TSTP Solution File: CSR115+68 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+68 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.32s 2.93s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 78 ( 0 equ; 61 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 37 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_678,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_678) ).
cnf(i_0_189,hypothesis,
val(c148,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_189) ).
cnf(i_0_190,hypothesis,
sub(c148,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_190) ).
cnf(i_0_191,hypothesis,
sub(c147,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_191) ).
cnf(i_0_192,hypothesis,
attr(c147,c148),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_192) ).
cnf(i_0_657,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_657) ).
cnf(i_0_674,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_674) ).
cnf(i_0_676,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_676) ).
cnf(i_0_675,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-71xz12y5/lgb.p',i_0_675) ).
cnf(c_0_688,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_678 ).
cnf(c_0_689,hypothesis,
val(c148,bmw_0),
i_0_189 ).
cnf(c_0_690,hypothesis,
sub(c148,name_1_1),
i_0_190 ).
cnf(c_0_691,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c148)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_688,c_0_689]),c_0_690])]) ).
cnf(c_0_692,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c148)
| ~ attr(X2,c148)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_691,c_0_689]),c_0_690])]) ).
cnf(c_0_693,hypothesis,
sub(c147,firma_1_1),
i_0_191 ).
cnf(c_0_694,hypothesis,
attr(c147,c148),
i_0_192 ).
cnf(c_0_695,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c148)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c147) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_692,c_0_693]),c_0_694])]) ).
cnf(c_0_696,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c147) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_695,c_0_694]) ).
cnf(c_0_697,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_657 ).
cnf(c_0_698,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c147)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_696,c_0_697]) ).
cnf(c_0_699,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_674 ).
cnf(c_0_700,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c147)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_698,c_0_699]) ).
cnf(c_0_701,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_676 ).
cnf(c_0_702,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c147,X1),X2)
| ~ sub(c147,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_700,c_0_701]) ).
cnf(c_0_703,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_675 ).
cnf(c_0_704,plain,
( ~ sub(c147,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_702,c_0_703]) ).
cnf(c_0_705,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_704,c_0_693]) ).
cnf(c_0_706,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_694,c_0_705]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR115+68 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:57:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.43/0.63 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.43/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.43/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.32/2.93 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.32/2.93 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.32/2.93 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.32/2.93 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.32/2.93 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.32/2.93 #
% 9.32/2.93 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 9.32/2.93 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.32/2.93
% 9.32/2.93 # Proof found!
% 9.32/2.93 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.32/2.93 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.32/2.93 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.32/2.93
% 9.32/2.93 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.32/2.93 # User time : 0.047 s
% 9.32/2.93 # System time : 0.010 s
% 9.32/2.93 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 9.32/2.93 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 9.32/2.93
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------