TSTP Solution File: CSR231+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR231+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:03:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.88s 6.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  19   ~;  15   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn   7   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
        & p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
     => p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).

fof(mergeA2505,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Translocation,c__Motion),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2505) ).

fof(mergeA2472,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Transfer,c__Translocation),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2472) ).

fof(mergeA2481,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Putting,c__Transfer),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2481) ).

fof(mergeA2483,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Covering,c__Putting),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2483) ).

fof(commonSubclassEvent0382,conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentDevelopment)
      & p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commonSubclassEvent0382) ).

fof(miloA528,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Covering),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA528) ).

fof(miloA541,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__ContentDevelopment),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA541) ).

fof(miloA542,axiom,
    p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Painting),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA542) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ p__d__subclass(X4,X5)
      | ~ p__d__subclass(X5,X6)
      | p__d__subclass(X4,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Translocation,c__Motion),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2505]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Translocation) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X2,c__Translocation)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Transfer,c__Translocation),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2472]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Transfer) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X2,c__Transfer)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Putting,c__Transfer),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2481]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Putting) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Covering,c__Putting),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2483]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Covering,c__Motion),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
        ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentDevelopment)
        & p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[commonSubclassEvent0382]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Covering) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Covering),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA528]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ p__d__subclass(X2,c__ContentDevelopment)
      | ~ p__d__subclass(X2,c__Motion) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Motion),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentDevelopment) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__ContentDevelopment),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA541]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Painting) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Painting),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA542]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Motion),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR231+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 16:12:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.88/6.07  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.88/6.07  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.88/6.07  # Preprocessing time       : 0.090 s
% 0.88/6.07  
% 0.88/6.07  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.88/6.07  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.88/6.07  # Parsed axioms                        : 7433
% 0.88/6.07  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7374
% 0.88/6.07  # Initial clauses                      : 79
% 0.88/6.07  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 79
% 0.88/6.07  # Processed clauses                    : 5496
% 0.88/6.07  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # ...subsumed                          : 4100
% 0.88/6.07  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1396
% 0.88/6.07  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.88/6.07  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Generated clauses                    : 5435
% 0.88/6.07  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 5417
% 0.88/6.07  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2701
% 0.88/6.07  # Paramodulations                      : 5434
% 0.88/6.07  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.88/6.07  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1395
% 0.88/6.07  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 72
% 0.88/6.07  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.88/6.07  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.88/6.07  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1319
% 0.88/6.07  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.88/6.07  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 418066
% 0.88/6.07  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 415256
% 0.88/6.07  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6801
% 0.88/6.07  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 444
% 0.88/6.07  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.88/6.07  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 128289
% 0.88/6.07  
% 0.88/6.07  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.88/6.07  # User time                : 0.242 s
% 0.88/6.07  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.88/6.07  # Total time               : 0.256 s
% 0.88/6.07  # Maximum resident set size: 23228 pages
% 0.88/6.07  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.88/6.07  # Preprocessing time       : 0.434 s
% 0.88/6.07  
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof found!
% 0.88/6.07  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.88/6.07  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object total steps             : 32
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object clause steps            : 20
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object formula steps           : 12
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object generating inferences   : 11
% 0.88/6.07  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.88/6.07  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.88/6.07  # Parsed axioms                        : 7433
% 0.88/6.07  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Initial clauses                      : 10860
% 0.88/6.07  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 20
% 0.88/6.07  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 10840
% 0.88/6.07  # Processed clauses                    : 13422
% 0.88/6.07  # ...of these trivial                  : 303
% 0.88/6.07  # ...subsumed                          : 163
% 0.88/6.07  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12956
% 0.88/6.07  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 40
% 0.88/6.07  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.88/6.07  # Generated clauses                    : 49638
% 0.88/6.07  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 46900
% 0.88/6.07  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3266
% 0.88/6.07  # Paramodulations                      : 49539
% 0.88/6.07  # Factorizations                       : 1
% 0.88/6.07  # Equation resolutions                 : 98
% 0.88/6.07  # Current number of processed clauses  : 12946
% 0.88/6.07  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5668
% 0.88/6.07  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.88/6.07  #    Negative unit clauses             : 63
% 0.88/6.07  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7215
% 0.88/6.07  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44318
% 0.88/6.07  # ...number of literals in the above   : 161458
% 0.88/6.07  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.88/6.07  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17104847
% 0.88/6.07  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9112495
% 0.88/6.07  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3428
% 0.88/6.07  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3483028
% 0.88/6.07  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 78
% 0.88/6.07  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.88/6.07  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.88/6.07  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1084684
% 0.88/6.07  
% 0.88/6.07  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.88/6.07  # User time                : 4.268 s
% 0.88/6.07  # System time              : 0.086 s
% 0.88/6.07  # Total time               : 4.354 s
% 0.88/6.07  # Maximum resident set size: 124724 pages
% 0.88/24.05  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.88/24.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.88/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.88/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------