TSTP Solution File: CSR115+75 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+75 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.91s 2.82s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 78 ( 0 equ; 61 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 37 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_638,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_638) ).
cnf(i_0_148,hypothesis,
val(c86,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_148) ).
cnf(i_0_149,hypothesis,
sub(c86,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_149) ).
cnf(i_0_150,hypothesis,
sub(c85,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_150) ).
cnf(i_0_151,hypothesis,
attr(c85,c86),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_151) ).
cnf(i_0_617,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_617) ).
cnf(i_0_634,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_634) ).
cnf(i_0_636,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_636) ).
cnf(i_0_635,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vzt8y81o/lgb.p',i_0_635) ).
cnf(c_0_648,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_638 ).
cnf(c_0_649,hypothesis,
val(c86,bmw_0),
i_0_148 ).
cnf(c_0_650,hypothesis,
sub(c86,name_1_1),
i_0_149 ).
cnf(c_0_651,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c86)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_648,c_0_649]),c_0_650])]) ).
cnf(c_0_652,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c86)
| ~ attr(X2,c86)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_651,c_0_649]),c_0_650])]) ).
cnf(c_0_653,hypothesis,
sub(c85,firma_1_1),
i_0_150 ).
cnf(c_0_654,hypothesis,
attr(c85,c86),
i_0_151 ).
cnf(c_0_655,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c86)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c85) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_652,c_0_653]),c_0_654])]) ).
cnf(c_0_656,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c85) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_655,c_0_654]) ).
cnf(c_0_657,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_617 ).
cnf(c_0_658,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c85)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_656,c_0_657]) ).
cnf(c_0_659,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_634 ).
cnf(c_0_660,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c85)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_658,c_0_659]) ).
cnf(c_0_661,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_636 ).
cnf(c_0_662,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c85,X1),X2)
| ~ sub(c85,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_660,c_0_661]) ).
cnf(c_0_663,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_635 ).
cnf(c_0_664,plain,
( ~ sub(c85,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_662,c_0_663]) ).
cnf(c_0_665,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_664,c_0_653]) ).
cnf(c_0_666,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_654,c_0_665]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+75 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:06:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.91/2.82 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.91/2.82 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.91/2.82 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.91/2.82 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.91/2.82 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.91/2.82 #
% 7.91/2.82 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 7.91/2.82 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.91/2.82
% 7.91/2.82 # Proof found!
% 7.91/2.82 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.91/2.82 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.91/2.82 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.91/2.82
% 7.91/2.82 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.91/2.82 # User time : 0.038 s
% 7.91/2.82 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.91/2.82 # Total time : 0.045 s
% 7.91/2.82 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.91/2.82
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------