TSTP Solution File: CSR185+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : CSR186+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n184.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.5MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 12:29:18 EST 2019
% Result : Theorem 277.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 277.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 18
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 91 ( 45 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 174 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 151 ( 68 ~; 63 |; 14 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 14 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 76 ( 0 sgn 46 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(155,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Stating,c__LinguisticCommunication),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2721) ).
fof(200,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__PsychologicalProcess,c__BiologicalProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2344) ).
fof(417,axiom,
! [X43,X180,X181] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X43,X180)
& p__d__subclass(X180,X181) )
=> p__d__subclass(X43,X181) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(560,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA178) ).
fof(639,axiom,
! [X161] :
( p__d__subclass(X161,c__Entity)
=> ? [X244] : p__d__instance(X244,X161) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA176) ).
fof(640,axiom,
! [X161] :
( p__d__instance(X161,c__Class)
<=> p__d__subclass(X161,c__Entity) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA177) ).
fof(713,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2697) ).
fof(795,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2701) ).
fof(993,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Imagining),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',miloA2629) ).
fof(995,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__InternalChange,c__Process),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2644) ).
fof(1122,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__BiologicalProcess,c__InternalChange),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2309) ).
fof(1744,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Process,c__Physical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA324) ).
fof(1829,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Imagining,c__PsychologicalProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',miloA2628) ).
fof(2641,axiom,
p__d__disjoint(c__Dreaming,c__IntentionalProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',miloA2630) ).
fof(3066,axiom,
! [X143,X142] :
( p__d__disjoint(X143,X142)
<=> ! [X246] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X246,X143)
| ~ p__d__instance(X246,X142) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',predefinitionsA15) ).
fof(3067,axiom,
! [X43,X180,X181] :
( ( p__d__instance(X43,X180)
& p__d__subclass(X180,X181) )
=> p__d__instance(X43,X181) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',predefinitionsA12) ).
fof(3343,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__LinguisticCommunication,c__Communication),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',mergeA2719) ).
fof(3406,conjecture,
~ equal(c__Stating,c__Imagining),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5',negatedEqualEvent0006) ).
fof(3407,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ equal(c__Stating,c__Imagining),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[3406]) ).
fof(3481,plain,
! [X143,X142] :
( p__d__disjoint(X143,X142)
<=> ! [X246] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X246,X143)
| ~ p__d__instance(X246,X142) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[3066,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(3497,negated_conjecture,
equal(c__Stating,c__Imagining),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[3407,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(3916,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Stating,c__LinguisticCommunication),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[155]) ).
cnf(4029,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__PsychologicalProcess,c__BiologicalProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[200]) ).
fof(4587,plain,
! [X43,X180,X181] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X43,X180)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X180,X181)
| p__d__subclass(X43,X181) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[417]) ).
fof(4588,plain,
! [X182,X183,X184] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X182,X183)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X183,X184)
| p__d__subclass(X182,X184) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4587]) ).
cnf(4589,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[4588]) ).
cnf(5007,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[560]) ).
fof(5182,plain,
! [X161] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X161,c__Entity)
| ? [X244] : p__d__instance(X244,X161) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[639]) ).
fof(5183,plain,
! [X245] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X245,c__Entity)
| ? [X246] : p__d__instance(X246,X245) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5182]) ).
fof(5184,plain,
! [X245] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X245,c__Entity)
| p__d__instance(esk108_1(X245),X245) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[5183]) ).
cnf(5185,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk108_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5184]) ).
fof(5186,plain,
! [X161] :
( ( ~ p__d__instance(X161,c__Class)
| p__d__subclass(X161,c__Entity) )
& ( ~ p__d__subclass(X161,c__Entity)
| p__d__instance(X161,c__Class) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[640]) ).
fof(5187,plain,
! [X162] :
( ( ~ p__d__instance(X162,c__Class)
| p__d__subclass(X162,c__Entity) )
& ( ~ p__d__subclass(X162,c__Entity)
| p__d__instance(X162,c__Class) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5186]) ).
cnf(5188,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Class)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5187]) ).
cnf(5189,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Class) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5187]) ).
cnf(5360,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__SocialInteraction,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[713]) ).
cnf(5566,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__SocialInteraction),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[795]) ).
cnf(6079,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Imagining),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[993]) ).
cnf(6086,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__InternalChange,c__Process),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[995]) ).
cnf(6480,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__BiologicalProcess,c__InternalChange),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1122]) ).
cnf(8301,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Process,c__Physical),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1744]) ).
cnf(8529,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Imagining,c__PsychologicalProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1829]) ).
cnf(10830,plain,
p__d__disjoint(c__Dreaming,c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2641]) ).
fof(12091,plain,
! [X143,X142] :
( ( ~ p__d__disjoint(X143,X142)
| ! [X246] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X246,X143)
| ~ p__d__instance(X246,X142) ) )
& ( ? [X246] :
( p__d__instance(X246,X143)
& p__d__instance(X246,X142) )
| p__d__disjoint(X143,X142) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3481]) ).
fof(12092,plain,
! [X247,X248] :
( ( ~ p__d__disjoint(X247,X248)
| ! [X249] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X249,X247)
| ~ p__d__instance(X249,X248) ) )
& ( ? [X250] :
( p__d__instance(X250,X247)
& p__d__instance(X250,X248) )
| p__d__disjoint(X247,X248) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[12091]) ).
fof(12093,plain,
! [X247,X248] :
( ( ~ p__d__disjoint(X247,X248)
| ! [X249] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X249,X247)
| ~ p__d__instance(X249,X248) ) )
& ( ( p__d__instance(esk634_2(X247,X248),X247)
& p__d__instance(esk634_2(X247,X248),X248) )
| p__d__disjoint(X247,X248) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[12092]) ).
fof(12094,plain,
! [X247,X248,X249] :
( ( ~ p__d__instance(X249,X247)
| ~ p__d__instance(X249,X248)
| ~ p__d__disjoint(X247,X248) )
& ( ( p__d__instance(esk634_2(X247,X248),X247)
& p__d__instance(esk634_2(X247,X248),X248) )
| p__d__disjoint(X247,X248) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[12093]) ).
fof(12095,plain,
! [X247,X248,X249] :
( ( ~ p__d__instance(X249,X247)
| ~ p__d__instance(X249,X248)
| ~ p__d__disjoint(X247,X248) )
& ( p__d__instance(esk634_2(X247,X248),X247)
| p__d__disjoint(X247,X248) )
& ( p__d__instance(esk634_2(X247,X248),X248)
| p__d__disjoint(X247,X248) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[12094]) ).
cnf(12098,plain,
( ~ p__d__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12095]) ).
fof(12099,plain,
! [X43,X180,X181] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X43,X180)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X180,X181)
| p__d__instance(X43,X181) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3067]) ).
fof(12100,plain,
! [X182,X183,X184] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X182,X183)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X183,X184)
| p__d__instance(X182,X184) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[12099]) ).
cnf(12101,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12100]) ).
cnf(12965,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__LinguisticCommunication,c__Communication),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3343]) ).
cnf(13154,negated_conjecture,
c__Stating = c__Imagining,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3497]) ).
cnf(13155,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Stating),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[6079,13154,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(13156,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Stating,c__PsychologicalProcess),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[8529,13154,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(13159,plain,
p__d__instance(c__Physical,c__Class),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[5188,5007,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(15849,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__SocialInteraction)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Communication) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[12101,5566,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(15900,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__SocialInteraction) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[12101,5360,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(15932,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Communication)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__LinguisticCommunication) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[12101,12965,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(16877,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__LinguisticCommunication)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Stating) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4589,3916,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(16920,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Process)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__InternalChange) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4589,6086,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(17118,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__BiologicalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__PsychologicalProcess) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4589,4029,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(17119,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__InternalChange)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__BiologicalProcess) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4589,6480,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(17987,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X2,c__Class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4589,5189,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(18026,plain,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Dreaming) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[12098,10830,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(32201,plain,
( ~ p__d__instance(esk108_1(c__Dreaming),c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Entity) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[18026,5185,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(42351,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__LinguisticCommunication),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[16877,13155,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(42360,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__LinguisticCommunication)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Dreaming) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[12101,42351,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(60313,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__IntentionalProcess)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Communication) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[15900,15849,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(97079,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Stating,c__BiologicalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17118,13156,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(97099,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Stating,c__InternalChange),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17119,97079,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(97110,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Stating,c__Process),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[16920,97099,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(97113,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Process)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Stating) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4589,97110,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(106729,plain,
( p__d__subclass(c__Process,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__instance(c__Physical,c__Class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17987,8301,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(109574,plain,
( p__d__subclass(c__Process,c__Entity)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[106729,13159,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(109575,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Process,c__Entity),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[109574,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(109670,plain,
p__d__instance(c__Process,c__Class),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[5188,109575,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(113210,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Process),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[97113,13155,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(113225,plain,
( p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__instance(c__Process,c__Class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17987,113210,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(113226,plain,
( p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Entity)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[113225,109670,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(113227,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Entity),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[113226,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(113267,plain,
( $false
| ~ p__d__instance(esk108_1(c__Dreaming),c__IntentionalProcess) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[32201,113227,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(113268,plain,
~ p__d__instance(esk108_1(c__Dreaming),c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[113267,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(117890,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk108_1(c__Dreaming),c__LinguisticCommunication)
| ~ p__d__subclass(c__Dreaming,c__Entity) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[42360,5185,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(117923,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk108_1(c__Dreaming),c__LinguisticCommunication)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[117890,113227,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(117924,plain,
p__d__instance(esk108_1(c__Dreaming),c__LinguisticCommunication),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[117923,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(117926,plain,
p__d__instance(esk108_1(c__Dreaming),c__Communication),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[15932,117924,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(134822,plain,
p__d__instance(esk108_1(c__Dreaming),c__IntentionalProcess),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60313,117926,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(134868,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[134822,113268,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(134869,plain,
$false,
134868,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR186+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.05 % Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.27 % Computer : n184.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.27 % Memory : 32218.5MB
% 0.03/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.28 % DateTime : Tue Feb 19 17:39:27 CST 2019
% 0.03/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.33 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.33 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 0.65/0.98 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.65/0.98 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.65/0.98 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.65/0.98 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_2 with time limit 89
% 0.65/0.98 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=89', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_2']
% 0.65/0.98 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.65/0.98 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 0.92/1.44 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_3 with time limit 119
% 0.92/1.44 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=119', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_3']
% 0.92/1.44 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.92/1.44 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 150.34/150.71 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 150.44/150.76 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_4 with time limit 149
% 150.44/150.76 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=149', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_4']
% 150.44/150.76 -prover status ResourceOut
% 150.44/150.76 --creating new selector for [CSR006+0.ax]
% 277.63/277.98 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5 with time limit 149
% 277.63/277.98 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=149', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpUS6YED/sel_theBenchmark.p_5']
% 277.63/277.98 -prover status Theorem
% 277.63/277.98 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 4.
% 277.63/277.98 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 277.63/277.98 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 277.63/277.98 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 277.63/277.98 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 277.63/277.98 # SZS status Theorem
% 277.63/277.98 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 277.63/278.03 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------