TSTP Solution File: CSR115+63 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+63 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.23s 2.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 87 ( 0 equ; 66 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 24 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_805,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_805) ).
cnf(i_0_306,hypothesis,
val(c704,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_306) ).
cnf(i_0_307,hypothesis,
sub(c704,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_307) ).
cnf(i_0_313,hypothesis,
sub(c652,jahr__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_313) ).
cnf(i_0_308,hypothesis,
sub(c703,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_308) ).
cnf(i_0_309,hypothesis,
attr(c703,c704),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_309) ).
cnf(i_0_318,hypothesis,
attr(c649,c652),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_318) ).
cnf(i_0_784,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_784) ).
cnf(i_0_801,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_801) ).
cnf(i_0_802,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_802) ).
cnf(i_0_803,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e4fgkami/lgb.p',i_0_803) ).
cnf(c_0_817,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_805 ).
cnf(c_0_818,hypothesis,
val(c704,bmw_0),
i_0_306 ).
cnf(c_0_819,hypothesis,
sub(c704,name_1_1),
i_0_307 ).
cnf(c_0_820,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X3,c704)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ obj(X6,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_817,c_0_818]),c_0_819])]) ).
cnf(c_0_821,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c704)
| ~ attr(X3,c704)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ obj(X5,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_820,c_0_818]),c_0_819])]) ).
cnf(c_0_822,hypothesis,
sub(c652,jahr__1_1),
i_0_313 ).
cnf(c_0_823,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c704)
| ~ attr(X2,c704)
| ~ attr(X3,c652)
| ~ obj(X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_821,c_0_822]) ).
cnf(c_0_824,hypothesis,
sub(c703,firma_1_1),
i_0_308 ).
cnf(c_0_825,hypothesis,
attr(c703,c704),
i_0_309 ).
cnf(c_0_826,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c704)
| ~ attr(X2,c652)
| ~ obj(X3,c703) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_823,c_0_824]),c_0_825])]) ).
cnf(c_0_827,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c652)
| ~ obj(X2,c703) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_826,c_0_825]) ).
cnf(c_0_828,hypothesis,
attr(c649,c652),
i_0_318 ).
cnf(c_0_829,hypothesis,
~ obj(X1,c703),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_827,c_0_828]) ).
cnf(c_0_830,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_784 ).
cnf(c_0_831,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c703) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_829,c_0_830]) ).
cnf(c_0_832,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_801 ).
cnf(c_0_833,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c703)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_831,c_0_832]) ).
cnf(c_0_834,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_802 ).
cnf(c_0_835,plain,
( ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c703)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_833,c_0_834]) ).
cnf(c_0_836,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_803 ).
cnf(c_0_837,plain,
~ sub(c703,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_835,c_0_836]) ).
cnf(c_0_838,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_824,c_0_837]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+63 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 04:38:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.60 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.23/2.60 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.23/2.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.23/2.60 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.23/2.60 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.23/2.60 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.23/2.60 #
% 7.23/2.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 7.23/2.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.23/2.60
% 7.23/2.60 # Proof found!
% 7.23/2.60 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.23/2.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.23/2.60 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.23/2.60
% 7.23/2.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.23/2.60 # User time : 0.057 s
% 7.23/2.60 # System time : 0.009 s
% 7.23/2.60 # Total time : 0.066 s
% 7.23/2.60 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.23/2.60
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------