0.58/0.90 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=89', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_2']
% 0.58/0.90 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.58/0.90 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 0.83/1.14 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_3 with time limit 119
% 0.83/1.14 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=119', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_3']
% 0.83/1.14 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.83/1.14 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 1.76/2.00 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_4 with time limit 149
% 1.76/2.00 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=149', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_4']
% 1.76/2.00 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 1.76/2.00 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 121.21/121.52 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5 with time limit 298
% 121.21/121.52 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=298', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpYB379x/sel_theBenchmark.p_5']
% 121.21/121.52 -prover status Theorem
% 121.21/121.52 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 4.
% 121.21/121.52 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 121.21/121.52 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 121.21/121.52 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 121.21/121.52 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 121.21/121.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 121.21/121.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 121.21/121.55 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------