TSTP Solution File: CSR118+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR118+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:03:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.05s 18.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 22 ~; 18 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(abe_mammal,conjecture,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',abe_mammal) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6073,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Primate,s__Mammal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_6073) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6083,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Hominid,s__Primate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_6083) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6086,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Hominid),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_6086) ).
fof(abe_human,axiom,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',abe_human) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11] :
( ~ s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X9,X10)
| ~ s__instance(X11,X9)
| s__instance(X11,X10) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X8,X9] :
( ( s__instance(X8,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) )
& ( s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[abe_mammal]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__subclass(s__Primate,s__Mammal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6073]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
s__subclass(s__Hominid,s__Primate),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6083]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Mammal)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Primate) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Primate)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Hominid) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Mammal)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Hominid) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Hominid),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6086]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Hominid),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Hominid)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Human),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[abe_human]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR118+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 18:57:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.05/18.24 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 1.05/18.24 # Preprocessing time : 0.389 s
% 1.05/18.24
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof found!
% 1.05/18.24 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.05/18.24 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object total steps : 26
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 1.05/18.24 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 1.05/18.24 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.05/18.24 # Parsed axioms : 7219
% 1.05/18.24 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.05/18.24 # Initial clauses : 8410
% 1.05/18.24 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 1.05/18.24 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8347
% 1.05/18.24 # Processed clauses : 27482
% 1.05/18.24 # ...of these trivial : 993
% 1.05/18.24 # ...subsumed : 8813
% 1.05/18.24 # ...remaining for further processing : 17676
% 1.05/18.24 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3634
% 1.05/18.24 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 662943
% 1.05/18.24 # Backward-subsumed : 1135
% 1.05/18.24 # Backward-rewritten : 3281
% 1.05/18.24 # Generated clauses : 1548079
% 1.05/18.24 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1539319
% 1.05/18.24 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2615
% 1.05/18.24 # Paramodulations : 1543530
% 1.05/18.24 # Factorizations : 34
% 1.05/18.24 # Equation resolutions : 3750
% 1.05/18.24 # Current number of processed clauses : 12897
% 1.05/18.24 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4332
% 1.05/18.24 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.05/18.24 # Negative unit clauses : 16
% 1.05/18.24 # Non-unit-clauses : 8549
% 1.05/18.24 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96237
% 1.05/18.24 # ...number of literals in the above : 355409
% 1.05/18.24 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.05/18.24 # Current number of archived clauses : 4416
% 1.05/18.24 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22600779
% 1.05/18.24 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15692780
% 1.05/18.24 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12085
% 1.05/18.24 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2167163
% 1.05/18.24 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.05/18.24 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1462
% 1.05/18.24 # BW rewrite match successes : 1460
% 1.05/18.24 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.05/18.24 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.05/18.24 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11686514
% 1.05/18.24
% 1.05/18.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/18.24 # User time : 16.379 s
% 1.05/18.24 # System time : 0.182 s
% 1.05/18.24 # Total time : 16.561 s
% 1.05/18.24 # Maximum resident set size: 205716 pages
% 1.05/24.56 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.05/24.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/24.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/24.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/24.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/24.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/24.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/24.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/24.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/24.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/24.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/24.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/24.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/24.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/24.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/24.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/24.62 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------