TSTP Solution File: CSR116+47 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR116+47 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.32s 2.88s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 21
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 59 ( 26 unt; 0 nHn; 57 RR)
% Number of literals : 217 ( 0 equ; 175 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 21 ( 21 usr; 16 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 153 ( 48 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_890,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X6)
| ~ arg1(X7,X6)
| ~ arg2(X7,X3)
| ~ attr(X6,X8)
| ~ attr(X6,X9)
| ~ attr(X2,X10)
| ~ sub(X10,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,familiename_1_1)
| ~ subr(X7,rprs_0)
| ~ val(X10,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ val(X8,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X9,mandela_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_890) ).
cnf(i_0_363,hypothesis,
val(c966,s__374dafrika_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_363) ).
cnf(i_0_364,hypothesis,
sub(c966,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_364) ).
cnf(i_0_389,hypothesis,
val(c24,mandela_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_389) ).
cnf(i_0_390,hypothesis,
sub(c24,familiename_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_390) ).
cnf(i_0_391,hypothesis,
val(c23,nelson_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_391) ).
cnf(i_0_392,hypothesis,
sub(c23,eigenname_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_392) ).
cnf(i_0_867,plain,
( subr(esk55_3(X1,X2,X3),rprs_0)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_867) ).
cnf(i_0_872,plain,
( arg2(esk55_3(X1,X2,X3),esk56_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_872) ).
cnf(i_0_873,plain,
( arg1(esk55_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_873) ).
cnf(i_0_868,plain,
( sub(esk56_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_868) ).
cnf(i_0_886,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_886) ).
cnf(i_0_887,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_887) ).
cnf(i_0_888,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_888) ).
cnf(i_0_366,hypothesis,
attr(c965,c966),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_366) ).
cnf(i_0_394,hypothesis,
attr(c22,c24),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_394) ).
cnf(i_0_395,hypothesis,
attr(c22,c23),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_395) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( obj(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_760,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_760) ).
cnf(i_0_393,hypothesis,
sub(c22,mensch_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_393) ).
cnf(i_0_362,hypothesis,
in(c968,c965),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4y9nryvv/lgb.p',i_0_362) ).
cnf(c_0_912,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X6)
| ~ arg1(X7,X6)
| ~ arg2(X7,X3)
| ~ attr(X6,X8)
| ~ attr(X6,X9)
| ~ attr(X2,X10)
| ~ sub(X10,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,familiename_1_1)
| ~ subr(X7,rprs_0)
| ~ val(X10,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ val(X8,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X9,mandela_0) ),
i_0_890 ).
cnf(c_0_913,hypothesis,
val(c966,s__374dafrika_0),
i_0_363 ).
cnf(c_0_914,hypothesis,
sub(c966,name_1_1),
i_0_364 ).
cnf(c_0_915,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,mandela_0)
| ~ val(X2,nelson_0)
| ~ subr(X3,rprs_0)
| ~ attr(X4,c966)
| ~ attr(X5,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ arg2(X3,X6)
| ~ arg1(X3,X5)
| ~ obj(X7,X5)
| ~ sub(X1,familiename_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,X8)
| ~ in(X9,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_912,c_0_913]),c_0_914])]) ).
cnf(c_0_916,hypothesis,
val(c24,mandela_0),
i_0_389 ).
cnf(c_0_917,hypothesis,
sub(c24,familiename_1_1),
i_0_390 ).
cnf(c_0_918,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,nelson_0)
| ~ subr(X2,rprs_0)
| ~ attr(X3,c966)
| ~ attr(X4,c24)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ arg2(X2,X5)
| ~ arg1(X2,X4)
| ~ obj(X6,X4)
| ~ sub(X1,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,X7)
| ~ in(X8,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_915,c_0_916]),c_0_917])]) ).
cnf(c_0_919,hypothesis,
val(c23,nelson_0),
i_0_391 ).
cnf(c_0_920,hypothesis,
sub(c23,eigenname_1_1),
i_0_392 ).
cnf(c_0_921,hypothesis,
( ~ subr(X1,rprs_0)
| ~ attr(X2,c966)
| ~ attr(X3,c24)
| ~ attr(X3,c23)
| ~ arg2(X1,X4)
| ~ arg1(X1,X3)
| ~ obj(X5,X3)
| ~ sub(X4,X6)
| ~ in(X7,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_918,c_0_919]),c_0_920])]) ).
cnf(c_0_922,plain,
( subr(esk55_3(X1,X2,X3),rprs_0)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_867 ).
cnf(c_0_923,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ attr(X2,c966)
| ~ attr(X3,c24)
| ~ attr(X3,c23)
| ~ arg2(esk55_3(X1,X4,X5),X6)
| ~ arg2(X1,X5)
| ~ arg1(esk55_3(X1,X4,X5),X3)
| ~ arg1(X1,X4)
| ~ obj(X7,X3)
| ~ sub(X6,X8)
| ~ in(X9,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_921,c_0_922]) ).
cnf(c_0_924,plain,
( arg2(esk55_3(X1,X2,X3),esk56_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_872 ).
cnf(c_0_925,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ attr(X2,c966)
| ~ attr(X3,c24)
| ~ attr(X3,c23)
| ~ arg2(X1,X4)
| ~ arg1(esk55_3(X1,X5,X4),X3)
| ~ arg1(X1,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X3)
| ~ sub(esk56_3(X1,X5,X4),X7)
| ~ in(X8,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_923,c_0_924]) ).
cnf(c_0_926,plain,
( arg1(esk55_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_873 ).
cnf(c_0_927,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ attr(X2,c966)
| ~ attr(X3,c24)
| ~ attr(X3,c23)
| ~ arg2(X1,X4)
| ~ arg1(X1,X3)
| ~ obj(X5,X3)
| ~ sub(esk56_3(X1,X3,X4),X6)
| ~ in(X7,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_925,c_0_926]) ).
cnf(c_0_928,plain,
( sub(esk56_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_868 ).
cnf(c_0_929,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ attr(X2,c966)
| ~ attr(X3,c24)
| ~ attr(X3,c23)
| ~ arg2(X1,X4)
| ~ arg1(X1,X3)
| ~ obj(X5,X3)
| ~ in(X6,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_927,c_0_928]) ).
cnf(c_0_930,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_886 ).
cnf(c_0_931,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c966)
| ~ attr(X2,c24)
| ~ attr(X2,c23)
| ~ arg2(esk59_2(X3,X4),X5)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X3,X4),X2)
| ~ obj(X6,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X7,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_929,c_0_930]) ).
cnf(c_0_932,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_887 ).
cnf(c_0_933,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c966)
| ~ attr(X2,c24)
| ~ attr(X2,c23)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X3,X4),X2)
| ~ obj(X5,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X6,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_931,c_0_932]) ).
cnf(c_0_934,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_888 ).
cnf(c_0_935,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c966)
| ~ attr(X2,c24)
| ~ attr(X2,c23)
| ~ obj(X3,X2)
| ~ sub(X2,X4)
| ~ in(X5,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_933,c_0_934]) ).
cnf(c_0_936,hypothesis,
attr(c965,c966),
i_0_366 ).
cnf(c_0_937,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c24)
| ~ attr(X1,c23)
| ~ obj(X2,X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X4,c965) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_935,c_0_936]) ).
cnf(c_0_938,hypothesis,
attr(c22,c24),
i_0_394 ).
cnf(c_0_939,hypothesis,
attr(c22,c23),
i_0_395 ).
cnf(c_0_940,plain,
( obj(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_941,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_760 ).
cnf(c_0_942,hypothesis,
( ~ obj(X1,c22)
| ~ sub(c22,X2)
| ~ in(X3,c965) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_937,c_0_938]),c_0_939])]) ).
cnf(c_0_943,plain,
( obj(esk6_3(X1,eigenname_1_1,X2),X2)
| ~ attr(X2,X1)
| ~ sub(X1,eigenname_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_940,c_0_941]) ).
cnf(c_0_944,plain,
( ~ attr(c22,X1)
| ~ sub(c22,X2)
| ~ sub(X1,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ in(X3,c965) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_942,c_0_943]) ).
cnf(c_0_945,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(c22,X1)
| ~ in(X2,c965) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_944,c_0_939]),c_0_920])]) ).
cnf(c_0_946,hypothesis,
sub(c22,mensch_1_1),
i_0_393 ).
cnf(c_0_947,hypothesis,
in(c968,c965),
i_0_362 ).
cnf(c_0_948,hypothesis,
~ in(X1,c965),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_945,c_0_946]) ).
cnf(c_0_949,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_947,c_0_948]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR116+47 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 06:54:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.58 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.40/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.40/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.32/2.88 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.32/2.88 # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.32/2.88 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.32/2.88 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.32/2.88 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 5.32/2.88 #
% 5.32/2.88 # Preprocessing time : 0.034 s
% 5.32/2.88 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.32/2.88
% 5.32/2.88 # Proof found!
% 5.32/2.88 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.32/2.88 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.74/2.88 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.74/2.88
% 6.74/2.88 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.74/2.88 # User time : 0.080 s
% 6.74/2.88 # System time : 0.010 s
% 6.74/2.88 # Total time : 0.090 s
% 6.74/2.88 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 6.74/2.88
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------