TSTP Solution File: CSR118+5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR118+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:16:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 30.97s 4.88s
% Output : CNFRefutation 30.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 22 ~; 19 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7277,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Hominid,s__Primate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7277) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7280,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Hominid),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7280) ).
fof(abe_mammal,conjecture,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abe_mammal) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7267,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Primate,s__Mammal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7267) ).
fof(abe_human,axiom,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abe_human) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1225,X1226,X1227] :
( ~ s__instance(X1226,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1225,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1225,X1226)
| ~ s__instance(X1227,X1225)
| s__instance(X1227,X1226) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1223,X1224] :
( ( s__instance(X1223,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1223,X1224) )
& ( s__instance(X1224,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1223,X1224) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
s__subclass(s__Hominid,s__Primate),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7277]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Hominid),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7280]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[abe_mammal])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
s__subclass(s__Primate,s__Mammal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7267]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Primate)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Hominid) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Hominid)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Mammal)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Primate) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Primate)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Mammal)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Human),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[abe_human]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : CSR118+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:20:37 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 30.97/4.88 # Version: 3.1.0
% 30.97/4.88 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 30.97/4.88 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 12466 completed with status 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 30.97/4.88 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 30.97/4.88 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 30.97/4.88 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 30.97/4.88 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 12480 completed with status 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 30.97/4.88 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 30.97/4.88 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 30.97/4.88 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 30.97/4.88 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 30.97/4.88 # Preprocessing time : 0.059 s
% 30.97/4.88 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 30.97/4.88
% 30.97/4.88 # Proof found!
% 30.97/4.88 # SZS status Theorem
% 30.97/4.88 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 30.97/4.88 # Parsed axioms : 16750
% 30.97/4.88 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 13569
% 30.97/4.88 # Initial clauses : 4407
% 30.97/4.88 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 58
% 30.97/4.88 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4349
% 30.97/4.88 # Processed clauses : 14304
% 30.97/4.88 # ...of these trivial : 726
% 30.97/4.88 # ...subsumed : 549
% 30.97/4.88 # ...remaining for further processing : 13029
% 30.97/4.88 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 30.97/4.88 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Backward-subsumed : 168
% 30.97/4.88 # Backward-rewritten : 1862
% 30.97/4.88 # Generated clauses : 26344
% 30.97/4.88 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23654
% 30.97/4.88 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 309
% 30.97/4.88 # Paramodulations : 26331
% 30.97/4.88 # Factorizations : 4
% 30.97/4.88 # NegExts : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 30.97/4.88 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Total rewrite steps : 5352
% 30.97/4.88 # ...of those cached : 2780
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional check models : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 30.97/4.88 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 30.97/4.88 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 30.97/4.88 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 30.97/4.88 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 30.97/4.88 # Current number of processed clauses : 6724
% 30.97/4.88 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2089
% 30.97/4.88 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 30.97/4.88 # Negative unit clauses : 184
% 30.97/4.88 # Non-unit-clauses : 4444
% 30.97/4.88 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14752
% 30.97/4.88 # ...number of literals in the above : 48448
% 30.97/4.88 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Current number of archived clauses : 6300
% 30.97/4.88 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6042333
% 30.97/4.88 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2304403
% 30.97/4.88 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 963
% 30.97/4.88 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1585490
% 30.97/4.88 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 155
% 30.97/4.88 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3265
% 30.97/4.88 # BW rewrite match successes : 1467
% 30.97/4.88 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Condensation successes : 0
% 30.97/4.88 # Termbank termtop insertions : 799649
% 30.97/4.88 # Search garbage collected termcells : 125875
% 30.97/4.88
% 30.97/4.88 # -------------------------------------------------
% 30.97/4.88 # User time : 3.846 s
% 30.97/4.88 # System time : 0.154 s
% 30.97/4.88 # Total time : 4.000 s
% 30.97/4.88 # Maximum resident set size: 48464 pages
% 30.97/4.88
% 30.97/4.88 # -------------------------------------------------
% 30.97/4.88 # User time : 18.316 s
% 30.97/4.88 # System time : 0.338 s
% 30.97/4.88 # Total time : 18.654 s
% 30.97/4.88 # Maximum resident set size: 18412 pages
% 30.97/4.88 % E---3.1 exiting
% 30.97/4.88 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------