TSTP Solution File: CSR218+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR218+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 28.77s 6.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 28.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   52 (   2 equ;  24 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3382,plain,
    ( p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__disjointDecomposition3(X3,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_3382) ).

cnf(i_0_3311,plain,
    ( p__d__disjointDecomposition3(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ p__d__partition3(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_3311) ).

cnf(i_0_207,plain,
    p__d__partition3(c__Entity,c__Physical,c__Abstract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_207) ).

cnf(i_0_3297,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ p__d__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_3297) ).

cnf(i_0_3294,plain,
    ( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_3294) ).

cnf(i_0_1196,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Quantity,c__Abstract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_1196) ).

cnf(i_0_238,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Object,c__Physical),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_238) ).

cnf(i_0_1295,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Number,c__Quantity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_1295) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    p__d__instance(esk1_0,c__Number),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk1_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    p__d__instance(esk2_0,c__Object),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x1nuqqmi/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(c_0_3394,plain,
    ( p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__disjointDecomposition3(X3,X1,X2) ),
    i_0_3382 ).

cnf(c_0_3395,plain,
    ( p__d__disjointDecomposition3(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ p__d__partition3(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_3311 ).

cnf(c_0_3396,plain,
    ( p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__partition3(X3,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3394,c_0_3395]) ).

cnf(c_0_3397,plain,
    p__d__partition3(c__Entity,c__Physical,c__Abstract),
    i_0_207 ).

cnf(c_0_3398,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ p__d__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_3297 ).

cnf(c_0_3399,plain,
    p__d__disjoint(c__Physical,c__Abstract),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3396,c_0_3397]) ).

cnf(c_0_3400,plain,
    ( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_3294 ).

cnf(c_0_3401,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Quantity,c__Abstract),
    i_0_1196 ).

cnf(c_0_3402,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Physical)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Abstract) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3398,c_0_3399]) ).

cnf(c_0_3403,plain,
    ( p__d__instance(X1,c__Abstract)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Quantity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3400,c_0_3401]) ).

cnf(c_0_3404,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Object,c__Physical),
    i_0_238 ).

cnf(c_0_3405,plain,
    p__d__subclass(c__Number,c__Quantity),
    i_0_1295 ).

cnf(c_0_3406,negated_conjecture,
    p__d__instance(esk1_0,c__Number),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_3407,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk1_0,
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_3408,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Physical)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Quantity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3402,c_0_3403]) ).

cnf(c_0_3409,plain,
    ( p__d__instance(X1,c__Physical)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Object) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3400,c_0_3404]) ).

cnf(c_0_3410,plain,
    ( p__d__instance(X1,c__Quantity)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Number) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3400,c_0_3405]) ).

cnf(c_0_3411,negated_conjecture,
    p__d__instance(esk2_0,c__Number),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3406,c_0_3407]) ).

cnf(c_0_3412,plain,
    ( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Quantity)
    | ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Object) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3408,c_0_3409]) ).

cnf(c_0_3413,negated_conjecture,
    p__d__instance(esk2_0,c__Quantity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3410,c_0_3411]) ).

cnf(c_0_3414,negated_conjecture,
    p__d__instance(esk2_0,c__Object),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_3415,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3412,c_0_3413]),c_0_3414])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : CSR218+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:47:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.36/0.60  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.36/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.36/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 28.77/6.42  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 28.77/6.42  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 28.77/6.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.145 s
% 28.77/6.42  
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof found!
% 28.77/6.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 28.77/6.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object total steps             : 33
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 22
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 9
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 6
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 11
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 10
% 28.77/6.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 28.77/6.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 28.77/6.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 4260
% 28.77/6.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 28.77/6.42  # Initial clauses                      : 4260
% 28.77/6.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 28.77/6.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4260
% 28.77/6.42  # Processed clauses                    : 6634
% 28.77/6.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 56
% 28.77/6.42  # ...subsumed                          : 96
% 28.77/6.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6482
% 28.77/6.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 11
% 28.77/6.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 28.77/6.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 28.77/6.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 28.77/6.42  # Generated clauses                    : 27234
% 28.77/6.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 26314
% 28.77/6.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1639
% 28.77/6.42  # Paramodulations                      : 27023
% 28.77/6.42  # Factorizations                       : 137
% 28.77/6.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 74
% 28.77/6.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 28.77/6.42  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 28.77/6.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6462
% 28.77/6.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1413
% 28.77/6.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 28.77/6.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 562
% 28.77/6.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4487
% 28.77/6.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23772
% 28.77/6.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 94302
% 28.77/6.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 28.77/6.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 28.77/6.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5931354
% 28.77/6.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2635509
% 28.77/6.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1738
% 28.77/6.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1094809
% 28.77/6.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 28.77/6.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 28.77/6.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 28.77/6.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 28.77/6.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 28.77/6.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 580261
% 28.77/6.42  
% 28.77/6.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 28.77/6.42  # User time                : 2.280 s
% 28.77/6.42  # System time              : 0.042 s
% 28.77/6.42  # Total time               : 2.322 s
% 28.77/6.42  # ...preprocessing         : 0.145 s
% 28.77/6.42  # ...main loop             : 2.177 s
% 28.77/6.42  # Maximum resident set size: 67100 pages
% 28.77/6.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------