TSTP Solution File: CSR115+47 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+47 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.74s 2.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 23 unt; 0 nHn; 34 RR)
% Number of literals : 96 ( 0 equ; 71 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 12 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_664,negated_conjecture,
( ~ agt(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ attr(X2,X6)
| ~ val(X5,X7)
| ~ temp(X1,X4)
| ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_664) ).
cnf(i_0_486,plain,
( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ card(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_486) ).
cnf(i_0_65,hypothesis,
card(c508,int1994),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_65) ).
cnf(i_0_170,hypothesis,
sub(c420,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_170) ).
cnf(i_0_169,hypothesis,
val(c420,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_169) ).
cnf(i_0_163,hypothesis,
sub(c518,jahr__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_163) ).
cnf(i_0_162,hypothesis,
val(c518,c508),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_162) ).
cnf(i_0_167,hypothesis,
sub(c506,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_167) ).
cnf(i_0_172,hypothesis,
attr(c419,c420),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_172) ).
cnf(i_0_164,hypothesis,
attr(c517,c518),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_164) ).
cnf(i_0_160,hypothesis,
obj(c519,c506),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_160) ).
cnf(i_0_158,hypothesis,
temp(c519,c517),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_158) ).
cnf(i_0_161,hypothesis,
agt(c519,c419),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ms8bt6zd/lgb.p',i_0_161) ).
cnf(c_0_678,negated_conjecture,
( ~ agt(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ attr(X2,X6)
| ~ val(X5,X7)
| ~ temp(X1,X4)
| ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994) ),
i_0_664 ).
cnf(c_0_679,plain,
( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ card(X1,X2) ),
i_0_486 ).
cnf(c_0_680,plain,
( ~ card(X1,int1994)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,firma_1_1)
| ~ temp(X5,X6)
| ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X6,X3)
| ~ attr(X7,X2)
| ~ obj(X5,X4)
| ~ agt(X5,X7) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_678,c_0_679]) ).
cnf(c_0_681,hypothesis,
card(c508,int1994),
i_0_65 ).
cnf(c_0_682,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
| ~ temp(X4,X5)
| ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X2,c508)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ attr(X6,X1)
| ~ obj(X4,X3)
| ~ agt(X4,X6) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_680,c_0_681]) ).
cnf(c_0_683,hypothesis,
sub(c420,name_1_1),
i_0_170 ).
cnf(c_0_684,hypothesis,
val(c420,bmw_0),
i_0_169 ).
cnf(c_0_685,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ temp(X3,X4)
| ~ val(X1,c508)
| ~ attr(X5,c420)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ obj(X3,X2)
| ~ agt(X3,X5) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_682,c_0_683]),c_0_684])]) ).
cnf(c_0_686,hypothesis,
sub(c518,jahr__1_1),
i_0_163 ).
cnf(c_0_687,hypothesis,
val(c518,c508),
i_0_162 ).
cnf(c_0_688,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ temp(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,c420)
| ~ attr(X3,c518)
| ~ obj(X2,X1)
| ~ agt(X2,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_685,c_0_686]),c_0_687])]) ).
cnf(c_0_689,hypothesis,
sub(c506,firma_1_1),
i_0_167 ).
cnf(c_0_690,hypothesis,
( ~ temp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,c420)
| ~ attr(X2,c518)
| ~ obj(X1,c506)
| ~ agt(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_688,c_0_689]) ).
cnf(c_0_691,hypothesis,
attr(c419,c420),
i_0_172 ).
cnf(c_0_692,hypothesis,
( ~ temp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X2,c518)
| ~ obj(X1,c506)
| ~ agt(X1,c419) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_690,c_0_691]) ).
cnf(c_0_693,hypothesis,
attr(c517,c518),
i_0_164 ).
cnf(c_0_694,hypothesis,
( ~ temp(X1,c517)
| ~ obj(X1,c506)
| ~ agt(X1,c419) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_692,c_0_693]) ).
cnf(c_0_695,hypothesis,
obj(c519,c506),
i_0_160 ).
cnf(c_0_696,hypothesis,
temp(c519,c517),
i_0_158 ).
cnf(c_0_697,hypothesis,
agt(c519,c419),
i_0_161 ).
cnf(c_0_698,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_694,c_0_695]),c_0_696]),c_0_697])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+47 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 04:00:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.58 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.74/2.63 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.74/2.63 # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.74/2.63 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.74/2.63 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.74/2.63 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 5.74/2.63 #
% 5.74/2.63 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 5.74/2.63 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.74/2.63
% 5.74/2.63 # Proof found!
% 5.74/2.63 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.74/2.63 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.74/2.63 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.74/2.63
% 5.74/2.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.74/2.63 # User time : 0.042 s
% 5.74/2.63 # System time : 0.012 s
% 5.74/2.63 # Total time : 0.053 s
% 5.74/2.63 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 5.74/2.63
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------