TSTP Solution File: CSR116+33 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR116+33 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.84s 2.92s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 46 ( 36 unt; 0 nHn; 46 RR)
% Number of literals : 139 ( 0 equ; 104 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 17 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 18 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 65 ( 21 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_770,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X4)
| ~ rslt(X5,X6)
| ~ obj(X5,X7)
| ~ arg1(X6,X7)
| ~ arg2(X6,X3)
| ~ attr(X7,X8)
| ~ attr(X7,X9)
| ~ attr(X2,X10)
| ~ subs(X5,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ sub(X10,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,familiename_1_1)
| ~ subr(X6,rprs_0)
| ~ val(X10,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ val(X8,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X9,mandela_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_770) ).
cnf(i_0_273,hypothesis,
val(c29,s__374dafrika_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_273) ).
cnf(i_0_274,hypothesis,
sub(c29,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_274) ).
cnf(i_0_266,hypothesis,
val(c35,mandela_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_266) ).
cnf(i_0_267,hypothesis,
sub(c35,familiename_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_267) ).
cnf(i_0_268,hypothesis,
val(c34,nelson_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_268) ).
cnf(i_0_269,hypothesis,
sub(c34,eigenname_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_269) ).
cnf(i_0_258,hypothesis,
subr(c55,rprs_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_258) ).
cnf(i_0_262,hypothesis,
subs(c43,w__344hlen_1_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_262) ).
cnf(i_0_263,hypothesis,
rslt(c43,c55),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_263) ).
cnf(i_0_276,hypothesis,
attr(c28,c29),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_276) ).
cnf(i_0_271,hypothesis,
attr(c33,c35),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_271) ).
cnf(i_0_272,hypothesis,
attr(c33,c34),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_272) ).
cnf(i_0_260,hypothesis,
arg1(c55,c33),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_260) ).
cnf(i_0_264,hypothesis,
obj(c43,c33),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_264) ).
cnf(i_0_259,hypothesis,
arg2(c55,c38),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_259) ).
cnf(i_0_265,hypothesis,
sub(c38,pr__344sident_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_265) ).
cnf(i_0_261,hypothesis,
in(c54,c28),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w47v494v/lgb.p',i_0_261) ).
cnf(c_0_789,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X4)
| ~ rslt(X5,X6)
| ~ obj(X5,X7)
| ~ arg1(X6,X7)
| ~ arg2(X6,X3)
| ~ attr(X7,X8)
| ~ attr(X7,X9)
| ~ attr(X2,X10)
| ~ subs(X5,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ sub(X10,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,familiename_1_1)
| ~ subr(X6,rprs_0)
| ~ val(X10,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ val(X8,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X9,mandela_0) ),
i_0_770 ).
cnf(c_0_790,hypothesis,
val(c29,s__374dafrika_0),
i_0_273 ).
cnf(c_0_791,hypothesis,
sub(c29,name_1_1),
i_0_274 ).
cnf(c_0_792,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,mandela_0)
| ~ val(X2,nelson_0)
| ~ subr(X3,rprs_0)
| ~ subs(X4,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X5,c29)
| ~ attr(X6,X1)
| ~ attr(X6,X2)
| ~ arg2(X3,X7)
| ~ arg1(X3,X6)
| ~ obj(X4,X6)
| ~ rslt(X4,X3)
| ~ sub(X1,familiename_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,X8)
| ~ in(X9,X5) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_789,c_0_790]),c_0_791])]) ).
cnf(c_0_793,hypothesis,
val(c35,mandela_0),
i_0_266 ).
cnf(c_0_794,hypothesis,
sub(c35,familiename_1_1),
i_0_267 ).
cnf(c_0_795,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,nelson_0)
| ~ subr(X2,rprs_0)
| ~ subs(X3,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X4,c29)
| ~ attr(X5,c35)
| ~ attr(X5,X1)
| ~ arg2(X2,X6)
| ~ arg1(X2,X5)
| ~ obj(X3,X5)
| ~ rslt(X3,X2)
| ~ sub(X1,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,X7)
| ~ in(X8,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_792,c_0_793]),c_0_794])]) ).
cnf(c_0_796,hypothesis,
val(c34,nelson_0),
i_0_268 ).
cnf(c_0_797,hypothesis,
sub(c34,eigenname_1_1),
i_0_269 ).
cnf(c_0_798,hypothesis,
( ~ subr(X1,rprs_0)
| ~ subs(X2,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X3,c29)
| ~ attr(X4,c35)
| ~ attr(X4,c34)
| ~ arg2(X1,X5)
| ~ arg1(X1,X4)
| ~ obj(X2,X4)
| ~ rslt(X2,X1)
| ~ sub(X5,X6)
| ~ in(X7,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_795,c_0_796]),c_0_797])]) ).
cnf(c_0_799,hypothesis,
subr(c55,rprs_0),
i_0_258 ).
cnf(c_0_800,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X2,c29)
| ~ attr(X3,c35)
| ~ attr(X3,c34)
| ~ arg2(c55,X4)
| ~ arg1(c55,X3)
| ~ obj(X1,X3)
| ~ rslt(X1,c55)
| ~ sub(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X6,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_798,c_0_799]) ).
cnf(c_0_801,hypothesis,
subs(c43,w__344hlen_1_2),
i_0_262 ).
cnf(c_0_802,hypothesis,
rslt(c43,c55),
i_0_263 ).
cnf(c_0_803,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c29)
| ~ attr(X2,c35)
| ~ attr(X2,c34)
| ~ arg2(c55,X3)
| ~ arg1(c55,X2)
| ~ obj(c43,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_800,c_0_801]),c_0_802])]) ).
cnf(c_0_804,hypothesis,
attr(c28,c29),
i_0_276 ).
cnf(c_0_805,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c35)
| ~ attr(X1,c34)
| ~ arg2(c55,X2)
| ~ arg1(c55,X1)
| ~ obj(c43,X1)
| ~ sub(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,c28) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_803,c_0_804]) ).
cnf(c_0_806,hypothesis,
attr(c33,c35),
i_0_271 ).
cnf(c_0_807,hypothesis,
attr(c33,c34),
i_0_272 ).
cnf(c_0_808,hypothesis,
arg1(c55,c33),
i_0_260 ).
cnf(c_0_809,hypothesis,
obj(c43,c33),
i_0_264 ).
cnf(c_0_810,hypothesis,
( ~ arg2(c55,X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X3,c28) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_805,c_0_806]),c_0_807]),c_0_808]),c_0_809])]) ).
cnf(c_0_811,hypothesis,
arg2(c55,c38),
i_0_259 ).
cnf(c_0_812,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(c38,X1)
| ~ in(X2,c28) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_810,c_0_811]) ).
cnf(c_0_813,hypothesis,
sub(c38,pr__344sident_1_1),
i_0_265 ).
cnf(c_0_814,hypothesis,
in(c54,c28),
i_0_261 ).
cnf(c_0_815,hypothesis,
~ in(X1,c28),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_812,c_0_813]) ).
cnf(c_0_816,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_814,c_0_815]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR116+33 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 15:58:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.36/0.63 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.36/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.36/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.84/2.92 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.84/2.92 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.84/2.92 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.84/2.92 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.84/2.92 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.84/2.92 #
% 8.84/2.92 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 8.84/2.92 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.84/2.92
% 8.84/2.92 # Proof found!
% 8.84/2.92 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.84/2.92 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.84/2.92 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.84/2.92
% 8.84/2.92 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.84/2.92 # User time : 0.030 s
% 8.84/2.92 # System time : 0.010 s
% 8.84/2.92 # Total time : 0.040 s
% 8.84/2.92 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.84/2.92
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------