TSTP Solution File: CSR115+66 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+66 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.69s 2.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   34 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;  34 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   97 (   0 equ;  72 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;  12 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_667,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ agt(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X2,X5)
    | ~ val(X4,X6)
    | ~ temp(X1,X3)
    | ~ subs(X1,n374bernehmen_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X5,bmw_0)
    | ~ has_card_leq(X6,int1994) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_667) ).

cnf(i_0_489,plain,
    ( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ card(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_489) ).

cnf(i_0_72,hypothesis,
    card(c1,int1994),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_72) ).

cnf(i_0_165,hypothesis,
    sub(c86,firma_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_165) ).

cnf(i_0_164,hypothesis,
    sub(c87,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_164) ).

cnf(i_0_163,hypothesis,
    val(c87,bmw_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_163) ).

cnf(i_0_168,hypothesis,
    sub(c5,jahr__1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_168) ).

cnf(i_0_167,hypothesis,
    val(c5,c1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_167) ).

cnf(i_0_171,hypothesis,
    subs(c3,n374bernehmen_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_171) ).

cnf(i_0_170,hypothesis,
    temp(c3,c4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_170) ).

cnf(i_0_169,hypothesis,
    attr(c4,c5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_169) ).

cnf(i_0_173,hypothesis,
    agt(c3,c86),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_173) ).

cnf(i_0_166,hypothesis,
    attr(c86,c87),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ut9wfocd/lgb.p',i_0_166) ).

cnf(c_0_681,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ agt(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X2,X5)
    | ~ val(X4,X6)
    | ~ temp(X1,X3)
    | ~ subs(X1,n374bernehmen_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X5,bmw_0)
    | ~ has_card_leq(X6,int1994) ),
    i_0_667 ).

cnf(c_0_682,plain,
    ( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ card(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_489 ).

cnf(c_0_683,plain,
    ( ~ card(X1,int1994)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ subs(X5,n374bernehmen_1_1)
    | ~ temp(X5,X6)
    | ~ val(X3,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X4,X1)
    | ~ attr(X6,X4)
    | ~ attr(X7,X3)
    | ~ agt(X5,X7) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_681,c_0_682]) ).

cnf(c_0_684,hypothesis,
    card(c1,int1994),
    i_0_72 ).

cnf(c_0_685,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ subs(X4,n374bernehmen_1_1)
    | ~ temp(X4,X5)
    | ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X3,c1)
    | ~ attr(X5,X3)
    | ~ attr(X6,X2)
    | ~ agt(X4,X6) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_683,c_0_684]) ).

cnf(c_0_686,hypothesis,
    sub(c86,firma_1_1),
    i_0_165 ).

cnf(c_0_687,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ subs(X3,n374bernehmen_1_1)
    | ~ temp(X3,X4)
    | ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X2,c1)
    | ~ attr(X4,X2)
    | ~ attr(X5,X1)
    | ~ agt(X3,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_685,c_0_686]) ).

cnf(c_0_688,hypothesis,
    sub(c87,name_1_1),
    i_0_164 ).

cnf(c_0_689,hypothesis,
    val(c87,bmw_0),
    i_0_163 ).

cnf(c_0_690,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ subs(X2,n374bernehmen_1_1)
    | ~ temp(X2,X3)
    | ~ val(X1,c1)
    | ~ attr(X4,c87)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ agt(X2,X4) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_687,c_0_688]),c_0_689])]) ).

cnf(c_0_691,hypothesis,
    sub(c5,jahr__1_1),
    i_0_168 ).

cnf(c_0_692,hypothesis,
    val(c5,c1),
    i_0_167 ).

cnf(c_0_693,hypothesis,
    ( ~ subs(X1,n374bernehmen_1_1)
    | ~ temp(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,c87)
    | ~ attr(X2,c5)
    | ~ agt(X1,X3) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_690,c_0_691]),c_0_692])]) ).

cnf(c_0_694,hypothesis,
    subs(c3,n374bernehmen_1_1),
    i_0_171 ).

cnf(c_0_695,hypothesis,
    ( ~ temp(c3,X1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c87)
    | ~ attr(X1,c5)
    | ~ agt(c3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_693,c_0_694]) ).

cnf(c_0_696,hypothesis,
    temp(c3,c4),
    i_0_170 ).

cnf(c_0_697,hypothesis,
    attr(c4,c5),
    i_0_169 ).

cnf(c_0_698,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c87)
    | ~ agt(c3,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_695,c_0_696]),c_0_697])]) ).

cnf(c_0_699,hypothesis,
    agt(c3,c86),
    i_0_173 ).

cnf(c_0_700,hypothesis,
    attr(c86,c87),
    i_0_166 ).

cnf(c_0_701,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_698,c_0_699]),c_0_700])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR115+66 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 12:21:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.43/0.60  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.43/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.43/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.69/2.61  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.69/2.61  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.69/2.61  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.69/2.61  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.69/2.61  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.69/2.61  #
% 7.69/2.61  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 7.69/2.61  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.69/2.61  
% 7.69/2.61  # Proof found!
% 7.69/2.61  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.69/2.61  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.69/2.61  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.69/2.61  
% 7.69/2.61  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.69/2.61  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 7.69/2.61  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.69/2.61  # Total time               : 0.030 s
% 7.69/2.61  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.69/2.61  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------