TSTP Solution File: CSR220+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR220+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 68.50s 11.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 68.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 22
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 71 ( 36 unt; 0 nHn; 71 RR)
% Number of literals : 112 ( 2 equ; 52 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 15 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3434,plain,
( p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__disjointDecomposition3(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_3434) ).
cnf(i_0_3393,plain,
( p__d__disjointDecomposition3(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p__d__partition3(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_3393) ).
cnf(i_0_910,plain,
p__d__partition3(c__GeographicArea,c__WaterArea,c__LandArea),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_910) ).
cnf(i_0_3376,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_3376) ).
cnf(i_0_955,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__City,c__LandArea),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_955) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( p__d__instance(esk1_1(X1),c__City)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__GeographicArea) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( esk1_1(X1) = X1
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__GeographicArea) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_3379,plain,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_3379) ).
cnf(i_0_925,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__WaterArea,c__GeographicArea),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_925) ).
cnf(i_0_2435,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk489_1(X1),c__WaterArea)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterTransportation) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_2435) ).
cnf(i_0_120,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk14_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_120) ).
cnf(i_0_3436,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_3436) ).
cnf(i_0_123,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_123) ).
cnf(i_0_1213,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Process,c__Physical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_1213) ).
cnf(i_0_1191,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Vehicle,c__TransportationDevice),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_1191) ).
cnf(i_0_1189,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__TransportationDevice,c__Device),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_1189) ).
cnf(i_0_3195,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__WaterVehicle,c__Vehicle),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_3195) ).
cnf(i_0_4014,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Process)
| ~ p__capability(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_4014) ).
cnf(i_0_2437,plain,
( p__capability(c__WaterTransportation,c__instrument,X1)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterVehicle) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_2437) ).
cnf(i_0_1185,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Device,c__Artifact),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_1185) ).
cnf(i_0_1148,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Artifact,c__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_1148) ).
cnf(i_0_145,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Object,c__Physical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_8fw3de6/input.p',i_0_145) ).
cnf(c_0_4037,plain,
( p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__disjointDecomposition3(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_3434 ).
cnf(c_0_4038,plain,
( p__d__disjointDecomposition3(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p__d__partition3(X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_3393 ).
cnf(c_0_4039,plain,
( p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__partition3(X3,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4037,c_0_4038]) ).
cnf(c_0_4040,plain,
p__d__partition3(c__GeographicArea,c__WaterArea,c__LandArea),
i_0_910 ).
cnf(c_0_4041,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2) ),
i_0_3376 ).
cnf(c_0_4042,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__City,c__LandArea),
i_0_955 ).
cnf(c_0_4043,negated_conjecture,
( p__d__instance(esk1_1(X1),c__City)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__GeographicArea) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4044,negated_conjecture,
( esk1_1(X1) = X1
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__GeographicArea) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_4045,plain,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
i_0_3379 ).
cnf(c_0_4046,plain,
p__d__disjoint(c__WaterArea,c__LandArea),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4039,c_0_4040]) ).
cnf(c_0_4047,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__LandArea)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__City) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4041,c_0_4042]) ).
cnf(c_0_4048,negated_conjecture,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__City)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__GeographicArea) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4043,c_0_4044]) ).
cnf(c_0_4049,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__WaterArea,c__GeographicArea),
i_0_925 ).
cnf(c_0_4050,plain,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterArea)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__LandArea) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4045,c_0_4046]) ).
cnf(c_0_4051,negated_conjecture,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__LandArea)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__GeographicArea) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4047,c_0_4048]) ).
cnf(c_0_4052,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__GeographicArea)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterArea) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4041,c_0_4049]) ).
cnf(c_0_4053,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterArea),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4050,c_0_4051]),c_0_4052]) ).
cnf(c_0_4054,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk489_1(X1),c__WaterArea)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterTransportation) ),
i_0_2435 ).
cnf(c_0_4055,plain,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterTransportation),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4053,c_0_4054]) ).
cnf(c_0_4056,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk14_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
i_0_120 ).
cnf(c_0_4057,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
i_0_3436 ).
cnf(c_0_4058,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
i_0_123 ).
cnf(c_0_4059,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__WaterTransportation,c__Entity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4055,c_0_4056]) ).
cnf(c_0_4060,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4057,c_0_4058]) ).
cnf(c_0_4061,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Process,c__Physical),
i_0_1213 ).
cnf(c_0_4062,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Vehicle,c__TransportationDevice),
i_0_1191 ).
cnf(c_0_4063,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__WaterTransportation,c__Physical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4059,c_0_4060]) ).
cnf(c_0_4064,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Process) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4057,c_0_4061]) ).
cnf(c_0_4065,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__TransportationDevice,c__Device),
i_0_1189 ).
cnf(c_0_4066,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__TransportationDevice)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Vehicle) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4057,c_0_4062]) ).
cnf(c_0_4067,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__WaterVehicle,c__Vehicle),
i_0_3195 ).
cnf(c_0_4068,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Process)
| ~ p__capability(X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_4014 ).
cnf(c_0_4069,plain,
( p__capability(c__WaterTransportation,c__instrument,X1)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterVehicle) ),
i_0_2437 ).
cnf(c_0_4070,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__WaterTransportation,c__Process),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4063,c_0_4064]) ).
cnf(c_0_4071,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Device,c__Artifact),
i_0_1185 ).
cnf(c_0_4072,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Device)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__TransportationDevice) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4057,c_0_4065]) ).
cnf(c_0_4073,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__WaterVehicle,c__TransportationDevice),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4066,c_0_4067]) ).
cnf(c_0_4074,plain,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__WaterVehicle),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4068,c_0_4069]),c_0_4070]) ).
cnf(c_0_4075,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Artifact,c__Object),
i_0_1148 ).
cnf(c_0_4076,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Artifact)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Device) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4057,c_0_4071]) ).
cnf(c_0_4077,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__WaterVehicle,c__Device),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4072,c_0_4073]) ).
cnf(c_0_4078,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__WaterVehicle,c__Entity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4074,c_0_4056]) ).
cnf(c_0_4079,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Object,c__Physical),
i_0_145 ).
cnf(c_0_4080,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Object)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Artifact) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4057,c_0_4075]) ).
cnf(c_0_4081,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__WaterVehicle,c__Artifact),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4076,c_0_4077]) ).
cnf(c_0_4082,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__WaterVehicle,c__Physical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4078,c_0_4060]) ).
cnf(c_0_4083,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4057,c_0_4079]) ).
cnf(c_0_4084,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__WaterVehicle,c__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4080,c_0_4081]) ).
cnf(c_0_4085,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4082,c_0_4083]),c_0_4084])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR220+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 09:16:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.44/0.63 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.44/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.44/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 68.50/11.78 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 68.50/11.78 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 68.50/11.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.152 s
% 68.50/11.78
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof found!
% 68.50/11.78 # SZS status Theorem
% 68.50/11.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object total steps : 71
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object clause steps : 49
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object formula steps : 22
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object initial clauses used : 22
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object initial formulas used : 22
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object generating inferences : 27
% 68.50/11.78 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 68.50/11.78 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 68.50/11.78 # Parsed axioms : 4239
% 68.50/11.78 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 68.50/11.78 # Initial clauses : 4239
% 68.50/11.78 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 68.50/11.78 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4239
% 68.50/11.78 # Processed clauses : 14214
% 68.50/11.78 # ...of these trivial : 169
% 68.50/11.78 # ...subsumed : 1736
% 68.50/11.78 # ...remaining for further processing : 12309
% 68.50/11.78 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 68.50/11.78 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 68.50/11.78 # Backward-subsumed : 97
% 68.50/11.78 # Backward-rewritten : 39
% 68.50/11.78 # Generated clauses : 38601
% 68.50/11.78 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 37301
% 68.50/11.78 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2748
% 68.50/11.78 # Paramodulations : 38408
% 68.50/11.78 # Factorizations : 46
% 68.50/11.78 # Equation resolutions : 147
% 68.50/11.78 # Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 68.50/11.78 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 68.50/11.78 # Current number of processed clauses : 12170
% 68.50/11.78 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2363
% 68.50/11.78 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 68.50/11.78 # Negative unit clauses : 1968
% 68.50/11.78 # Non-unit-clauses : 7839
% 68.50/11.78 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27153
% 68.50/11.78 # ...number of literals in the above : 103347
% 68.50/11.78 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 68.50/11.78 # Current number of archived clauses : 136
% 68.50/11.78 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16061441
% 68.50/11.78 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5274290
% 68.50/11.78 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3988
% 68.50/11.78 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2912583
% 68.50/11.78 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 68.50/11.78 # BW rewrite match attempts : 25
% 68.50/11.78 # BW rewrite match successes : 24
% 68.50/11.78 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 68.50/11.78 # Condensation successes : 0
% 68.50/11.78 # Termbank termtop insertions : 823052
% 68.50/11.78
% 68.50/11.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 68.50/11.78 # User time : 7.084 s
% 68.50/11.78 # System time : 0.090 s
% 68.50/11.78 # Total time : 7.173 s
% 68.50/11.78 # ...preprocessing : 0.152 s
% 68.50/11.78 # ...main loop : 7.021 s
% 68.50/11.78 # Maximum resident set size: 86312 pages
% 68.50/11.78
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------