TSTP Solution File: CSR115+94 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+94 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.97s 2.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 68 ( 0 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 53 ( 33 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_815,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ prop(X2,britisch__1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_815) ).
cnf(i_0_323,hypothesis,
val(c55722,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_323) ).
cnf(i_0_324,hypothesis,
sub(c55722,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_324) ).
cnf(i_0_317,hypothesis,
prop(c56040,britisch__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_317) ).
cnf(i_0_316,hypothesis,
sub(c56040,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_316) ).
cnf(i_0_327,hypothesis,
attr(c55721,c55722),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_327) ).
cnf(i_0_674,plain,
( obj(esk24_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X2,X1)
| ~ has_fact_leq(X2,real) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_674) ).
cnf(i_0_641,plain,
( has_fact_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ fact(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_641) ).
cnf(i_0_193,hypothesis,
fact(c56040,real),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_193) ).
cnf(i_0_773,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_773) ).
cnf(i_0_576,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,grossbritannien_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_576) ).
cnf(i_0_303,hypothesis,
attr(c56078,c56079),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ca30kyiq/lgb.p',i_0_303) ).
cnf(c_0_828,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ prop(X2,britisch__1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
i_0_815 ).
cnf(c_0_829,hypothesis,
val(c55722,bmw_0),
i_0_323 ).
cnf(c_0_830,hypothesis,
sub(c55722,name_1_1),
i_0_324 ).
cnf(c_0_831,hypothesis,
( ~ prop(X1,britisch__1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c55722)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_828,c_0_829]),c_0_830])]) ).
cnf(c_0_832,hypothesis,
prop(c56040,britisch__1_1),
i_0_317 ).
cnf(c_0_833,hypothesis,
sub(c56040,firma_1_1),
i_0_316 ).
cnf(c_0_834,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c55722)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c56040) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_831,c_0_832]),c_0_833])]) ).
cnf(c_0_835,hypothesis,
attr(c55721,c55722),
i_0_327 ).
cnf(c_0_836,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c56040) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_834,c_0_835]) ).
cnf(c_0_837,plain,
( obj(esk24_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X2,X1)
| ~ has_fact_leq(X2,real) ),
i_0_674 ).
cnf(c_0_838,plain,
( ~ has_fact_leq(c56040,real)
| ~ loc(c56040,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_836,c_0_837]) ).
cnf(c_0_839,plain,
( has_fact_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ fact(X1,X2) ),
i_0_641 ).
cnf(c_0_840,hypothesis,
fact(c56040,real),
i_0_193 ).
cnf(c_0_841,plain,
( ~ loc(c56040,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_838,c_0_839]),c_0_840])]) ).
cnf(c_0_842,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
i_0_773 ).
cnf(c_0_843,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(c56040,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_841,c_0_842]) ).
cnf(c_0_844,hypothesis,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_843,c_0_832]) ).
cnf(c_0_845,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,grossbritannien_0),
i_0_576 ).
cnf(c_0_846,hypothesis,
attr(c56078,c56079),
i_0_303 ).
cnf(c_0_847,plain,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_844,c_0_845]) ).
cnf(c_0_848,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_846,c_0_847]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+94 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 18:01:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.38/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.97/2.70 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.97/2.70 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.97/2.70 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.97/2.70 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.97/2.70 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 4.97/2.70 #
% 4.97/2.70 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 4.97/2.70 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.97/2.70
% 4.97/2.70 # Proof found!
% 4.97/2.70 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.97/2.70 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.97/2.70 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.97/2.70
% 4.97/2.70 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.97/2.70 # User time : 0.052 s
% 4.97/2.70 # System time : 0.012 s
% 4.97/2.70 # Total time : 0.064 s
% 4.97/2.70 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.97/2.70
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------