TSTP Solution File: CSR115+85 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+85 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.19s 2.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   87 (   0 equ;  66 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (  24 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_763,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X2,X7)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_763) ).

cnf(i_0_264,hypothesis,
    val(c2213,bmw_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_264) ).

cnf(i_0_265,hypothesis,
    sub(c2213,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_265) ).

cnf(i_0_269,hypothesis,
    sub(c2205,jahr__1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_269) ).

cnf(i_0_266,hypothesis,
    sub(c2212,firma_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_266) ).

cnf(i_0_267,hypothesis,
    attr(c2212,c2213),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_267) ).

cnf(i_0_270,hypothesis,
    attr(c2204,c2205),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_270) ).

cnf(i_0_742,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_742) ).

cnf(i_0_759,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_759) ).

cnf(i_0_760,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_760) ).

cnf(i_0_761,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7y1t7aax/lgb.p',i_0_761) ).

cnf(c_0_775,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X2,X7)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
    i_0_763 ).

cnf(c_0_776,hypothesis,
    val(c2213,bmw_0),
    i_0_264 ).

cnf(c_0_777,hypothesis,
    sub(c2213,name_1_1),
    i_0_265 ).

cnf(c_0_778,hypothesis,
    ( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X3,c2213)
    | ~ attr(X4,X1)
    | ~ attr(X5,X2)
    | ~ obj(X6,X3) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_775,c_0_776]),c_0_777])]) ).

cnf(c_0_779,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c2213)
    | ~ attr(X3,c2213)
    | ~ attr(X4,X1)
    | ~ obj(X5,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_778,c_0_776]),c_0_777])]) ).

cnf(c_0_780,hypothesis,
    sub(c2205,jahr__1_1),
    i_0_269 ).

cnf(c_0_781,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X1,c2213)
    | ~ attr(X2,c2213)
    | ~ attr(X3,c2205)
    | ~ obj(X4,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_779,c_0_780]) ).

cnf(c_0_782,hypothesis,
    sub(c2212,firma_1_1),
    i_0_266 ).

cnf(c_0_783,hypothesis,
    attr(c2212,c2213),
    i_0_267 ).

cnf(c_0_784,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c2213)
    | ~ attr(X2,c2205)
    | ~ obj(X3,c2212) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_781,c_0_782]),c_0_783])]) ).

cnf(c_0_785,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c2205)
    | ~ obj(X2,c2212) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_784,c_0_783]) ).

cnf(c_0_786,hypothesis,
    attr(c2204,c2205),
    i_0_270 ).

cnf(c_0_787,hypothesis,
    ~ obj(X1,c2212),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_785,c_0_786]) ).

cnf(c_0_788,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    i_0_742 ).

cnf(c_0_789,plain,
    ( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,c2212) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_787,c_0_788]) ).

cnf(c_0_790,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_759 ).

cnf(c_0_791,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c2212)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_789,c_0_790]) ).

cnf(c_0_792,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_760 ).

cnf(c_0_793,plain,
    ( ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c2212)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_791,c_0_792]) ).

cnf(c_0_794,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_761 ).

cnf(c_0_795,plain,
    ~ sub(c2212,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_793,c_0_794]) ).

cnf(c_0_796,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_782,c_0_795]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR115+85 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:27:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.38/0.61  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.38/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.38/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.19/2.81  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.19/2.81  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.19/2.81  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.19/2.81  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.19/2.81  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.19/2.81  #
% 8.19/2.81  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 8.19/2.81  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.19/2.81  
% 8.19/2.81  # Proof found!
% 8.19/2.81  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.19/2.81  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.19/2.81  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.19/2.81  
% 8.19/2.81  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.19/2.81  # User time                : 0.037 s
% 8.19/2.81  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 8.19/2.81  # Total time               : 0.042 s
% 8.19/2.81  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 8.19/2.81  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------