TSTP Solution File: CSR231+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR231+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:20:48 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.94s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 20 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 29 ( 14 ~; 11 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 8 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 7 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
& p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
=> p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(mergeA2505,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Translocation,c__Motion),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2505) ).
fof(mergeA2472,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Transfer,c__Translocation),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2472) ).
fof(mergeA2481,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Putting,c__Transfer),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2481) ).
fof(mergeA2483,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Covering,c__Putting),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2483) ).
fof(miloA528,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Covering),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA528) ).
fof(commonSubclassEvent0382,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentDevelopment)
& p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commonSubclassEvent0382) ).
fof(miloA542,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Painting),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA542) ).
fof(miloA541,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__ContentDevelopment),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA541) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1045,X1046,X1047] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1045,X1046)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1046,X1047)
| p__d__subclass(X1045,X1047) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Translocation,c__Motion),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2505]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Translocation) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Transfer,c__Translocation),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2472]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Transfer,c__Motion),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Transfer) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Putting,c__Transfer),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2481]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Putting,c__Motion),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Putting) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Covering,c__Putting),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2483]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Covering,c__Motion),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Covering) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Covering),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA528]) ).
fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentDevelopment)
& p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[commonSubclassEvent0382]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Painting,c__Motion),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
! [X7881] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X7881,c__ContentDevelopment)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X7881,c__Motion) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Painting) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Painting),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA542]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentDevelopment)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Motion) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__Motion),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ArtPainting,c__ContentDevelopment),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA541]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : CSR231+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:07:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.94/1.42 # Version: 3.1.0
% 2.94/1.42 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.94/1.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 22090 completed with status 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 2.94/1.42 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.94/1.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.94/1.42 # Search class: FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.94/1.42 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 113s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_012_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with pid 22133 completed with status 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Result found by G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 2.94/1.42 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.94/1.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.94/1.42 # Search class: FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.94/1.42 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 113s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 2.94/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.105 s
% 2.94/1.42
% 2.94/1.42 # Proof found!
% 2.94/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 2.94/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.94/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 7433
% 2.94/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Initial clauses : 10860
% 2.94/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 2.94/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10840
% 2.94/1.42 # Processed clauses : 1281
% 2.94/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 1281
% 2.94/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Generated clauses : 2541
% 2.94/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2435
% 2.94/1.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Paramodulations : 2541
% 2.94/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # NegExts : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Total rewrite steps : 105
% 2.94/1.42 # ...of those cached : 11
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.94/1.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.94/1.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.94/1.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.94/1.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.94/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 1281
% 2.94/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1101
% 2.94/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 81
% 2.94/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 99
% 2.94/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11991
% 2.94/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 28056
% 2.94/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3770
% 2.94/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3769
% 2.94/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29997
% 2.94/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.94/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 524546
% 2.94/1.42 # Search garbage collected termcells : 89336
% 2.94/1.42
% 2.94/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.94/1.42 # User time : 0.646 s
% 2.94/1.42 # System time : 0.068 s
% 2.94/1.42 # Total time : 0.714 s
% 2.94/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 31004 pages
% 2.94/1.42
% 2.94/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.94/1.42 # User time : 1.361 s
% 2.94/1.42 # System time : 0.219 s
% 2.94/1.42 # Total time : 1.581 s
% 2.94/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 9660 pages
% 2.94/1.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------