TSTP Solution File: CSR115+58 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+58 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.18s 2.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 36 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 34 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_756,negated_conjecture,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ subs(X7,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t098i777/input.p',i_0_756) ).
cnf(i_0_265,hypothesis,
sub(c104,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t098i777/input.p',i_0_265) ).
cnf(i_0_267,hypothesis,
attr(c103,c104),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t098i777/input.p',i_0_267) ).
cnf(i_0_289,plain,
( subs(esk14_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ subs(X1,X2)
| ~ chea(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t098i777/input.p',i_0_289) ).
cnf(i_0_465,plain,
chea(n374bernehmen_1_1,annahme_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t098i777/input.p',i_0_465) ).
cnf(i_0_262,hypothesis,
subs(c113,annahme_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t098i777/input.p',i_0_262) ).
cnf(c_0_763,negated_conjecture,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ subs(X7,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1) ),
i_0_756 ).
cnf(c_0_764,hypothesis,
sub(c104,name_1_1),
i_0_265 ).
cnf(c_0_765,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c104)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ sub(X3,name_1_1)
| ~ subs(X6,n374bernehmen_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_763,c_0_764]) ).
cnf(c_0_766,hypothesis,
attr(c103,c104),
i_0_267 ).
cnf(c_0_767,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ subs(X5,n374bernehmen_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_765,c_0_766]) ).
cnf(c_0_768,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c104)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ subs(X4,n374bernehmen_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_767,c_0_764]) ).
cnf(c_0_769,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ subs(X3,n374bernehmen_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_768,c_0_766]) ).
cnf(c_0_770,plain,
( subs(esk14_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ subs(X1,X2)
| ~ chea(X3,X2) ),
i_0_289 ).
cnf(c_0_771,plain,
( ~ chea(n374bernehmen_1_1,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ subs(X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_769,c_0_770]) ).
cnf(c_0_772,plain,
chea(n374bernehmen_1_1,annahme_1_1),
i_0_465 ).
cnf(c_0_773,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ subs(X3,annahme_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_771,c_0_772]) ).
cnf(c_0_774,hypothesis,
subs(c113,annahme_1_1),
i_0_262 ).
cnf(c_0_775,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_773,c_0_774]) ).
cnf(c_0_776,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_766,c_0_775]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : CSR115+58 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.10 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 19:40:41 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.14/0.49 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.14/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.14/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.18/2.53 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 8.18/2.53 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.18/2.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 8.18/2.53
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof found!
% 8.18/2.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.18/2.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object total steps : 20
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object clause steps : 14
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 8.18/2.53 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 8.18/2.53 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.18/2.53 # Parsed axioms : 776
% 8.18/2.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Initial clauses : 776
% 8.18/2.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 776
% 8.18/2.53 # Processed clauses : 810
% 8.18/2.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # ...subsumed : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 810
% 8.18/2.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 8.18/2.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Generated clauses : 832
% 8.18/2.53 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 827
% 8.18/2.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Paramodulations : 831
% 8.18/2.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 802
% 8.18/2.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 473
% 8.18/2.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 8.18/2.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 328
% 8.18/2.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 782
% 8.18/2.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 2939
% 8.18/2.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 8.18/2.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35540
% 8.18/2.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12334
% 8.18/2.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 8.18/2.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1636
% 8.18/2.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.18/2.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 25084
% 8.18/2.53
% 8.18/2.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.18/2.53 # User time : 0.053 s
% 8.18/2.53 # System time : 0.003 s
% 8.18/2.53 # Total time : 0.056 s
% 8.18/2.53 # ...preprocessing : 0.022 s
% 8.18/2.53 # ...main loop : 0.034 s
% 8.18/2.53 # Maximum resident set size: 8916 pages
% 8.18/2.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------