TSTP Solution File: CSR115+31 by lazyCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : CSR115+31 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 20:37:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 80.20s 10.67s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR115+31 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:59:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 80.20/10.67  % SZS status Theorem
% 80.20/10.67  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	~val(X0,X1) | ~sub(X0,jahr__1_1) | ~sub(X2,name_1_1) | ~sub(X3,name_1_1) | ~obj(X4,X5) | ~has_card_leq(X1,int1994) | ~attr(X6,X0) | ~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c1, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~val(X0,X1) | ~sub(X0,jahr__1_1) | ~sub(X2,name_1_1) | ~sub(X3,name_1_1) | ~obj(X4,X5) | ~has_card_leq(X1,int1994) | ~attr(X6,X0) | ~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	val(c5139,c5136)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X0 = c5139).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X1 = c5136).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c3, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~sub(X0,jahr__1_1) | ~sub(X2,name_1_1) | ~sub(X3,name_1_1) | ~obj(X4,X5) | ~has_card_leq(X1,int1994) | ~attr(X6,X0) | ~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c4, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	$false,
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c5, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	sub(c5139,jahr__1_1)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X0 = c5139).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	jahr__1_1 = jahr__1_1).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c6, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~sub(X2,name_1_1) | ~sub(X3,name_1_1) | ~obj(X4,X5) | ~has_card_leq(X1,int1994) | ~attr(X6,X0) | ~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c3, c5])).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c7, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	$false,
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c3, c5])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c8, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	sub(c12,name_1_1)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X2 = c12).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	name_1_1 = name_1_1).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c9, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~sub(X3,name_1_1) | ~obj(X4,X5) | ~has_card_leq(X1,int1994) | ~attr(X6,X0) | ~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c6, c8])).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c10, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	$false,
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c6, c8])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c11, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	sub(X2,name_1_1)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X3 = X2).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	name_1_1 = name_1_1).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c12, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~obj(X4,X5) | ~has_card_leq(X1,int1994) | ~attr(X6,X0) | ~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c9, c11])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c13, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	obj(sK100(X8),X8) | ~sP36(X8)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X4 = sK100(X8)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X5 = X8).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c14, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~has_card_leq(X1,int1994) | ~attr(X6,X0) | ~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c12, c13])).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c15, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~sP36(X8),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c12, c13])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c16, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	sP36(X9) | ~sub(X10,X11) | ~member(X11,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) | ~attr(X9,X10)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X8 = X9).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c17, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	$false,
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c15, c16])).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c18, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~sub(X10,X11) | ~member(X11,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) | ~attr(X9,X10),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c15, c16])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c19, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	sub(X2,name_1_1)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a11, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X10 = X2).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a12, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X11 = name_1_1).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c20, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~member(X11,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) | ~attr(X9,X10),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a11, a12])], [c18, c19])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c21, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	member(X12,cons(X13,X14)) | ~member(X12,X14)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a13, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X11 = X12).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a14, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))) = cons(X13,X14)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c22, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~attr(X9,X10),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a13, a14])], [c20, c21])).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c23, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~member(X12,X14),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a13, a14])], [c20, c21])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c24, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	member(X15,cons(X16,X17)) | ~member(X15,X17)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a15, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X12 = X15).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a16, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X14 = cons(X16,X17)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c25, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	$false,
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15, a16])], [c23, c24])).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c26, plain,
% 80.20/10.67  	~member(X15,X17),
% 80.20/10.67  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15, a16])], [c23, c24])).
% 80.20/10.67  
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c27, axiom,
% 80.20/10.67  	member(X18,cons(X18,X19))).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a17, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X15 = X18).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(a18, assumption,
% 80.20/10.67  	X17 = cons(X18,X19)).
% 80.20/10.67  cnf(c28, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a17, a18])], [c26, c27])).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c29, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a17, a18])], [c26, c27])).
% 80.20/10.68  
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c30, axiom,
% 80.20/10.68  	attr(c11,c12)).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a19, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X9 = c11).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a20, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X10 = c12).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c31, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a19, a20])], [c22, c30])).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c32, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a19, a20])], [c22, c30])).
% 80.20/10.68  
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c33, axiom,
% 80.20/10.68  	has_card_leq(X20,X21) | ~card(X20,X21)).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a21, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X1 = X20).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a22, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	int1994 = X21).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c34, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	~attr(X6,X0) | ~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a21, a22])], [c14, c33])).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c35, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	~card(X20,X21),
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a21, a22])], [c14, c33])).
% 80.20/10.68  
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c36, axiom,
% 80.20/10.68  	card(c5136,int1994)).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a23, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X20 = c5136).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a24, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X21 = int1994).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c37, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a23, a24])], [c35, c36])).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c38, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a23, a24])], [c35, c36])).
% 80.20/10.68  
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c39, axiom,
% 80.20/10.68  	attr(c5138,c5139)).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a25, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X6 = c5138).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a26, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X0 = c5139).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c40, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	~attr(X7,X2) | ~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a25, a26])], [c34, c39])).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c41, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a25, a26])], [c34, c39])).
% 80.20/10.68  
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c42, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	attr(X9,X10)).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a27, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X7 = X9).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a28, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X2 = X10).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c43, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	~attr(X5,X3),
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a27, a28])], [c40, c42])).
% 80.20/10.68  
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c44, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	attr(X9,X10)).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a29, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X5 = X9).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(a30, assumption,
% 80.20/10.68  	X3 = X10).
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c45, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a29, a30])], [c43, c44])).
% 80.20/10.68  
% 80.20/10.68  cnf(c46, plain,
% 80.20/10.68  	$false,
% 80.20/10.68  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X0, c5139),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X1, c5136),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X2, c12),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X3, c12),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X4, sK100(X8)),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X5, c11),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X6, c5138),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X7, c11),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X8, c11),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X9, c11),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X10, c12),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X11, name_1_1),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X12, name_1_1),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X13, eigenname_1_1),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X14, cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X15, name_1_1),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X16, familiename_1_1),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X17, cons(name_1_1,nil)),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X18, name_1_1),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X19, nil),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X20, c5136),
% 80.20/10.68  		bind(X21, int1994)
% 80.20/10.68  	],
% 80.20/10.68  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15, a16, a17, a18, a19, a20, a21, a22, a23, a24, a25, a26, a27, a28, a29, a30])).
% 80.20/10.68  
% 80.20/10.68  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------