TSTP Solution File: CSR115+80 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+80 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.78s 2.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (   0 equ;  56 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (  37 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_710,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X2,X7)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u3xmpew/lgb.p',i_0_710) ).

cnf(i_0_219,hypothesis,
    sub(c36712,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u3xmpew/lgb.p',i_0_219) ).

cnf(i_0_220,hypothesis,
    sub(c36711,firma_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u3xmpew/lgb.p',i_0_220) ).

cnf(i_0_221,hypothesis,
    attr(c36711,c36712),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u3xmpew/lgb.p',i_0_221) ).

cnf(i_0_689,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u3xmpew/lgb.p',i_0_689) ).

cnf(i_0_706,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u3xmpew/lgb.p',i_0_706) ).

cnf(i_0_708,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u3xmpew/lgb.p',i_0_708) ).

cnf(i_0_707,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u3xmpew/lgb.p',i_0_707) ).

cnf(c_0_719,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X2,X7)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1) ),
    i_0_710 ).

cnf(c_0_720,hypothesis,
    sub(c36712,name_1_1),
    i_0_219 ).

cnf(c_0_721,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c36712)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5)
    | ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_719,c_0_720]) ).

cnf(c_0_722,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X1,c36712)
    | ~ attr(X2,c36712)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_721,c_0_720]) ).

cnf(c_0_723,hypothesis,
    sub(c36711,firma_1_1),
    i_0_220 ).

cnf(c_0_724,hypothesis,
    attr(c36711,c36712),
    i_0_221 ).

cnf(c_0_725,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c36712)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ obj(X4,c36711) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_722,c_0_723]),c_0_724])]) ).

cnf(c_0_726,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ obj(X3,c36711) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_725,c_0_724]) ).

cnf(c_0_727,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    i_0_689 ).

cnf(c_0_728,plain,
    ( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,c36711)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_726,c_0_727]) ).

cnf(c_0_729,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_706 ).

cnf(c_0_730,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c36711)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_728,c_0_729]) ).

cnf(c_0_731,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_708 ).

cnf(c_0_732,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c36711,X1),X2)
    | ~ sub(c36711,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_730,c_0_731]) ).

cnf(c_0_733,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_707 ).

cnf(c_0_734,plain,
    ( ~ sub(c36711,X1)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_732,c_0_733]) ).

cnf(c_0_735,hypothesis,
    ~ attr(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_734,c_0_723]) ).

cnf(c_0_736,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_724,c_0_735]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR115+80 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 10:02:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.39/0.61  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.39/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.39/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.78/2.77  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.78/2.77  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.78/2.77  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.78/2.77  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.78/2.77  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.78/2.77  #
% 7.78/2.77  # Preprocessing time       : 0.029 s
% 7.78/2.77  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.78/2.77  
% 7.78/2.77  # Proof found!
% 7.78/2.77  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.78/2.77  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.78/2.77  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.78/2.77  
% 7.78/2.77  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.78/2.77  # User time                : 0.047 s
% 7.78/2.77  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 7.78/2.77  # Total time               : 0.058 s
% 7.78/2.77  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.78/2.77  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------